<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Executive offices exempt from Executive Orders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The White House is lying about correctly safeguarding classified information &#124; Scholars and Rogues</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-96275</link>
		<dc:creator>The White House is lying about correctly safeguarding classified information &#124; Scholars and Rogues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-96275</guid>
		<description>[...] links on this topic: Security office&#8217;s experts are not stereotypical bureaucrats Executive Offices exempt from Executive Orders National secrecy Executive Orders vs. the Office fo the Vice President Security failures at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links on this topic: Security office&#8217;s experts are not stereotypical bureaucrats Executive Offices exempt from Executive Orders National secrecy Executive Orders vs. the Office fo the Vice President Security failures at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staff cartoonist presents: Bush/Cheney Oncology Associates, or: &#8216;The war on tumor&#8217; &#171; Scholars and Rogues</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Staff cartoonist presents: Bush/Cheney Oncology Associates, or: &#8216;The war on tumor&#8217; &#171; Scholars and Rogues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-198</guid>
		<description>[...] Staff cartoonist presents: Bush/Cheney Oncology Associates, or: &#8216;The war on&#160;tumor&#8217; June 25, 2007 Posted by Nick Langewis in cartooning, Dick Cheney, bush administration, executive branch criminality, democracy, George Bush, politics, comics, comedy, webcomics, humor. trackback  Also see: Executive offices exempt from Executive orders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Staff cartoonist presents: Bush/Cheney Oncology Associates, or: &#8216;The war on&nbsp;tumor&#8217; June 25, 2007 Posted by Nick Langewis in cartooning, Dick Cheney, bush administration, executive branch criminality, democracy, George Bush, politics, comics, comedy, webcomics, humor. trackback  Also see: Executive offices exempt from Executive orders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-196</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Executive offices exempt from Executive Orders&lt;/strong&gt;

Earlier this week, I blogged on how the Office of the Vice President was claiming to be exempt from the Executive Orders governing the protection of national secrets. Now we have an update to this ongoing issue. According to this &#039;Washington Post&#039; st...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Executive offices exempt from Executive Orders</strong></p>
<p>Earlier this week, I blogged on how the Office of the Vice President was claiming to be exempt from the Executive Orders governing the protection of national secrets. Now we have an update to this ongoing issue. According to this &#8216;Washington Post&#8217; st&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fikshun</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>fikshun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 19:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-193</guid>
		<description>So, if Bush doesn&#039;t see his office as an executive office, despite the definition of the presidency as the chief executive, does that mean we don&#039;t have to impeach him to remove him from office?  Can we make this a cowardly sort of corporate move a la asking Milton from the film Office Space to simply move his office into the basement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if Bush doesn&#8217;t see his office as an executive office, despite the definition of the presidency as the chief executive, does that mean we don&#8217;t have to impeach him to remove him from office?  Can we make this a cowardly sort of corporate move a la asking Milton from the film Office Space to simply move his office into the basement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Jim, thanks for correcting my French - I took three years in high school, but that was a long time ago at this point, and I couldn&#039;t remember how to do the negative.

One of these days people will wake up.  I&#039;d like to see that happen before Bush leaves office, but people are still just hitting the snooze button over and over.  What we need is a political version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://nandahome.com/products.clocky.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clocky&lt;/a&gt;, the clock that runs away and hides after you hit the snooze bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, thanks for correcting my French &#8211; I took three years in high school, but that was a long time ago at this point, and I couldn&#8217;t remember how to do the negative.</p>
<p>One of these days people will wake up.  I&#8217;d like to see that happen before Bush leaves office, but people are still just hitting the snooze button over and over.  What we need is a political version of <a href="http://nandahome.com/products.clocky.html" rel="nofollow">Clocky</a>, the clock that runs away and hides after you hit the snooze bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Thanks for continuing to follow this story. As you note, there is nothing in the executive order(s) that exempts Bush or Cheney from oversight. Why it doesn&#039;t raise red flags for Americans that Dick Cheney wants exemption from any oversight of his doings as a public servant continues to baffle me.

Since Bush has now exempted both himself and Dickie boy from his own executive order, excuse me while I pimp another S&amp;R piece on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/19/bush-to-the-law-of-the-land-not-in-my-backyard/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bush&#039;s tendency to ignore the law - and/or treat it as if it doesn&#039;t apply&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;L&#039;etat, ce n&#039;est pas Bush&quot; -you&#039;re  killing  me....;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Thanks for continuing to follow this story. As you note, there is nothing in the executive order(s) that exempts Bush or Cheney from oversight. Why it doesn&#8217;t raise red flags for Americans that Dick Cheney wants exemption from any oversight of his doings as a public servant continues to baffle me.</p>
<p>Since Bush has now exempted both himself and Dickie boy from his own executive order, excuse me while I pimp another S&amp;R piece on <a href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/19/bush-to-the-law-of-the-land-not-in-my-backyard/" rel="nofollow">Bush&#8217;s tendency to ignore the law &#8211; and/or treat it as if it doesn&#8217;t apply</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;L&#8217;etat, ce n&#8217;est pas Bush&#8221; -you&#8217;re  killing  me&#8230;.;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts in the Daedalnexus</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/06/23/executive-offices-exempt-from-executive-orders/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts in the Daedalnexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=42#comment-197</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Taking Issue with So&#045;Called Exemptions from Executive Orders&lt;/strong&gt;

Executive Orders (EOs), unless they specifically exempt someone, apply to everyone in the Executive Branch.&#160; So how is it that the plainly worded language of an EO get ignored by both the President and the Vice President?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Taking Issue with So&#45;Called Exemptions from Executive Orders</strong></p>
<p>Executive Orders (EOs), unless they specifically exempt someone, apply to everyone in the Executive Branch.&nbsp; So how is it that the plainly worded language of an EO get ignored by both the President and the Vice President?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

