<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-voting screwup leads judge to void election results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/10/02/e-voting-screwup-leads-judge-to-void-election-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/10/02/e-voting-screwup-leads-judge-to-void-election-results/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; E-voting company slapped with lawsuits for terminal stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/10/02/e-voting-screwup-leads-judge-to-void-election-results/comment-page-1/#comment-8559</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; E-voting company slapped with lawsuits for terminal stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=498#comment-8559</guid>
		<description>[...] responsibility of the public infrastructure is placed in the hands of a private company and they drop the ball, it makes voters that much more disenfranchised and uninterested in participating in the process. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] responsibility of the public infrastructure is placed in the hands of a private company and they drop the ball, it makes voters that much more disenfranchised and uninterested in participating in the process. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Silvey</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/10/02/e-voting-screwup-leads-judge-to-void-election-results/comment-page-1/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Silvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=498#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>We Berkeleyans knew the fix was in when marijuana lost. Not the will of the people, you know. A bit more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=26244&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;info on the content here&lt;/a&gt;, from &lt;em&gt;The Daily Cal&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We Berkeleyans knew the fix was in when marijuana lost. Not the will of the people, you know. A bit more <a href="http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=26244" rel="nofollow">info on the content here</a>, from <em>The Daily Cal</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/10/02/e-voting-screwup-leads-judge-to-void-election-results/comment-page-1/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=498#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>Where in hell are the contempt-of-court citations? Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where in hell are the contempt-of-court citations? Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/10/02/e-voting-screwup-leads-judge-to-void-election-results/comment-page-1/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=498#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>Jeez. Well, the good news here is that cases like this remove the discussion from the realm of the hypothetical. If you can&#039;t execute on a little old vote like this, how significant is the risk when you&#039;re talking about something the size of a general election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez. Well, the good news here is that cases like this remove the discussion from the realm of the hypothetical. If you can&#8217;t execute on a little old vote like this, how significant is the risk when you&#8217;re talking about something the size of a general election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

