<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oprah: The Un-Hillary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10082</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10082</guid>
		<description>Come on people - let&#039;s keep this on topic and avoid getting personal. This is America, and we benefit from the clash of IDEAS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on people &#8211; let&#8217;s keep this on topic and avoid getting personal. This is America, and we benefit from the clash of IDEAS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10081</link>
		<dc:creator>DomPierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10081</guid>
		<description>Maybe like Jesus&#039; General, you should start signing your posts with &lt;i&gt;Heterosexually Yours&lt;/i&gt; instead &quot;Jeff&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe like Jesus&#8217; General, you should start signing your posts with <i>Heterosexually Yours</i> instead &#8220;Jeff&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10079</link>
		<dc:creator>DomPierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10079</guid>
		<description>Yeah, my &quot;Ps: If I&#039;m elected&quot; shows when I use a smiley I know the art of tongue-in-cheek.  Besides, I know how temperamental some alleged &quot;conservatives&quot; are when I bring up the Bolshevik &amp; Czar Nicholas option.  ;)

As far as card-carrying Republicans, it normally means people put party above country no matter what.  Germans did that with Hitler. There&#039;s a term for that: it called brainwashed.

And btw, don&#039;t confuse supposed &quot;irrational emotion&quot; with a failure of some people to understand and appreciate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  

You know Jeff, you mentioning your &quot;lovely wife&quot;, but I can&#039;t recall anyone asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, my &#8220;Ps: If I&#8217;m elected&#8221; shows when I use a smiley I know the art of tongue-in-cheek.  Besides, I know how temperamental some alleged &#8220;conservatives&#8221; are when I bring up the Bolshevik &amp; Czar Nicholas option.  <img src='http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As far as card-carrying Republicans, it normally means people put party above country no matter what.  Germans did that with Hitler. There&#8217;s a term for that: it called brainwashed.</p>
<p>And btw, don&#8217;t confuse supposed &#8220;irrational emotion&#8221; with a failure of some people to understand and appreciate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  </p>
<p>You know Jeff, you mentioning your &#8220;lovely wife&#8221;, but I can&#8217;t recall anyone asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10072</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10072</guid>
		<description>Actually I didn&#039;t really say much about the Clintons in S&amp;R except in a previous comment. There I said that despite the fact that Bill was a lying sack of shit, he was a pretty decent president. I guess you&#039;re right that it does say a lot about me....that I am capable of rational tolerence without being blinded by irrational emotion.

Yeah, Hillary was a Goldwater gal, but then again my lovely wife was one of Gus Hall&#039;s biggest supporters in the 70&#039;s......people change.

As a card carrying Republican, neither myself or any of my fellow Republicans would even remotely consider Hillary to have a&quot;Liberal Republican&quot; philosophy.  

Actually, that &quot;PS:If I&#039;m elected&quot;  speaks volumes about you.  

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I didn&#8217;t really say much about the Clintons in S&amp;R except in a previous comment. There I said that despite the fact that Bill was a lying sack of shit, he was a pretty decent president. I guess you&#8217;re right that it does say a lot about me&#8230;.that I am capable of rational tolerence without being blinded by irrational emotion.</p>
<p>Yeah, Hillary was a Goldwater gal, but then again my lovely wife was one of Gus Hall&#8217;s biggest supporters in the 70&#8242;s&#8230;&#8230;people change.</p>
<p>As a card carrying Republican, neither myself or any of my fellow Republicans would even remotely consider Hillary to have a&#8221;Liberal Republican&#8221; philosophy.  </p>
<p>Actually, that &#8220;PS:If I&#8217;m elected&#8221;  speaks volumes about you.  </p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10071</link>
		<dc:creator>DomPierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10071</guid>
		<description>Someone should really do a better job on their homework.  Hillary was a Republican early on from her college days to her support for Goldwater&#039;s run.  She still has what can be described as a &quot;liberal Republican&quot; philosophy.  And btw, Bill is closer philosophically to former Arkansas governor Win Rockefeller than he is to JFK.

What you say about the Clintons, says more about you than it does them.

And don&#039;t worry, Hillary won&#039;t be the Dem nominee; she&#039;ll find her wheels are coming off early on.  On both parties, the field is still wide open and even a third party could make a serious challenge.

The question that should be asked, is why the Bushes (41 &amp; 43) are still walking around free.  

The current two-party system has one party that is wholly-owned, corrupt and without values, and another party that is inept, corrupt, and without values.   

What exactly is there to vote for?

Ps; If I&#039;m elected, I&#039;ll answer your other questions.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should really do a better job on their homework.  Hillary was a Republican early on from her college days to her support for Goldwater&#8217;s run.  She still has what can be described as a &#8220;liberal Republican&#8221; philosophy.  And btw, Bill is closer philosophically to former Arkansas governor Win Rockefeller than he is to JFK.</p>
<p>What you say about the Clintons, says more about you than it does them.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t worry, Hillary won&#8217;t be the Dem nominee; she&#8217;ll find her wheels are coming off early on.  On both parties, the field is still wide open and even a third party could make a serious challenge.</p>
<p>The question that should be asked, is why the Bushes (41 &amp; 43) are still walking around free.  </p>
<p>The current two-party system has one party that is wholly-owned, corrupt and without values, and another party that is inept, corrupt, and without values.   </p>
<p>What exactly is there to vote for?</p>
<p>Ps; If I&#8217;m elected, I&#8217;ll answer your other questions.  <img src='http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10066</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10066</guid>
		<description>A progressive dictator......Hmmmmm, that&#039;s interesting.  

What would be the penalty for disobeying a progressive dictator?  What would they do to you for opposing a progressive dictator? Would a progressive dictator show the cherished liberal tolerance(?) for opposing political views?  I guess we&#039;ll find out if Hillary gets elected.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A progressive dictator&#8230;&#8230;Hmmmmm, that&#8217;s interesting.  </p>
<p>What would be the penalty for disobeying a progressive dictator?  What would they do to you for opposing a progressive dictator? Would a progressive dictator show the cherished liberal tolerance(?) for opposing political views?  I guess we&#8217;ll find out if Hillary gets elected.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10064</link>
		<dc:creator>DomPierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10064</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s true.  

But.

Here&#039;s the reality.  Bush and the Republicans have been extremely successful at getting what they want, even when the Dems are in charge.  Think about how far along the progressives would be if they played the game the way the GOP played it.

People will have to admit that that the current form of government and political system in its current state will have to fall before any changes occur.

To clean up the current mess, you&#039;ll need a progressive dictator willing to go after the previous administrations like the Bushes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s true.  </p>
<p>But.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the reality.  Bush and the Republicans have been extremely successful at getting what they want, even when the Dems are in charge.  Think about how far along the progressives would be if they played the game the way the GOP played it.</p>
<p>People will have to admit that that the current form of government and political system in its current state will have to fall before any changes occur.</p>
<p>To clean up the current mess, you&#8217;ll need a progressive dictator willing to go after the previous administrations like the Bushes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10062</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10062</guid>
		<description>Dom,
She would have to be better than W&gt; actually a retarded weasel would have to be better than that jackass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dom,<br />
She would have to be better than W&gt; actually a retarded weasel would have to be better than that jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10061</link>
		<dc:creator>DomPierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10061</guid>
		<description>People seem to forget the last time she &quot;endorsed&quot; someone by having them on her show, we ended up with the current resident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to forget the last time she &#8220;endorsed&#8221; someone by having them on her show, we ended up with the current resident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rho</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-10060</link>
		<dc:creator>Rho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2007/12/15/oprah-the-un-hillary/#comment-10060</guid>
		<description>Actually I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing her on Obama&#039;s ticket as his running mate. Can you imagine Obama/Oprah 08?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing her on Obama&#8217;s ticket as his running mate. Can you imagine Obama/Oprah 08?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

