<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadow war: AT&amp;T versus Verizon for control of American communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-58100</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/#comment-58100</guid>
		<description>Verizon said they are looking into the issue of my $8,663 cell phone bill.  I had unlimited internet but when I got a new phone I was being charged by the kilobyte.  Should I be concerned with the idea that they maybe digging into my online history ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon said they are looking into the issue of my $8,663 cell phone bill.  I had unlimited internet but when I got a new phone I was being charged by the kilobyte.  Should I be concerned with the idea that they maybe digging into my online history ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Don&#8217;t let the future be compressed&#8211;fight for a free Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-35770</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Don&#8217;t let the future be compressed&#8211;fight for a free Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/#comment-35770</guid>
		<description>[...] in the middle of a shadow war over control of the Internet, and the people who matter the most&#8211;you and I&#8211;need to make our voices heard over the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the middle of a shadow war over control of the Internet, and the people who matter the most&#8211;you and I&#8211;need to make our voices heard over the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-14910</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/#comment-14910</guid>
		<description>Damn....  I had no idea that anyone was deploying FTTH yet, at least outside of major apartment buildings in downtown cores.  The buildout costs have got to be huge.  I&#039;m impressed, and a little jealous too.

You&#039;re almost certainly right, Martin.  The FiOS service hast to be a huge reason for the difference between AT&amp;T&#039;s and Verizon&#039;s responses to this issue - they&#039;ve got people lined up for their service precisely because it&#039;s a big pipe - having to tell their customers that they&#039;ll be monitoring the pipe for Torrent feeds, P2P networks, etc. would probably make FiOS stillborn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn&#8230;.  I had no idea that anyone was deploying FTTH yet, at least outside of major apartment buildings in downtown cores.  The buildout costs have got to be huge.  I&#8217;m impressed, and a little jealous too.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re almost certainly right, Martin.  The FiOS service hast to be a huge reason for the difference between AT&#038;T&#8217;s and Verizon&#8217;s responses to this issue &#8211; they&#8217;ve got people lined up for their service precisely because it&#8217;s a big pipe &#8211; having to tell their customers that they&#8217;ll be monitoring the pipe for Torrent feeds, P2P networks, etc. would probably make FiOS stillborn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/comment-page-1/#comment-14908</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/02/07/shadow-war-att-versus-verizon-for-control-of-american-communications/#comment-14908</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Shadow war: AT&amp;T versus Verizon for control of American communications...&lt;/strong&gt;

Verizon is saying it won&#039;t police Internet content out of concern for customer privacy, even as its competitor AT&amp;T plans to do so. Given that this company spied illegally on millions of Americans, what&#039;s behind the change of heart?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Shadow war: AT&amp;T versus Verizon for control of American communications&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Verizon is saying it won&#8217;t police Internet content out of concern for customer privacy, even as its competitor AT&amp;T plans to do so. Given that this company spied illegally on millions of Americans, what&#8217;s behind the change of heart?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

