<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuit alleges mandatory Christianity in US military</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:43:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-13004</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-13004</guid>
		<description>about the thanksgiving dinner: I would be offended if I had to pray with an atheist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about the thanksgiving dinner: I would be offended if I had to pray with an atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6427</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6427</guid>
		<description>It would help if you&#039;d listen to what I&#039;m actually saying and respond to it instead of sidestepping, tapdancing and building strawmen.

&lt;i&gt;You still haven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would help if you&#8217;d listen to what I&#8217;m actually saying and respond to it instead of sidestepping, tapdancing and building strawmen.</p>
<p><i>You still haven</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6426</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6426</guid>
		<description>Man, is it hot in here, or is it the fever dream talking?  You still haven&#039;t made a case that religious faith equals threat of theocratic conspiracy.  The Christian Right, if there is such a thing, has been an increasingly small part of the political process in the past few election cycles.  Maybe that&#039;s why the Dems have taken control of Congress.

You obviously feel threatenend by faith, and I&#039;m sorry for that.  You don&#039;t have to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, is it hot in here, or is it the fever dream talking?  You still haven&#8217;t made a case that religious faith equals threat of theocratic conspiracy.  The Christian Right, if there is such a thing, has been an increasingly small part of the political process in the past few election cycles.  Maybe that&#8217;s why the Dems have taken control of Congress.</p>
<p>You obviously feel threatenend by faith, and I&#8217;m sorry for that.  You don&#8217;t have to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6429</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6429</guid>
		<description>Steve:

1: You never saw it, so it must not exist. I&#039;ve never seen Old Faithful - what do we conclude?

2: This isn&#039;t about concocting a &quot;conspiracy theory&quot; - nice try with rhetorical marginalization device, though. All people here are doing is quoting facts and eyewitness accounts. You have conveniently pretended that my post above never happened, but let&#039;s review anyway. Depending on the survey, over 70% of Americans are some variety of Christian. I&#039;ve seen a number of surveys, and nothing shows Christians comprising less than a supermajority. Nearly all of Congress professes to Christianity. And for the heck of it, can you point to the last president or major party presidential candidate who wasn&#039;t an avowed Christian? I don&#039;t think it&#039;s happened in my lifetime, and I was born a few days after Kennedy took office.

I do love your last line: &quot;There</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve:</p>
<p>1: You never saw it, so it must not exist. I&#8217;ve never seen Old Faithful &#8211; what do we conclude?</p>
<p>2: This isn&#8217;t about concocting a &#8220;conspiracy theory&#8221; &#8211; nice try with rhetorical marginalization device, though. All people here are doing is quoting facts and eyewitness accounts. You have conveniently pretended that my post above never happened, but let&#8217;s review anyway. Depending on the survey, over 70% of Americans are some variety of Christian. I&#8217;ve seen a number of surveys, and nothing shows Christians comprising less than a supermajority. Nearly all of Congress professes to Christianity. And for the heck of it, can you point to the last president or major party presidential candidate who wasn&#8217;t an avowed Christian? I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s happened in my lifetime, and I was born a few days after Kennedy took office.</p>
<p>I do love your last line: &#8220;There</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6430</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6430</guid>
		<description>Sunfell,
I take your point - politicians use ideology.  They use Christianity just as they used Free Silver, slavery/anti-slavery rhetoric, and many other hot button topics throughout history.  That&#039;s the business of politics, I suppose.  I would not condone the politicization (?) of faith, but neither would I restrict people of faith from engaging in the political process.

There&#039;s a difference here, though, and that is the apparent counter-reaction against Christians.  There&#039;s a very real desire here to marginalize Christians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunfell,<br />
I take your point &#8211; politicians use ideology.  They use Christianity just as they used Free Silver, slavery/anti-slavery rhetoric, and many other hot button topics throughout history.  That&#8217;s the business of politics, I suppose.  I would not condone the politicization (?) of faith, but neither would I restrict people of faith from engaging in the political process.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference here, though, and that is the apparent counter-reaction against Christians.  There&#8217;s a very real desire here to marginalize Christians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunfell</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunfell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>I am not offended by religion, Steve- I am offended by people who use religion and its believers as a tool to advance a political agenda. I don&#039;t care if you believe in Jesus, or the Blue Star Dog or nothing at all- that is not the point.

The point is that there are people who are callously using folks like you as tools and a source of funds to destroy our country.  You&#039;re just a walking wallet to them. Religion is just a tool for them. You&#039;re being used to advance a political agenda, not your faith.

I cannot make myself any clearer than that. Go ahead and lump me in with the firebrands if you must- but there&#039;s a pattern here that is not a good one for the future of this country. We are NOT coup-proof. We are not immune to corruption or collapse from within, no matter what people believe about God&#039;s blessings on this nation.

If your builder told you that you had a rotting floor in your home, would you dismiss him? Probably not. You&#039;d get it fixed. Our country is rotting right out from under us, and these faith-based phonies are accelerating the process. I don&#039;t think anyone- believer or not- will want to live in such a place. And even if you are a Christian, you will probably not be the &#039;correct&#039; sort.

But you have the right to see things as you wish- all I am trying to do is open eyes. You can choose to keep them closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not offended by religion, Steve- I am offended by people who use religion and its believers as a tool to advance a political agenda. I don&#8217;t care if you believe in Jesus, or the Blue Star Dog or nothing at all- that is not the point.</p>
<p>The point is that there are people who are callously using folks like you as tools and a source of funds to destroy our country.  You&#8217;re just a walking wallet to them. Religion is just a tool for them. You&#8217;re being used to advance a political agenda, not your faith.</p>
<p>I cannot make myself any clearer than that. Go ahead and lump me in with the firebrands if you must- but there&#8217;s a pattern here that is not a good one for the future of this country. We are NOT coup-proof. We are not immune to corruption or collapse from within, no matter what people believe about God&#8217;s blessings on this nation.</p>
<p>If your builder told you that you had a rotting floor in your home, would you dismiss him? Probably not. You&#8217;d get it fixed. Our country is rotting right out from under us, and these faith-based phonies are accelerating the process. I don&#8217;t think anyone- believer or not- will want to live in such a place. And even if you are a Christian, you will probably not be the &#8216;correct&#8217; sort.</p>
<p>But you have the right to see things as you wish- all I am trying to do is open eyes. You can choose to keep them closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunfell</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunfell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6433</guid>
		<description>I realize that to some, this whole mess is nothing to worry about, but I wonder how they&#039;d feel if another Christian sect literally stole their church and its property and holdings out from under them?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://chuckcurrie.blogs.com/chuck_currie/2007/05/steeplejacking_.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rev. Chuck Currie on &quot;Steeplejacking&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/53534/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More about this growing problem.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Steeplejacking-Christian-Hijacking-Mainstream-Religion/dp/097719728X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-2964127-2670463?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1190576133&amp;sr=1-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Steeplejacking&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that to some, this whole mess is nothing to worry about, but I wonder how they&#8217;d feel if another Christian sect literally stole their church and its property and holdings out from under them?</p>
<p><a href="http://chuckcurrie.blogs.com/chuck_currie/2007/05/steeplejacking_.html" rel="nofollow">Rev. Chuck Currie on &#8220;Steeplejacking&#8221;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/53534/" rel="nofollow">More about this growing problem.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Steeplejacking-Christian-Hijacking-Mainstream-Religion/dp/097719728X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-2964127-2670463?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1190576133&amp;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">Steeplejacking</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6432</guid>
		<description>Are there Christians who present their faith (and Christ) badly?  Sure, a handful.  Hardly a theocratic conspiracy.  There are also a lot more Muslims that give their religion a bad name.  Again, what&#039;s your point, and how does it add up to conspiracy?  It just doesn&#039;t.

I served graduated from the Air Force Academy (a few years after Mikey Weinstein&#039;s time there) and served for 24 years.  In all that time I never witnessed any of the scattered abuses that you, Sunfell, or Weinstein claim.  They may have happened, but if you were in a court of law, your evidence of a Grand Theocratic Conspiracy would be circumstantial at best.

Again, the American military is driven more by political correctness and opportunism than religion.  This is a free country - if you or Sunfell or Weinstein are offended by religion, stick your fingers in your ears and walk away.  Stop making up conspiracy theories that don&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there Christians who present their faith (and Christ) badly?  Sure, a handful.  Hardly a theocratic conspiracy.  There are also a lot more Muslims that give their religion a bad name.  Again, what&#8217;s your point, and how does it add up to conspiracy?  It just doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I served graduated from the Air Force Academy (a few years after Mikey Weinstein&#8217;s time there) and served for 24 years.  In all that time I never witnessed any of the scattered abuses that you, Sunfell, or Weinstein claim.  They may have happened, but if you were in a court of law, your evidence of a Grand Theocratic Conspiracy would be circumstantial at best.</p>
<p>Again, the American military is driven more by political correctness and opportunism than religion.  This is a free country &#8211; if you or Sunfell or Weinstein are offended by religion, stick your fingers in your ears and walk away.  Stop making up conspiracy theories that don&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6435</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6435</guid>
		<description>Steve: No, it can&#039;t, except that ... it is. You&#039;ve wandered in here with plenty of attitude on the subject, but best I can tell you haven&#039;t addressed a single point as set forth by Sunfell.

Maybe she just imagined all those things that happened to her firsthand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: No, it can&#8217;t, except that &#8230; it is. You&#8217;ve wandered in here with plenty of attitude on the subject, but best I can tell you haven&#8217;t addressed a single point as set forth by Sunfell.</p>
<p>Maybe she just imagined all those things that happened to her firsthand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be a Part of the Conspiracy &#171; Careful Thought II</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6434</link>
		<dc:creator>Be a Part of the Conspiracy &#171; Careful Thought II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6434</guid>
		<description>[...] tactic is to latch onto isolated cases of &#8216;Fundamentalist oppression&#8217; or faith-related pronouncements by public figures, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tactic is to latch onto isolated cases of &#8216;Fundamentalist oppression&#8217; or faith-related pronouncements by public figures, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6428</guid>
		<description>Ah, you must be right.  Beware my wrath - I am Fundy.  Fear me...  It&#039;s times like this that remind of the old Air Force Academy motto: When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout.

Christianity can&#039;t be mandated or legislated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you must be right.  Beware my wrath &#8211; I am Fundy.  Fear me&#8230;  It&#8217;s times like this that remind of the old Air Force Academy motto: When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout.</p>
<p>Christianity can&#8217;t be mandated or legislated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6425</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6425</guid>
		<description>No, Steve, you&#039;re really, REALLY not getting it.

1: Yes, it has always been a &quot;Christian nation,&quot; statistically if not Constitutionally. I think we all get this.

2: Why are we not a theocracy? Well, I think you need to ask yourself what you&#039;d call a system where all legislation must run the gauntlet of the situation I describe in my previous comment. What is it called when you can&#039;t be elected president unless you active pronounce your commitment to a particular faith. What do you call a society where scores of activities are outlawed because they contravene the laws of a particular faith?

3: What&#039;s changed? No, Steve, we have not evolved a new class of folks. What&#039;s happened since the mid- to late-70s is that Christianity has been politicized. As Sunfell&#039;s comment notes, we have have the religion hijacked by powermongering political interests.

Of course, I guess none of this is particularly disturbing - maybe not even noticeable - to those who are a part of the fundie takeover machine....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Steve, you&#8217;re really, REALLY not getting it.</p>
<p>1: Yes, it has always been a &#8220;Christian nation,&#8221; statistically if not Constitutionally. I think we all get this.</p>
<p>2: Why are we not a theocracy? Well, I think you need to ask yourself what you&#8217;d call a system where all legislation must run the gauntlet of the situation I describe in my previous comment. What is it called when you can&#8217;t be elected president unless you active pronounce your commitment to a particular faith. What do you call a society where scores of activities are outlawed because they contravene the laws of a particular faith?</p>
<p>3: What&#8217;s changed? No, Steve, we have not evolved a new class of folks. What&#8217;s happened since the mid- to late-70s is that Christianity has been politicized. As Sunfell&#8217;s comment notes, we have have the religion hijacked by powermongering political interests.</p>
<p>Of course, I guess none of this is particularly disturbing &#8211; maybe not even noticeable &#8211; to those who are a part of the fundie takeover machine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6424</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6424</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Really, all you have are:

- the president
- the vice president
- most of the Supreme Court
- a vast majority of both houses on Congress
- a vast majority of the governors and legislators in the 50 states
- all the major presidential candidates in both parties
- a significant majority of the population of the nation&lt;/i&gt;

Gee, maybe it&#039;s a Christian nation, after all.  Surprise, surprise.  So why hasn&#039;t the fever dream of an American theocracy comes to pass in the last 250 years?  After all, there was certainly a greater percentage of the population that professed and practiced the faith in the past.  Why the sudden paranoia?  Abraham Lincoln was actually more vocal about his faith than George Bush ever was.

I think it comes down to a new class of folks who feel they have a right to be offended, and that somebody better do something about it, by God.  A handful of Christians in positions of authority transmogrifies into a dominationist conspiracy.  Help me, Obi Wan, you&#039;re my only hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Really, all you have are:</p>
<p>- the president<br />
- the vice president<br />
- most of the Supreme Court<br />
- a vast majority of both houses on Congress<br />
- a vast majority of the governors and legislators in the 50 states<br />
- all the major presidential candidates in both parties<br />
- a significant majority of the population of the nation</i></p>
<p>Gee, maybe it&#8217;s a Christian nation, after all.  Surprise, surprise.  So why hasn&#8217;t the fever dream of an American theocracy comes to pass in the last 250 years?  After all, there was certainly a greater percentage of the population that professed and practiced the faith in the past.  Why the sudden paranoia?  Abraham Lincoln was actually more vocal about his faith than George Bush ever was.</p>
<p>I think it comes down to a new class of folks who feel they have a right to be offended, and that somebody better do something about it, by God.  A handful of Christians in positions of authority transmogrifies into a dominationist conspiracy.  Help me, Obi Wan, you&#8217;re my only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunfell</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6423</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunfell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6423</guid>
		<description>I actually do know the difference between left, right, center, moderate, evangelical, fundamentalist, mainlaine, dominionist, and all the others. I know that religious belief has degrees. I also know that evangelical or fundamentalist does not automatically mean theocratic. Heck, if you had a few hours or days to spare, I could tell you the exact theological differences, sect by sect.

But you&#039;re probably not interested in that. Or interested in mainline churches being &#039;steeplejacked&#039; and their congregations taken apart by hard-right Christians. Or the huge schism that creedalized the Southern Baptist Convention and turned it into an element of the hard right. Or the deliberate and systematic takeover of low power community FM radio licenses by large hard-right religious broascasters- a trend that was so bad that the FCC finally had to halt processing of licenses in that area.

I&#039;ve been studying and tracking this trend in religion for years. I have been watching religious people get swept away by politics, and watched people play the &#039;faith card&#039; to get into the pockets and the trust of the faithful, who are constantly filled with fear, uncertainty and doubt to keep that money flowing.

It isn&#039;t religion I am worried about, it&#039;s a political takeover using religion as the Trojan Horse. In my studies and travels, I have run into people of faith who are as baffled and horrified with what is happening as I am. Genuine Christians are an endangered species. They are being overrun and silenced by fanatics using them as a means to get into power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually do know the difference between left, right, center, moderate, evangelical, fundamentalist, mainlaine, dominionist, and all the others. I know that religious belief has degrees. I also know that evangelical or fundamentalist does not automatically mean theocratic. Heck, if you had a few hours or days to spare, I could tell you the exact theological differences, sect by sect.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re probably not interested in that. Or interested in mainline churches being &#8217;steeplejacked&#8217; and their congregations taken apart by hard-right Christians. Or the huge schism that creedalized the Southern Baptist Convention and turned it into an element of the hard right. Or the deliberate and systematic takeover of low power community FM radio licenses by large hard-right religious broascasters- a trend that was so bad that the FCC finally had to halt processing of licenses in that area.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been studying and tracking this trend in religion for years. I have been watching religious people get swept away by politics, and watched people play the &#8216;faith card&#8217; to get into the pockets and the trust of the faithful, who are constantly filled with fear, uncertainty and doubt to keep that money flowing.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t religion I am worried about, it&#8217;s a political takeover using religion as the Trojan Horse. In my studies and travels, I have run into people of faith who are as baffled and horrified with what is happening as I am. Genuine Christians are an endangered species. They are being overrun and silenced by fanatics using them as a means to get into power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6422</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6422</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Steve, you&#039;re right. Every mention of Christianity indicates Leftist paranoia. That&#039;s why Christians are in such danger of being of being completely stamped out. I mean, Jesus (if you&#039;ll forgive the expression), there are so few Christians left. Really, all you have are:

- the president
-  the vice president
-  most of the Supreme Court
-  a vast majority of both houses on Congress
 - a vast majority of the governors and legislators in the 50 states
 - all the major presidential candidates in both parties
 - a significant majority of the population of the nation

Thankfully, we have bright-eyed thinkers like you noting that you just can&#039;t mention Jesus in public anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Steve, you&#8217;re right. Every mention of Christianity indicates Leftist paranoia. That&#8217;s why Christians are in such danger of being of being completely stamped out. I mean, Jesus (if you&#8217;ll forgive the expression), there are so few Christians left. Really, all you have are:</p>
<p>- the president<br />
-  the vice president<br />
-  most of the Supreme Court<br />
-  a vast majority of both houses on Congress<br />
 &#8211; a vast majority of the governors and legislators in the 50 states<br />
 &#8211; all the major presidential candidates in both parties<br />
 &#8211; a significant majority of the population of the nation</p>
<p>Thankfully, we have bright-eyed thinkers like you noting that you just can&#8217;t mention Jesus in public anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6421</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6421</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and again, I don&#039;t dispute that evangelicals can be overly aggressive.  And I don&#039;t even dispute that there is a dangerous brew, in some (but only some) strands (and they are not more than strands) of evangelical Christendom (especially in the south), of Christianity and nationalism.

But let&#039;s have a reasonable conversation about what differentiates a healthy patriotism from unhealthy nationalism, rather than these absurd allusions to the &quot;Talibanization&quot; of the military and the &quot;fragging&quot; of Pat Tillman.

And if you&#039;re going to claim that yours is the side that sees the ambiguities and subtleties in the world, then you can start by recognizing the differences between fundamentalist and evangelical, and then the differences between left, right, and centrist evangelical, and then the differences even within conservative evangelicalism.  The world is far too complicated a place, and human nature far too fractious, for any group so large to be painted with a single brush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and again, I don&#8217;t dispute that evangelicals can be overly aggressive.  And I don&#8217;t even dispute that there is a dangerous brew, in some (but only some) strands (and they are not more than strands) of evangelical Christendom (especially in the south), of Christianity and nationalism.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s have a reasonable conversation about what differentiates a healthy patriotism from unhealthy nationalism, rather than these absurd allusions to the &#8220;Talibanization&#8221; of the military and the &#8220;fragging&#8221; of Pat Tillman.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re going to claim that yours is the side that sees the ambiguities and subtleties in the world, then you can start by recognizing the differences between fundamentalist and evangelical, and then the differences between left, right, and centrist evangelical, and then the differences even within conservative evangelicalism.  The world is far too complicated a place, and human nature far too fractious, for any group so large to be painted with a single brush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6420</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6420</guid>
		<description>friendsofjustice,
You&#039;re right.  Any mention of Christianity in society is automatically dubbed evidence of theocracy.  Fever dreams of the left, is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>friendsofjustice,<br />
You&#8217;re right.  Any mention of Christianity in society is automatically dubbed evidence of theocracy.  Fever dreams of the left, is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6394</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6394</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the Wide World of Make Believe.  i don&#039;t doubt that there are chaplains who are overly aggressive, and I don&#039;t doubt that sometimes people (Christians too, and yes, even evangelical Christians) are mistreated because of their religious beliefs.  I&#039;m sorry if you&#039;ve experienced that; it&#039;s not right.

To equate this with the Taliban, however, to say it&#039;s just as dangerous as al-Qaida terrorism, to suggest Tilman was killed for this, and then to raise the prospect of a fundamentalist millenarian military turning against all non-Christians is absurd and paranoid.  This is what&#039;s called demonization, and it&#039;s an excellent illustration of how demonization is the enemy of rational thought.  You have ascribed such horrible motives and character to a group you dislike that now you believe they&#039;re capable of anything.

What&#039;s your evidence that evangelicals in the military are going to enforce evangelicalism in the US and purge the rest.  This is it, this is all you have: someone said, and you suspect this of others too, that they believe their commitment to God outweighs their commitment to country, and that they are interested in sharing the gospel along the way.  Yeah, man, really scary stuff.

When you find yourself thinking things like this, you need to get outside of the echo chamber.  You owe it to yourself, and you owe it to intellectual integrity, to try harder to understand different points of view.  Make sure you&#039;re not getting all your news from one &quot;side&quot; or the other.  Find the best opposing argument you can find to your own; don&#039;t deal in paper tigers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Wide World of Make Believe.  i don&#8217;t doubt that there are chaplains who are overly aggressive, and I don&#8217;t doubt that sometimes people (Christians too, and yes, even evangelical Christians) are mistreated because of their religious beliefs.  I&#8217;m sorry if you&#8217;ve experienced that; it&#8217;s not right.</p>
<p>To equate this with the Taliban, however, to say it&#8217;s just as dangerous as al-Qaida terrorism, to suggest Tilman was killed for this, and then to raise the prospect of a fundamentalist millenarian military turning against all non-Christians is absurd and paranoid.  This is what&#8217;s called demonization, and it&#8217;s an excellent illustration of how demonization is the enemy of rational thought.  You have ascribed such horrible motives and character to a group you dislike that now you believe they&#8217;re capable of anything.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your evidence that evangelicals in the military are going to enforce evangelicalism in the US and purge the rest.  This is it, this is all you have: someone said, and you suspect this of others too, that they believe their commitment to God outweighs their commitment to country, and that they are interested in sharing the gospel along the way.  Yeah, man, really scary stuff.</p>
<p>When you find yourself thinking things like this, you need to get outside of the echo chamber.  You owe it to yourself, and you owe it to intellectual integrity, to try harder to understand different points of view.  Make sure you&#8217;re not getting all your news from one &#8220;side&#8221; or the other.  Find the best opposing argument you can find to your own; don&#8217;t deal in paper tigers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: friendsofjustice</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6419</link>
		<dc:creator>friendsofjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6419</guid>
		<description>The problem is, the terms &quot;theocracy&quot; and &quot;fundamentalist nutjob&quot; are tossed around so loosely in the American Left these days, it&#039;s hard to tell when I should really be worried.  Most of the time, when people warn me that America is threatened by theocratic authoritarians, they&#039;re crying wolf.  Now, when the threat is real, I have trouble knowing whether people are just using these terms rhetorically or if there really is a problem.  I wish I could hear more Evangelical Christians talking about this problem, so I could trust that this isn&#039;t just about people who have such high standards of secularism in public life than any breach is labelled &quot;theocracy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is, the terms &#8220;theocracy&#8221; and &#8220;fundamentalist nutjob&#8221; are tossed around so loosely in the American Left these days, it&#8217;s hard to tell when I should really be worried.  Most of the time, when people warn me that America is threatened by theocratic authoritarians, they&#8217;re crying wolf.  Now, when the threat is real, I have trouble knowing whether people are just using these terms rhetorically or if there really is a problem.  I wish I could hear more Evangelical Christians talking about this problem, so I could trust that this isn&#8217;t just about people who have such high standards of secularism in public life than any breach is labelled &#8220;theocracy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/09/20/lawsuit-alleges-mandantory-christianity-in-us-military/comment-page-1/#comment-6406</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=840#comment-6406</guid>
		<description>The thing that is scary is that people would actually believe some chaplains and a few Christians pose a threat to life as we know it.  Once again, Mikey Weinstein&#039;s fever dream raises its ugly head...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that is scary is that people would actually believe some chaplains and a few Christians pose a threat to life as we know it.  Once again, Mikey Weinstein&#8217;s fever dream raises its ugly head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
