<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet freedom means net neutrality, not &#8220;pay-as-you-go&#8221; broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:43:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymously Given</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-67327</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymously Given</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/#comment-67327</guid>
		<description>The spam problem is a simple one to solve.  The majority of my spam mail messages originate, or are tunneled through, machines that hide behind the Great Wall of China.  

The Chinese censors see great harm in words like &quot;Democracy&quot;, &quot;Tiamen Square&quot;, and &quot;Sex&quot;, and such words are vaporized as they cross Chinese routers, but email spam with brashly emboldened fake URLs proclaiming origination from &quot;PhishingLureFly.com&quot; go blasting across their censor system routers faster than the fly on the rod with triple leads.

Obviously, the Chinese government is facilitating the massive spam assault upon us.  They could stop it easily if they wanted to, and they have all of the tools in place to do so (not that I advocate such tools for draconian government intrusion into communications).   I am not indicating that I endorse censorship.  In this country (U.S.), due process is &quot;officially&quot; the only condoned method to stop spammers (thank God),  and I would hope that such were the case in China too, except that (of course) it isn&#039;t.

But, they could use the equivalent of their due process (that isn&#039;t), to stop the spam.  

In other words, the solution to spam lies with the embassy workers and the embassy officials representing each of the world&#039;s countries inside of China.  Perhaps the U.N. could be involved, but in any case it&#039;s a diplomatic problem, not a technical one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spam problem is a simple one to solve.  The majority of my spam mail messages originate, or are tunneled through, machines that hide behind the Great Wall of China.  </p>
<p>The Chinese censors see great harm in words like &#8220;Democracy&#8221;, &#8220;Tiamen Square&#8221;, and &#8220;Sex&#8221;, and such words are vaporized as they cross Chinese routers, but email spam with brashly emboldened fake URLs proclaiming origination from &#8220;PhishingLureFly.com&#8221; go blasting across their censor system routers faster than the fly on the rod with triple leads.</p>
<p>Obviously, the Chinese government is facilitating the massive spam assault upon us.  They could stop it easily if they wanted to, and they have all of the tools in place to do so (not that I advocate such tools for draconian government intrusion into communications).   I am not indicating that I endorse censorship.  In this country (U.S.), due process is &#8220;officially&#8221; the only condoned method to stop spammers (thank God),  and I would hope that such were the case in China too, except that (of course) it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But, they could use the equivalent of their due process (that isn&#8217;t), to stop the spam.  </p>
<p>In other words, the solution to spam lies with the embassy workers and the embassy officials representing each of the world&#8217;s countries inside of China.  Perhaps the U.N. could be involved, but in any case it&#8217;s a diplomatic problem, not a technical one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boztopia.com &#124; Metered broadband won&#8217;t bridge the digital divide</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-41562</link>
		<dc:creator>Boztopia.com &#124; Metered broadband won&#8217;t bridge the digital divide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/#comment-41562</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote back in January when news of the experiment broke, there is a massive gap in access between those who regularly use the Internet, and those who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote back in January when news of the experiment broke, there is a massive gap in access between those who regularly use the Internet, and those who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-12728</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/01/21/internet-freedom-means-net-neutrality-not-pay-as-you-go-broadband/#comment-12728</guid>
		<description>I like the broad principles that you outline, Martin, but you (and Meinrath) don&#039;t appear to address means to squelching the massively disruptive and expensive spam problem.

When spam accounts for something 97% of all emails, freeing up all that bandwidth and the associated hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars spent globally to keep you and I and 1.2 billion of our closest friends from reading spam would free up money that could easily be used to fix buildout problems, fund international interoperability standards organizations, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the broad principles that you outline, Martin, but you (and Meinrath) don&#8217;t appear to address means to squelching the massively disruptive and expensive spam problem.</p>
<p>When spam accounts for something 97% of all emails, freeing up all that bandwidth and the associated hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars spent globally to keep you and I and 1.2 billion of our closest friends from reading spam would free up money that could easily be used to fix buildout problems, fund international interoperability standards organizations, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
