<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New polls revive electability questions for Hillary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jesus Doesn&#8217;t Want Santa for a Sunbeam&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10360</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jesus Doesn&#8217;t Want Santa for a Sunbeam&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-10360</guid>
		<description>[...] be able to buy it - with the proviso that they must move with it to another planet - and take both Clintons and Mike Huckabee with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be able to buy it &#8211; with the proviso that they must move with it to another planet &#8211; and take both Clintons and Mike Huckabee with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>Ok, it is official Hillary will lead this country if Giuliani gets the republican ticket. I watched the debate tonight and hoped that Giuliani would break away from the pack. However, instead of him performing at his best, I saw him act like a bully. He may lovable to some, but he is not logical at all. He may have the majority vote in some polls, but the majority is not always right. In history we can see this. Hitler had the majority vote at one point, while Martin Luther King was fighting for the minorities. The majority vote does not make anyone man right regardless of there political party. Iâ€™m sorry Rudy Giuliani, but I can not give you my vote. Iâ€™m must vote for one who not only compassionate and consistent but also for one who is correct.

This is why I am voting for Mike Huckabee:

It is not because he is religious
It is not because he is republican
It is simple because he is RIGHT!

Faith, Family, Freedomâ€¦FOVEVER!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, it is official Hillary will lead this country if Giuliani gets the republican ticket. I watched the debate tonight and hoped that Giuliani would break away from the pack. However, instead of him performing at his best, I saw him act like a bully. He may lovable to some, but he is not logical at all. He may have the majority vote in some polls, but the majority is not always right. In history we can see this. Hitler had the majority vote at one point, while Martin Luther King was fighting for the minorities. The majority vote does not make anyone man right regardless of there political party. Iâ€™m sorry Rudy Giuliani, but I can not give you my vote. Iâ€™m must vote for one who not only compassionate and consistent but also for one who is correct.</p>
<p>This is why I am voting for Mike Huckabee:</p>
<p>It is not because he is religious<br />
It is not because he is republican<br />
It is simple because he is RIGHT!</p>
<p>Faith, Family, Freedomâ€¦FOVEVER!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8882</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8882</guid>
		<description>&quot;crazy fundie theocrat like Huckabee&quot;

What, you don&#039;t buy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/25/AR2007112501547.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Novak&#039;s criticism&lt;/a&gt; of Huckabee as a fake conservative?  Oh, come on, why not?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;crazy fundie theocrat like Huckabee&#8221;</p>
<p>What, you don&#8217;t buy <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/25/AR2007112501547.html" rel="nofollow">Novak&#8217;s criticism</a> of Huckabee as a fake conservative?  Oh, come on, why not?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8881</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8881</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently learned an important lesson that everyone should probably learn:  always, &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;ALWAYS&lt;/strong&gt; look at the source of the poll, the questions, and the data before accepting its conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently learned an important lesson that everyone should probably learn:  always, <em>always</em>, <strong>ALWAYS</strong> look at the source of the poll, the questions, and the data before accepting its conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8879</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8879</guid>
		<description>Sad what we&#039;re (not you, all of us) reduced to. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad what we&#8217;re (not you, all of us) reduced to. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8875</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8875</guid>
		<description>If there&#039;s one thing Bush v. Gore taught us (beyond how easy it is to steal an election), it&#039;s that every single vote counts. I keep this in mind any  time my own stomach wavers at the thought of putting a corporatist Repub-lite like Hillary in office....because as bad as she could potentially be, she isn&#039;t nearly the threat that a rapacious fascist like Ghouliani or a crazy fundie theocrat like Huckabee is. 

If it&#039;s bad vs. evil, bad wins every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one thing Bush v. Gore taught us (beyond how easy it is to steal an election), it&#8217;s that every single vote counts. I keep this in mind any  time my own stomach wavers at the thought of putting a corporatist Repub-lite like Hillary in office&#8230;.because as bad as she could potentially be, she isn&#8217;t nearly the threat that a rapacious fascist like Ghouliani or a crazy fundie theocrat like Huckabee is. </p>
<p>If it&#8217;s bad vs. evil, bad wins every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8873</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8873</guid>
		<description>I give you credit, Martin. My stomach is just too sensitive, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give you credit, Martin. My stomach is just too sensitive, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be too confident in the Zogby poll, particularly since the guy himself has an agenda, it seems: 
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/11/20/172235/81

This doesn&#039;t take away from the fact that Clinton is not the best face the Democrats should be putting forward, but it&#039;s a reminder that things like this are planted in the news cycle with specific intent--in this case, to fan or magnify doubt in people&#039;s minds. 

I learned my lesson in 2000. Pulling the lever for Nader gave us eight years of the worst Presidency in modern history, if not the whole of American history. I&#039;d vote for every single Dem running, all the way down to Mike Gravel, and then MAYBE Ron Paul, before I pulled the lever for Ghouliani or Huckabee or one of those clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be too confident in the Zogby poll, particularly since the guy himself has an agenda, it seems:<br />
<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/11/20/172235/81" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/11/20/172235/81</a></p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t take away from the fact that Clinton is not the best face the Democrats should be putting forward, but it&#8217;s a reminder that things like this are planted in the news cycle with specific intent&#8211;in this case, to fan or magnify doubt in people&#8217;s minds. </p>
<p>I learned my lesson in 2000. Pulling the lever for Nader gave us eight years of the worst Presidency in modern history, if not the whole of American history. I&#8217;d vote for every single Dem running, all the way down to Mike Gravel, and then MAYBE Ron Paul, before I pulled the lever for Ghouliani or Huckabee or one of those clowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8865</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8865</guid>
		<description>Democrats think all the money and corporate support that accrues to her is like an imprimatur that she&#039;s designated for president-hood.

You can even tell me that if I don&#039;t vote for her it will be like voting for Nader instead of Gore in 2000 (which I did). 

The head knows the Republicans need to be stopped at whatever cost. Yet my hand won&#039;t obey and flip the lever for her in the voting booth (yes, they still have them in my district).

They gotta find somebody who doesn&#039;t trigger the gag reflex in so many of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats think all the money and corporate support that accrues to her is like an imprimatur that she&#8217;s designated for president-hood.</p>
<p>You can even tell me that if I don&#8217;t vote for her it will be like voting for Nader instead of Gore in 2000 (which I did). </p>
<p>The head knows the Republicans need to be stopped at whatever cost. Yet my hand won&#8217;t obey and flip the lever for her in the voting booth (yes, they still have them in my district).</p>
<p>They gotta find somebody who doesn&#8217;t trigger the gag reflex in so many of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New polls revive electability questions for Hillary &#124; Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>New polls revive electability questions for Hillary &#124; Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/26/new-polls-revive-electability-questions-for-hillary/#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Dr. Slammy         This was written by . Posted on Monday, November 26, 2007, at 5:23 pm. Filed under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Dr. Slammy         This was written by . Posted on Monday, November 26, 2007, at 5:23 pm. Filed under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

