http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/04/24/no-abortionbreast-cancer-link/ Think. It ain't illegal yet... Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:16:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/04/24/no-abortionbreast-cancer-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4406 Carrie Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:33:21 +0000 http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=573#comment-4406 These studies say that women who have had children before the age of 35 are less at risk for breast cancer than those who have not had children. What about women who have never been pregnant? Why are these women not a factor in the study? These studies say that women who have had children before the age of 35 are less at risk for breast cancer than those who have not had children. What about women who have never been pregnant? Why are these women not a factor in the study?

]]> http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/04/24/no-abortionbreast-cancer-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4405 Robert Silvey Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:05:34 +0000 http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=573#comment-4405 The scare tactics include bogus web pages, such as <a href="http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage" rel="nofollow">this official-looking one</a> that appears to be from the National Cancer Institute. It's particularly effective because it's so restrained and therefore at first reading looks scientifically valid. I picked this up from <a href="http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=no_link_between_abortion_and_breast_canc&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1&ref=rss" rel="nofollow">SciAm Observations</a>, which has several other interesting links. The scare tactics include bogus web pages, such as this official-looking one that appears to be from the National Cancer Institute. It’s particularly effective because it’s so restrained and therefore at first reading looks scientifically valid. I picked this up from SciAm Observations, which has several other interesting links.

]]>