<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: 6:54 of clarity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12464</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12464</guid>
		<description>The great American experiment in entrusting our country to someone who doesn&#039;t make us feel inferior with his superior intelligence has failed.

I just about finished reading &quot;Arsenals of Folly&quot; by Richard Rhodes, the nuclear chronicler. The climax of the book is Reagan and Gorbachev&#039;s summit at Reykjavik.

We think Reagan wasn&#039;t, to be charitable, a details guy. But he studied hard, referred to his notes, and engaged Gorbachev in dialogue for days on end. (Of course, it didn&#039;t end so happily, no thanks to Reagan. But that&#039;s another story.)

Bush couldn&#039;t have even gotten to square one in that chess game. But at least he&#039;s helped us understand the importance of electing a president with brains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great American experiment in entrusting our country to someone who doesn&#8217;t make us feel inferior with his superior intelligence has failed.</p>
<p>I just about finished reading &#8220;Arsenals of Folly&#8221; by Richard Rhodes, the nuclear chronicler. The climax of the book is Reagan and Gorbachev&#8217;s summit at Reykjavik.</p>
<p>We think Reagan wasn&#8217;t, to be charitable, a details guy. But he studied hard, referred to his notes, and engaged Gorbachev in dialogue for days on end. (Of course, it didn&#8217;t end so happily, no thanks to Reagan. But that&#8217;s another story.)</p>
<p>Bush couldn&#8217;t have even gotten to square one in that chess game. But at least he&#8217;s helped us understand the importance of electing a president with brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djerrid</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12448</link>
		<dc:creator>Djerrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12448</guid>
		<description>To hell with charisma.  The sheer power of someone&#039;s personality is a somewhat undervalued and derided factor in choosing a leader, but no one should base their vote on charm. The clarity and coherence of delivering an argument is a much more important trait in a presidential contender. Doing so in a way that incorperates opposing viewpoints instead of dismissing or deriding them while still holding firm to one&#039;s core beliefs is a rare and commendable talent. 

Case in point: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579,00.html
That&#039;s a chapter from Obama&#039;s &quot;Audacity&quot; book chiseling the wall between church and state.  And while I don&#039;t share his views on religion or how it intersects with politics, I have a real appreciation for the way he carved his path to his conclusion. This transparency in his decision-making process and his non-ideological approach speaks volumes about his ability to create consensus needed so that we can take the large steps needed to fix this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To hell with charisma.  The sheer power of someone&#8217;s personality is a somewhat undervalued and derided factor in choosing a leader, but no one should base their vote on charm. The clarity and coherence of delivering an argument is a much more important trait in a presidential contender. Doing so in a way that incorperates opposing viewpoints instead of dismissing or deriding them while still holding firm to one&#8217;s core beliefs is a rare and commendable talent. </p>
<p>Case in point: <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579,00.html</a><br />
That&#8217;s a chapter from Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Audacity&#8221; book chiseling the wall between church and state.  And while I don&#8217;t share his views on religion or how it intersects with politics, I have a real appreciation for the way he carved his path to his conclusion. This transparency in his decision-making process and his non-ideological approach speaks volumes about his ability to create consensus needed so that we can take the large steps needed to fix this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Scrogues&#160;:&#160;freedompictures</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12446</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Scrogues&#160;:&#160;freedompictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12446</guid>
		<description>[...] In the past couple of days, inter alia: Euphrosyne pokes a pointy stick in the beady eye of Chris Matthews, Dr. Slammy finds a recording of Alfred Tennyson reciting The Charge of the Light Brigade and muses further on the eloquence of Barack Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the past couple of days, inter alia: Euphrosyne pokes a pointy stick in the beady eye of Chris Matthews, Dr. Slammy finds a recording of Alfred Tennyson reciting The Charge of the Light Brigade and muses further on the eloquence of Barack Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12435</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12435</guid>
		<description>What does it say about how low we&#039;ve set the bar that someone of Obama&#039;s elocution and verbal skill is now exceptional? There was a time when ALL of our great leaders could command an audience and spin a narrative. 

We get the leaders we deserve, and those that are suitable for our times. Perhaps Bush is emblematic of our debased, ahistoric, and coarsened culture, and Obama is a signifier of what we can return to.

One can hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it say about how low we&#8217;ve set the bar that someone of Obama&#8217;s elocution and verbal skill is now exceptional? There was a time when ALL of our great leaders could command an audience and spin a narrative. </p>
<p>We get the leaders we deserve, and those that are suitable for our times. Perhaps Bush is emblematic of our debased, ahistoric, and coarsened culture, and Obama is a signifier of what we can return to.</p>
<p>One can hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support this story on Stirrdup</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12399</link>
		<dc:creator>Support this story on Stirrdup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12399</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama: 6:54 of clarity...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama: 6:54 of clarity&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12395</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12395</guid>
		<description>Hell, me loaded on Everclear and Coke would make more sense than Boosh.  Which makes me wonder what *he&#039;s* been drinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, me loaded on Everclear and Coke would make more sense than Boosh.  Which makes me wonder what *he&#8217;s* been drinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12374</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12374</guid>
		<description>I am immune to raw charisma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am immune to raw charisma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/comment-page-1/#comment-12373</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/17/obama-654-of-clarity/#comment-12373</guid>
		<description>Come to us, Sam... come to the Obamarama...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come to us, Sam&#8230; come to the Obamarama&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

