<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why, oh why, did you sell out, Matt Taibbi?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: garbagemann1234</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-53287</link>
		<dc:creator>garbagemann1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-53287</guid>
		<description>yeah, it&#039;s OK to insult the Pope...but to go against the writers??? OH NO!!!

you are in the dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, it&#8217;s OK to insult the Pope&#8230;but to go against the writers??? OH NO!!!</p>
<p>you are in the dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doraemi</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-12038</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doraemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-12038</guid>
		<description>Regarding IMF/WB:

&quot;Sounds to me as thought hey have fulfilled their purposes and I say we should all be thankful, our comfortable standard of living is a direct result of the worldâ€™s economy not repeatedly crashing.&quot;

Are you kidding?  This is the view of a nation that benefits from the debt slavery of the rest of the world.   Their wealth flows into our economy and inflates our standard of living.  This is the post WW2 plan for economic domination of the world, which was spelled out and implemented deliberately.

&quot;All that we had borrowed up to 1985 was around $5 billion, and we have paid about $16 billion; yet we are still being told that we owe about $28 billion. That $28 billion came about because of the injustice in the foreign creditors&#039; interest rates. If you ask me what is the worst thing in the world, I will say it is compound interest. &quot; --President Obasanjo of Nigeria

Why is Iran Still in the Cross-Hairs?
Clues from the Project of a New American Century
by Dr. Ellen Hodgson Brown
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;aid=7783

I guess if rape and pillage makes you feel comfortable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding IMF/WB:</p>
<p>&#8220;Sounds to me as thought hey have fulfilled their purposes and I say we should all be thankful, our comfortable standard of living is a direct result of the worldâ€™s economy not repeatedly crashing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you kidding?  This is the view of a nation that benefits from the debt slavery of the rest of the world.   Their wealth flows into our economy and inflates our standard of living.  This is the post WW2 plan for economic domination of the world, which was spelled out and implemented deliberately.</p>
<p>&#8220;All that we had borrowed up to 1985 was around $5 billion, and we have paid about $16 billion; yet we are still being told that we owe about $28 billion. That $28 billion came about because of the injustice in the foreign creditors&#8217; interest rates. If you ask me what is the worst thing in the world, I will say it is compound interest. &#8221; &#8211;President Obasanjo of Nigeria</p>
<p>Why is Iran Still in the Cross-Hairs?<br />
Clues from the Project of a New American Century<br />
by Dr. Ellen Hodgson Brown<br />
<a href="http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&#038;aid=7783" rel="nofollow">http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&#038;aid=7783</a></p>
<p>I guess if rape and pillage makes you feel comfortable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whythawk</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11955</link>
		<dc:creator>whythawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11955</guid>
		<description>In economics it&#039;s called &quot;first mover advantage&quot; - he gets some premium airtime amongst people starved for entertainment and he builds his brand.  Even better, by crossing a picket line he proves his contrarian independence.  Good marketing for him.  Only matters if the only people paying for his work are other writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In economics it&#8217;s called &#8220;first mover advantage&#8221; &#8211; he gets some premium airtime amongst people starved for entertainment and he builds his brand.  Even better, by crossing a picket line he proves his contrarian independence.  Good marketing for him.  Only matters if the only people paying for his work are other writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heathenish</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11942</link>
		<dc:creator>heathenish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11942</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. Taibbi didn&#039;t do any writing for either show, so how is he a scab? Are all of the various crew--cameramen, lighting people, control room, etc., who are obviously working on these shows, scabs too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. Taibbi didn&#8217;t do any writing for either show, so how is he a scab? Are all of the various crew&#8211;cameramen, lighting people, control room, etc., who are obviously working on these shows, scabs too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave from queens</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11897</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave from queens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11897</guid>
		<description>I think Matt Taibbi is a decent guy who has done some extraordinary reporting.

I think he appears to be wrong in this instance based on his position as a writer for a magazine.

However, I also think we should all take a chill pill.  Let&#039;s not crucify someone for one mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Matt Taibbi is a decent guy who has done some extraordinary reporting.</p>
<p>I think he appears to be wrong in this instance based on his position as a writer for a magazine.</p>
<p>However, I also think we should all take a chill pill.  Let&#8217;s not crucify someone for one mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhal</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11870</link>
		<dc:creator>bhal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11870</guid>
		<description>My comment was going to be precisely the same as Greg @ #28.  He just kept laughing like a little schoolgirl at Colbert&#039;s (relatively weak) material.  It was like watching Robin Quivers and Howard Stern. I had to shut it off before the &#039;interview&#039; ended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment was going to be precisely the same as Greg @ #28.  He just kept laughing like a little schoolgirl at Colbert&#8217;s (relatively weak) material.  It was like watching Robin Quivers and Howard Stern. I had to shut it off before the &#8216;interview&#8217; ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disturbing news about Matt Taibbi &#124; Five Before Chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11867</link>
		<dc:creator>Disturbing news about Matt Taibbi &#124; Five Before Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11867</guid>
		<description>[...] Some of you who follow politics are probably familiar with journalist Matt Taibbi, whose gonzo journalism I admire quite a bit. I&#8217;ve written before about his takedowns of 9-11 conspiracy theorists and John McCain. Now, although I&#8217;m not following the WGA strike as much as others do, I&#8217;m a pretty strong supporter of the labor movement. So, naturally, I was a bit bugged by the news that Taibbi&#8217;s crossed the picket line to appear on the Colbert Report. From Scholars and Rogues: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some of you who follow politics are probably familiar with journalist Matt Taibbi, whose gonzo journalism I admire quite a bit. I&#8217;ve written before about his takedowns of 9-11 conspiracy theorists and John McCain. Now, although I&#8217;m not following the WGA strike as much as others do, I&#8217;m a pretty strong supporter of the labor movement. So, naturally, I was a bit bugged by the news that Taibbi&#8217;s crossed the picket line to appear on the Colbert Report. From Scholars and Rogues: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11863</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11863</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know Matt Taibbi&#039;s work, except for an occasional blog post that links to him, so I cannot offer an opinion on how funny or smart he really is.  However, I saw his interview with Colbert and thought he contributed nothing to the show.  If anything, I thought he provided nothing more than color commentary to Colbert&#039;s schtick.  Maybe if there were writers, Colbert and Taibbi would have had something of substance prepared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Matt Taibbi&#8217;s work, except for an occasional blog post that links to him, so I cannot offer an opinion on how funny or smart he really is.  However, I saw his interview with Colbert and thought he contributed nothing to the show.  If anything, I thought he provided nothing more than color commentary to Colbert&#8217;s schtick.  Maybe if there were writers, Colbert and Taibbi would have had something of substance prepared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11861</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11861</guid>
		<description>Separating the entertainment writers from the union issue, here&#039;s what my friend Chris Ketcham had to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterpunch.org/ketcham11272007.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;say&lt;/a&gt;. He writes on mostly environmental issues for top magazines (Men&#039;s Journal, National Geographic):
&lt;blockquote&gt;Dear Entertainment Writers on Strike: Recently returned to so-called civilization from the canyons of Utah, I had the opportunity, after long hiatus, to enjoy the product of some of your writing as it gets shoveled into the American maw via television (no TV in my house). What a feat, this writing. It evidenced so much that was stale, false, crass, violent, foolish, salacious, gimmicky, irrelevant, sycophantic, complacent, compliant --it was, in short, the perfect distraction in a dying republic fast on its way to tyranny, the gift that keeps on giving to a government that would hope to turn the screw on free-thinking citizens. In other words, writers--&lt;em&gt;you keep on striking!&lt;/em&gt;

Behold: The entertainment will grow cold and grey as the corpse that it already is, with no new cadavers to puppeteer for the newness of each season, where nothing is as new as the recycled dead from the last season. Like Plato&#039;s chained slaves in the cave of shadows, let the viewers wake up, walk into the light, starved for reality--oh writers, let no new entertainments issue from your minds! &lt;strong&gt;You may just save the Republic.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separating the entertainment writers from the union issue, here&#8217;s what my friend Chris Ketcham had to <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/ketcham11272007.html" rel="nofollow">say</a>. He writes on mostly environmental issues for top magazines (Men&#8217;s Journal, National Geographic):</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Entertainment Writers on Strike: Recently returned to so-called civilization from the canyons of Utah, I had the opportunity, after long hiatus, to enjoy the product of some of your writing as it gets shoveled into the American maw via television (no TV in my house). What a feat, this writing. It evidenced so much that was stale, false, crass, violent, foolish, salacious, gimmicky, irrelevant, sycophantic, complacent, compliant &#8211;it was, in short, the perfect distraction in a dying republic fast on its way to tyranny, the gift that keeps on giving to a government that would hope to turn the screw on free-thinking citizens. In other words, writers&#8211;<em>you keep on striking!</em></p>
<p>Behold: The entertainment will grow cold and grey as the corpse that it already is, with no new cadavers to puppeteer for the newness of each season, where nothing is as new as the recycled dead from the last season. Like Plato&#8217;s chained slaves in the cave of shadows, let the viewers wake up, walk into the light, starved for reality&#8211;oh writers, let no new entertainments issue from your minds! <strong>You may just save the Republic.</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suburban Guerrilla &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Real Time</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11858</link>
		<dc:creator>Suburban Guerrilla &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Real Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11858</guid>
		<description>[...] And by the way, why did Taibbi cross the picket line? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And by the way, why did Taibbi cross the picket line? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doc</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11839</link>
		<dc:creator>doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11839</guid>
		<description>corporations are groupd of individuals who have banded together for economic gain with lower personal risk. I fail to understand how anyone, except corporate pawns, would even suggest that workers shouldn&#039;t band together to bargain with corporations. It seems inherently fair to do so...and the most reasonable way for workers to reduce exploitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>corporations are groupd of individuals who have banded together for economic gain with lower personal risk. I fail to understand how anyone, except corporate pawns, would even suggest that workers shouldn&#8217;t band together to bargain with corporations. It seems inherently fair to do so&#8230;and the most reasonable way for workers to reduce exploitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rho</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11835</link>
		<dc:creator>Rho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11835</guid>
		<description>World Bank and IMF are the root of all evil? Lets look at what those 2 organizations were designed to do and decide if they fulfill their stated purposes. After WW1 the country fell into the great depression and the entire world joined in. As WW2 was drawing to a close the leading economists in the world got the countries with the leading economies in the world to agree to the creation of the IMF and the World bank to insure another global great depression did not occur. Well let&#039;s see, since they were created many countries have experienced depressions and economic slowdowns but none of them succeeded in dragging the entire global community along with them. Not even when the second largest super power at the time the USSR imploded did the whole world economy crash. Sounds to me as thought hey have fulfilled their purposes and I say we should all be thankful, our comfortable standard of living is a direct result of the world&#039;s economy not repeatedly crashing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>World Bank and IMF are the root of all evil? Lets look at what those 2 organizations were designed to do and decide if they fulfill their stated purposes. After WW1 the country fell into the great depression and the entire world joined in. As WW2 was drawing to a close the leading economists in the world got the countries with the leading economies in the world to agree to the creation of the IMF and the World bank to insure another global great depression did not occur. Well let&#8217;s see, since they were created many countries have experienced depressions and economic slowdowns but none of them succeeded in dragging the entire global community along with them. Not even when the second largest super power at the time the USSR imploded did the whole world economy crash. Sounds to me as thought hey have fulfilled their purposes and I say we should all be thankful, our comfortable standard of living is a direct result of the world&#8217;s economy not repeatedly crashing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoOneYouKnow</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11823</link>
		<dc:creator>NoOneYouKnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11823</guid>
		<description>BTW, I used to read Taibbi a fair amount in the NY Press. I took him to be sometimes good, i.e. insightful and clever. The rest of the time he seemed to me to be kind of a loose cannon -- not funny, not accurate, and simply obnoxious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I used to read Taibbi a fair amount in the NY Press. I took him to be sometimes good, i.e. insightful and clever. The rest of the time he seemed to me to be kind of a loose cannon &#8212; not funny, not accurate, and simply obnoxious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11821</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11821</guid>
		<description>The global economy is a failed model?  As it&#039;s currently incarnated, it has major problems, that&#039;s true.  But ultimately our economic success is fundamentally dependent on the rest of the world.  It&#039;s simply not possible, without taking a massive step backward along the technological road we&#039;ve been traveling since at least the industrial revolution, to be self-sufficient in the way that you&#039;re suggesting.  The fact of the matter is that we need trade with the rest of the world for raw materials if nothing else, and economies of scale mean that it really does make sense to manufacture (or grow) certain things certain places.  When waste products (like CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) are included, the economies will shift some, but the fundamental economic laws won&#039;t change until we can eliminate the economy a la the utopian Star Trek model.

You have a point about the difference between the union leadership and the union members, but it&#039;s a small point.  Union members are the ones allowing themselves to be duped into voting for sleazebags to lead them, and they&#039;re the ones letting themselves be manipulated into voting for bad contracts by corrupt leaders.  Even the good union leaders (and I suspect there are a lot of them) are stuck with crummy executive leadership or an &quot;I want mine, screw everyone else&quot; mentality in too many of their members.  I&#039;ve directly observed that mentality lead to short-sighted decisions by at least one union.

I actually agree that unions are a great idea - they&#039;ve done a ton to give workers the protection they have - but the global economy (or some form of it) is here to stay for a long, long time and unions will have to adapt.  Thus far the majority of them seem unwilling or unable to do so.

Unions would probably serve their members &lt;em&gt;long term&lt;/em&gt; interests best by pushing for more investment in foreign economies, collective bargaining laws in other nations, human rights and freedoms around the world, and general push toward democracy and the rule of law than by lobbying for protectionism here in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The global economy is a failed model?  As it&#8217;s currently incarnated, it has major problems, that&#8217;s true.  But ultimately our economic success is fundamentally dependent on the rest of the world.  It&#8217;s simply not possible, without taking a massive step backward along the technological road we&#8217;ve been traveling since at least the industrial revolution, to be self-sufficient in the way that you&#8217;re suggesting.  The fact of the matter is that we need trade with the rest of the world for raw materials if nothing else, and economies of scale mean that it really does make sense to manufacture (or grow) certain things certain places.  When waste products (like CO<sub>2</sub>) are included, the economies will shift some, but the fundamental economic laws won&#8217;t change until we can eliminate the economy a la the utopian Star Trek model.</p>
<p>You have a point about the difference between the union leadership and the union members, but it&#8217;s a small point.  Union members are the ones allowing themselves to be duped into voting for sleazebags to lead them, and they&#8217;re the ones letting themselves be manipulated into voting for bad contracts by corrupt leaders.  Even the good union leaders (and I suspect there are a lot of them) are stuck with crummy executive leadership or an &#8220;I want mine, screw everyone else&#8221; mentality in too many of their members.  I&#8217;ve directly observed that mentality lead to short-sighted decisions by at least one union.</p>
<p>I actually agree that unions are a great idea &#8211; they&#8217;ve done a ton to give workers the protection they have &#8211; but the global economy (or some form of it) is here to stay for a long, long time and unions will have to adapt.  Thus far the majority of them seem unwilling or unable to do so.</p>
<p>Unions would probably serve their members <em>long term</em> interests best by pushing for more investment in foreign economies, collective bargaining laws in other nations, human rights and freedoms around the world, and general push toward democracy and the rule of law than by lobbying for protectionism here in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john doraemi</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11819</link>
		<dc:creator>john doraemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11819</guid>
		<description>Taibbi deserved to be flushed when he jumped on the attacking 9/11 straw men bandwagon.   Rather than investigating what is perhaps the most glaring cover up in US history, where not even the chairs of the commission believe they are telling us the whole story, Taibbi went on the rampage with trying to discredit 9/11 skeptics, period.  The man lost all credibility, and showed his true colors along with several other prominent lefty &quot;alternative&quot; types.

Senator Bob Graham tells us of &quot;foreign governments&quot; assisting the alleged hijackers, and the nation goes back to sleep?  Senator Max Cleland tells us of a disgusting cover up and &quot;national disgrace,&quot; and nothing happens.  Revelation after revelation of possible high treason is brought forth, and nothing is done, no one is accountable.  It appears to be sanctioned by both criminal political parties.

FBI special agent Robert Wright uses the word &quot;treason.&quot;  

FBI translator Sibel Edmonds describes treason and a host of other crimes leading right back to the white house.  She&#039;s gagged, more than anyone in the nation&#039;s history, but is starting to spill the beans now.

And a lot of smug, ignorant stuffed shirts refuse to investigate, or even acknowledge the cover up as the elephant in the room, while we do not know, still to this day what happened on 9/11.  The investigations were frauds, cover ups, fictions from government payroll operatives and supposed terrorists subject to infinite torture who were also reported dead before they became the authors of our modern fiction (KSM).  These black holed sources have never been shown, or proven to be alive at all.

And they get away with it in broad daylight.

70 disturbing facts about 9-11
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-george-monbiot-these-are-facts-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taibbi deserved to be flushed when he jumped on the attacking 9/11 straw men bandwagon.   Rather than investigating what is perhaps the most glaring cover up in US history, where not even the chairs of the commission believe they are telling us the whole story, Taibbi went on the rampage with trying to discredit 9/11 skeptics, period.  The man lost all credibility, and showed his true colors along with several other prominent lefty &#8220;alternative&#8221; types.</p>
<p>Senator Bob Graham tells us of &#8220;foreign governments&#8221; assisting the alleged hijackers, and the nation goes back to sleep?  Senator Max Cleland tells us of a disgusting cover up and &#8220;national disgrace,&#8221; and nothing happens.  Revelation after revelation of possible high treason is brought forth, and nothing is done, no one is accountable.  It appears to be sanctioned by both criminal political parties.</p>
<p>FBI special agent Robert Wright uses the word &#8220;treason.&#8221;  </p>
<p>FBI translator Sibel Edmonds describes treason and a host of other crimes leading right back to the white house.  She&#8217;s gagged, more than anyone in the nation&#8217;s history, but is starting to spill the beans now.</p>
<p>And a lot of smug, ignorant stuffed shirts refuse to investigate, or even acknowledge the cover up as the elephant in the room, while we do not know, still to this day what happened on 9/11.  The investigations were frauds, cover ups, fictions from government payroll operatives and supposed terrorists subject to infinite torture who were also reported dead before they became the authors of our modern fiction (KSM).  These black holed sources have never been shown, or proven to be alive at all.</p>
<p>And they get away with it in broad daylight.</p>
<p>70 disturbing facts about 9-11<br />
<a href="http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-george-monbiot-these-are-facts-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-george-monbiot-these-are-facts-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feckless</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11816</link>
		<dc:creator>feckless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11816</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really disappointed in Taibbi, I started reading him in 1997 in Moscow and have been a big fan when I rediscovered him in Rolling Stone.

He does appear the hypocrit, I&#039;m sure he would object if someone was selling one of his articles without giving him royalties.

Globally countries like Germany and England, with very strong labor unions, are beating our ass at everything.  But people I know constantly jump to defend overpaid CEO&#039;s and the Walmart heirs over people who earn their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really disappointed in Taibbi, I started reading him in 1997 in Moscow and have been a big fan when I rediscovered him in Rolling Stone.</p>
<p>He does appear the hypocrit, I&#8217;m sure he would object if someone was selling one of his articles without giving him royalties.</p>
<p>Globally countries like Germany and England, with very strong labor unions, are beating our ass at everything.  But people I know constantly jump to defend overpaid CEO&#8217;s and the Walmart heirs over people who earn their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoOneYouKnow</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11814</link>
		<dc:creator>NoOneYouKnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11814</guid>
		<description>What have unions done for you lately? I don&#039;t know, what has penicillin done for you lately? If nothing, should we throw it out? Unions are the only way for workers to overcome the huge advantages most employers have over them. If someone else signs your paycheck (and you&#039;re not some managerial weasel), you&#039;re a sucker if you don&#039;t support unions, at least in theory.
Also, it&#039;s naive to say that the solution to poor union management and globalization is more oversight; the corporations have stacked the deck against ordinary Americans. Bushco&#039;s Labor Dept., and Bushco in general, are utterly hostile to workers, and decades of anti-union propaganda have led millions of Americans to become hostile to their own best interests. Actually, one of the best ways to invigorate unions, and by extention American politics, is by joining a union.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What have unions done for you lately? I don&#8217;t know, what has penicillin done for you lately? If nothing, should we throw it out? Unions are the only way for workers to overcome the huge advantages most employers have over them. If someone else signs your paycheck (and you&#8217;re not some managerial weasel), you&#8217;re a sucker if you don&#8217;t support unions, at least in theory.<br />
Also, it&#8217;s naive to say that the solution to poor union management and globalization is more oversight; the corporations have stacked the deck against ordinary Americans. Bushco&#8217;s Labor Dept., and Bushco in general, are utterly hostile to workers, and decades of anti-union propaganda have led millions of Americans to become hostile to their own best interests. Actually, one of the best ways to invigorate unions, and by extention American politics, is by joining a union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savantster</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11811</link>
		<dc:creator>Savantster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11811</guid>
		<description>&quot;and given our global economy, how do we compete as a nation when union contracts dictate payrolls that our competitors simply donâ€™t have?&quot;

That&#039;s the root of the problem right there.. Global Economy.. That&#039;s a failed model, it can&#039;t work, you can&#039;t expect a failed model to fit into successful patterns. 

I&#039;m sure you understand the position on this matter from Kucinich and Paul, correct? KILL the &quot;global agreements&quot; we have, become SELF sufficient.. That wasn&#039;t a problem for a LONG time, then the Mega Corps successfully lied to the masses and told them &quot;you can get more STUFF FOREVER if you let us do this!&quot;..

The powers behind it are the World Bank and IMF..they are making a HUGE killing on this, and represent the &quot;central bank&quot; of the central banking world. It survives by exploiting everyone it can, and we have to tell them &quot;not in my back yard&quot;.. but, they own our leaders, so that&#039;s not going to happen any time soon.

With regard to Unions.. it&#039;s not &quot;unions&quot; that are &quot;bad&quot;, it&#039;s their leadership. The wrong people get into the job for the wrong reasons, and the Corporations buy them off. Corruption is preached from the TOP, and rewarded.. so it flows down hill and spreads it&#039;s rot into the lowest of the cracks.

What fixes it is MORE oversight.. that means MORE individual involvement by citizens. But, we&#039;re all glued to that TV (by those writers, no less.. catch-22 there!) and suck up the &quot;gimme gimme gimme! MORE MORE MORE!&quot; mentality that&#039;s being pushed by the Mega Corps. You DO realize they spend BILLIONS every year on psychologists and &quot;experts&quot; and &quot;research&quot; (like going into public schools and taking our kids out of classes to find out what THEY think would make them want to buy MORE stuff). We&#039;re literally being abused by &quot;professionals&quot;, all for the same end.. GREED.

Until the MASSES -demand- that -all- violators of law, including those hiding behind their &quot;job&quot; and paper, are prosecuted, and we SEE that there truly IS -zero- tolerance and crime does NOT pay, we&#039;ll have these problems. Corrupt leaders are allowed to keep getting rich even after they abuse the public. Why should they stop? And why shouldn&#039;t it permeate -everything-?

Don&#039;t blame the victim in all of this. Unions are an idea, and the idea is &quot;good&quot;.. it&#039;s implementation by bad people is the problem, not the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and given our global economy, how do we compete as a nation when union contracts dictate payrolls that our competitors simply donâ€™t have?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the root of the problem right there.. Global Economy.. That&#8217;s a failed model, it can&#8217;t work, you can&#8217;t expect a failed model to fit into successful patterns. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you understand the position on this matter from Kucinich and Paul, correct? KILL the &#8220;global agreements&#8221; we have, become SELF sufficient.. That wasn&#8217;t a problem for a LONG time, then the Mega Corps successfully lied to the masses and told them &#8220;you can get more STUFF FOREVER if you let us do this!&#8221;..</p>
<p>The powers behind it are the World Bank and IMF..they are making a HUGE killing on this, and represent the &#8220;central bank&#8221; of the central banking world. It survives by exploiting everyone it can, and we have to tell them &#8220;not in my back yard&#8221;.. but, they own our leaders, so that&#8217;s not going to happen any time soon.</p>
<p>With regard to Unions.. it&#8217;s not &#8220;unions&#8221; that are &#8220;bad&#8221;, it&#8217;s their leadership. The wrong people get into the job for the wrong reasons, and the Corporations buy them off. Corruption is preached from the TOP, and rewarded.. so it flows down hill and spreads it&#8217;s rot into the lowest of the cracks.</p>
<p>What fixes it is MORE oversight.. that means MORE individual involvement by citizens. But, we&#8217;re all glued to that TV (by those writers, no less.. catch-22 there!) and suck up the &#8220;gimme gimme gimme! MORE MORE MORE!&#8221; mentality that&#8217;s being pushed by the Mega Corps. You DO realize they spend BILLIONS every year on psychologists and &#8220;experts&#8221; and &#8220;research&#8221; (like going into public schools and taking our kids out of classes to find out what THEY think would make them want to buy MORE stuff). We&#8217;re literally being abused by &#8220;professionals&#8221;, all for the same end.. GREED.</p>
<p>Until the MASSES -demand- that -all- violators of law, including those hiding behind their &#8220;job&#8221; and paper, are prosecuted, and we SEE that there truly IS -zero- tolerance and crime does NOT pay, we&#8217;ll have these problems. Corrupt leaders are allowed to keep getting rich even after they abuse the public. Why should they stop? And why shouldn&#8217;t it permeate -everything-?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t blame the victim in all of this. Unions are an idea, and the idea is &#8220;good&#8221;.. it&#8217;s implementation by bad people is the problem, not the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radio Left</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11800</link>
		<dc:creator>Radio Left</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11800</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lou Dobbs Crosses A Picket Line...&lt;/strong&gt;

DMI Blog

The writers strike is still going on and going strong. Writers are still picketing The Daily Show. 

So why did the self-professed &quot;champion of the middle class&quot; CNN pundit Lou Dobbs go on The Daily Show show last night? That&#039;s scabbing. I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lou Dobbs Crosses A Picket Line&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>DMI Blog</p>
<p>The writers strike is still going on and going strong. Writers are still picketing The Daily Show. </p>
<p>So why did the self-professed &#8220;champion of the middle class&#8221; CNN pundit Lou Dobbs go on The Daily Show show last night? That&#8217;s scabbing. I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/comment-page-1/#comment-11789</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/11/why-oh-why-did-you-sell-out-matt-taibbi/#comment-11789</guid>
		<description>Dave 

I agree, and I&#039;m not sure the entire details of their contracts, and I think writers should get their fair share of dvd/ad sales etc.  However programs like this are a little different.  I can forgive someone for crossing the picket line and going on a &quot;news&quot; show a lot easier.  At least it&#039;s not like the 80&#039;s when Coy and Vance replaced Bo and Luke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave </p>
<p>I agree, and I&#8217;m not sure the entire details of their contracts, and I think writers should get their fair share of dvd/ad sales etc.  However programs like this are a little different.  I can forgive someone for crossing the picket line and going on a &#8220;news&#8221; show a lot easier.  At least it&#8217;s not like the 80&#8242;s when Coy and Vance replaced Bo and Luke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

