<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Berate, You Deride &#8211; A closer look at the background of Steven J. Milloy, executive director of DemandDebate.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:32:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; ExxonMobil&#8217;s ironic ally: Steve Milloy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/comment-page-1/#comment-40818</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; ExxonMobil&#8217;s ironic ally: Steve Milloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/#comment-40818</guid>
		<description>[...] But the very first resolution to be voted on is not one that&#8217;s supported by the Rockefeller family. In fact, the very first resolution to be voted on is one that would specifically ban resolutions that qualify as &#8220;shareholder activism,&#8221; supposedly like the resolutions supported by the Rockefellers. And the first resolution was introduced by the Free Enterprise Action Fund (FEAFund), a mutual fund founded and managed by none other than S&amp;R&#8217;s own favorite purveyor of global heating propaganda, Steven J. Milloy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But the very first resolution to be voted on is not one that&#8217;s supported by the Rockefeller family. In fact, the very first resolution to be voted on is one that would specifically ban resolutions that qualify as &#8220;shareholder activism,&#8221; supposedly like the resolutions supported by the Rockefellers. And the first resolution was introduced by the Free Enterprise Action Fund (FEAFund), a mutual fund founded and managed by none other than S&#38;R&#8217;s own favorite purveyor of global heating propaganda, Steven J. Milloy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Wal*Mart goes &#8220;moo&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/comment-page-1/#comment-27643</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Wal*Mart goes &#8220;moo&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/#comment-27643</guid>
		<description>[...] if people like Steve Milloy, who is paid to manipulate public perceptions of scientific data via this astro-turf website among [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if people like Steve Milloy, who is paid to manipulate public perceptions of scientific data via this astro-turf website among [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/comment-page-1/#comment-9138</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/#comment-9138</guid>
		<description>Luckyleif - check out my own extensive discussions of these issues &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Note that not a single one of the myths I&#039;ve debunked relies on Al Gore.  If you would like to continue this discussion, let&#039;s take it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckyleif &#8211; check out my own extensive discussions of these issues <a href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/07/23/anti-global-heating-claims-a-reasonably-thorough-debunking/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  Note that not a single one of the myths I&#8217;ve debunked relies on Al Gore.  If you would like to continue this discussion, let&#8217;s take it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luckyleif</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/comment-page-1/#comment-9128</link>
		<dc:creator>luckyleif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/#comment-9128</guid>
		<description>I see too many blogs that waste our time arguing about annual temperature differences (US, world, upper air, whatever) that differ from one another (or &quot;the hottest&quot;) by less than the margin of error of the measurements. For the US historical measurements on the GISTEMP website, the annual margin of error is 0.1 C; for the 5-year averages, it&#039;s 0.045 C. Whatever your political inclinations, I&#039;ll grant you whatever &quot;warmest year&quot; you want, especially if its difference from the next &quot;warmest year&quot; is within the error margin. BTW, trends fitted to the 127 year record, or any part of it, have NO validity in forecasting any future year. I don&#039;t care about any &quot;hockey sticks&quot; either. FOCUS, people!

Now, if you&#039;re at all serious, tell me why you accept - actively or passively - Mr. Gore&#039;s blatant lies in Inconvenient Truth about the inconvenient Milankovitch Cycle. That&#039;s the 400,000 year cycle of temperature change, due ONLY and TOTALLY to astronomical factors, as calculated 60+ years ago by an obscure Serbian mathematician. Gore not only claims the cycle is due to CO2; he assigns the magnitude of the change (~12 C) as well to CO2. It&#039;s well-known (even at RealClimate.org) that the temp change preceeds the CO2 change by hundreds of years.

If you don&#039;t know what this comment is about, go look up &quot;Milankovitch&quot; in an encyclopedia. Next, look at the current point on the cycle (even as presented by Gore). Think about what&#039;s next. Hint: look at the previous 300,000 years. What went up, will come down. If you believe Gore is honest, tell us why. If you don&#039;t believe Gore, where have you been all this time?

I&#039;ll come back here sometime to see if there&#039;s any answer, or you can respond to my website at www.colo-earthfriends.org. I&#039;m unimpressed by profanity, obscenity, scatology, or gangsta&#039; rap, but if that&#039;s what you need.......

luckyleif@colo-earthfriends.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see too many blogs that waste our time arguing about annual temperature differences (US, world, upper air, whatever) that differ from one another (or &#8220;the hottest&#8221;) by less than the margin of error of the measurements. For the US historical measurements on the GISTEMP website, the annual margin of error is 0.1 C; for the 5-year averages, it&#8217;s 0.045 C. Whatever your political inclinations, I&#8217;ll grant you whatever &#8220;warmest year&#8221; you want, especially if its difference from the next &#8220;warmest year&#8221; is within the error margin. BTW, trends fitted to the 127 year record, or any part of it, have NO validity in forecasting any future year. I don&#8217;t care about any &#8220;hockey sticks&#8221; either. FOCUS, people!</p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;re at all serious, tell me why you accept &#8211; actively or passively &#8211; Mr. Gore&#8217;s blatant lies in Inconvenient Truth about the inconvenient Milankovitch Cycle. That&#8217;s the 400,000 year cycle of temperature change, due ONLY and TOTALLY to astronomical factors, as calculated 60+ years ago by an obscure Serbian mathematician. Gore not only claims the cycle is due to CO2; he assigns the magnitude of the change (~12 C) as well to CO2. It&#8217;s well-known (even at RealClimate.org) that the temp change preceeds the CO2 change by hundreds of years.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t know what this comment is about, go look up &#8220;Milankovitch&#8221; in an encyclopedia. Next, look at the current point on the cycle (even as presented by Gore). Think about what&#8217;s next. Hint: look at the previous 300,000 years. What went up, will come down. If you believe Gore is honest, tell us why. If you don&#8217;t believe Gore, where have you been all this time?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll come back here sometime to see if there&#8217;s any answer, or you can respond to my website at <a href="http://www.colo-earthfriends.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.colo-earthfriends.org</a>. I&#8217;m unimpressed by profanity, obscenity, scatology, or gangsta&#8217; rap, but if that&#8217;s what you need&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:luckyleif@colo-earthfriends.org">luckyleif@colo-earthfriends.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/comment-page-1/#comment-8913</link>
		<dc:creator>JS O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/#comment-8913</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Just an amazing rundown and, clearly, an amazing amount of work.

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Just an amazing rundown and, clearly, an amazing amount of work.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; We Berate, You Deride - DemandDebate.com&#8217;s survey on the scientific consensus surrounding global heating</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/comment-page-1/#comment-8880</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; We Berate, You Deride - DemandDebate.com&#8217;s survey on the scientific consensus surrounding global heating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/11/27/we-berate-you-deride-a-closer-look-at-the-background-of-steven-j-milloy-executive-director-of-demanddebatecom/#comment-8880</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 - A closer look at the background of Steven J. Milloy, executive director of DemandDebate.com    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 2 &#8211; A closer look at the background of Steven J. Milloy, executive director of DemandDebate.com    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
