<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God-talk in the presidential election (or why evangelicals are voting for Barack)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-24677</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/#comment-24677</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dr. Clark. We&#039;ve got the scorecard. Now we know who the players are.

Re. . .
&lt;blockquote&gt;Over the years, folks in the older, mainline tradition parts of Calvinism and Reform have tended to shy away from the fervor of evangelicalism. This is where Hillaryâ€™s tradition would fit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Her tradition might, but she does&#039;t. See excerpt below from a Mother Jones &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; that, in part, chronicles her religious wanderings.
&lt;blockquote&gt;When Clinton first came to Washington in 1993, one of her first steps was to join a Bible study group. For the next eight years, she regularly met with a Christian &quot;cell&quot; whose members included Susan Baker, wife of Bush consigliere James Baker; Joanne Kemp, wife of conservative icon Jack Kemp; Eileen Bakke, wife of Dennis Bakke, a leader in the anti-union Christian management movement; and Grace Nelson, the wife of Senator Bill Nelson, a conservative Florida Democrat.

Clinton&#039;s prayer group was part of the Fellowship (or &quot;the Family&quot;), a network of sex-segregated cells of political, business, and military leaders dedicated to &quot;spiritual war&quot; on behalf of Christ, many of them recruited at the Fellowship&#039;s only public event, the annual National Prayer Breakfast. (Aside from the breakfast, the group has &quot;made a fetish of being invisible,&quot; former Republican Senator William Armstrong has said.) The Fellowship believes that the elite win power by the will of God, who uses them for his purposes. Its mission is to help the powerful understand their role in God&#039;s plan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dr. Clark. We&#8217;ve got the scorecard. Now we know who the players are.</p>
<p>Re. . .</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the years, folks in the older, mainline tradition parts of Calvinism and Reform have tended to shy away from the fervor of evangelicalism. This is where Hillaryâ€™s tradition would fit.</p></blockquote>
<p>Her tradition might, but she does&#8217;t. See excerpt below from a Mother Jones <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html" rel="nofollow">article</a> that, in part, chronicles her religious wanderings.</p>
<blockquote><p>When Clinton first came to Washington in 1993, one of her first steps was to join a Bible study group. For the next eight years, she regularly met with a Christian &#8220;cell&#8221; whose members included Susan Baker, wife of Bush consigliere James Baker; Joanne Kemp, wife of conservative icon Jack Kemp; Eileen Bakke, wife of Dennis Bakke, a leader in the anti-union Christian management movement; and Grace Nelson, the wife of Senator Bill Nelson, a conservative Florida Democrat.</p>
<p>Clinton&#8217;s prayer group was part of the Fellowship (or &#8220;the Family&#8221;), a network of sex-segregated cells of political, business, and military leaders dedicated to &#8220;spiritual war&#8221; on behalf of Christ, many of them recruited at the Fellowship&#8217;s only public event, the annual National Prayer Breakfast. (Aside from the breakfast, the group has &#8220;made a fetish of being invisible,&#8221; former Republican Senator William Armstrong has said.) The Fellowship believes that the elite win power by the will of God, who uses them for his purposes. Its mission is to help the powerful understand their role in God&#8217;s plan.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-24260</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/#comment-24260</guid>
		<description>Lynn, thanks for taking the time to do this for S&amp;R. As Stewart told me many times, the press does a poor job of covering the basics of religion, let alone its nuances and consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynn, thanks for taking the time to do this for S&#038;R. As Stewart told me many times, the press does a poor job of covering the basics of religion, let alone its nuances and consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/#comment-24220</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis, Lynn. A lot of people out there - and I&#039;m sometimes guilty, as well - usually opt for the nuance-free view that fundie = evangelical. Of course, there&#039;s lots of nuance, and hopefully we can speak a little intelligently from here on out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis, Lynn. A lot of people out there &#8211; and I&#8217;m sometimes guilty, as well &#8211; usually opt for the nuance-free view that fundie = evangelical. Of course, there&#8217;s lots of nuance, and hopefully we can speak a little intelligently from here on out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-24103</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/#comment-24103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;God-talk in the presidential election (or why evangelicals are voting for Barack)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Evangelicals are not fundamentalists; many would resist the idea that they want to impose their worldviews on others. Many are now struggling to figure out how to live in a religiously and culturally plural culture, and Obamaâ€™s message not only reson...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>God-talk in the presidential election (or why evangelicals are voting for Barack)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Evangelicals are not fundamentalists; many would resist the idea that they want to impose their worldviews on others. Many are now struggling to figure out how to live in a religiously and culturally plural culture, and Obamaâ€™s message not only reson&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support this story on Stirrdup</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-24101</link>
		<dc:creator>Support this story on Stirrdup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/03/12/god-talk-in-the-presidential-election-or-why-evangelicals-are-voting-for-barack/#comment-24101</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;God-talk in the presidential election (or why evangelicals are voting for Barack)...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>God-talk in the presidential election (or why evangelicals are voting for Barack)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

