<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The anatomy of a FOX &#8220;interview&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:16:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36957</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36957</guid>
		<description>This hole Country is nothing but Nosense,as far as politic go&#039;s! Its silly or Country is at stake! get real about things.Try and help straten things out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This hole Country is nothing but Nosense,as far as politic go&#8217;s! Its silly or Country is at stake! get real about things.Try and help straten things out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirth</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36921</link>
		<dc:creator>mirth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36921</guid>
		<description>I watched, too. I was not surprised by Wallace&#039;s questions, and Obama no doubt was not. What you call a &quot;gotcha&quot; moment, however, is not nearly as simple as you suggest. Obama could have, for example, suggested that General Petraeus would have to answer some tough questions about the region and about his understanding of CENTCOM&#039;s mission as it pertains to Iran, for example. And Obama could have used that moment to take some steam out of what I think of as a bomb Iran disinformation/propaganda campaign. But no. As I listened to Obama I felt that the &quot;gotcha&quot; didn&#039;t get Obama; it got all of us who look for an honest, truthful discussion of policy options. It would have been quite fair, in other words, for Obama to have turned the tables and put Petraeus, and Wallace, on the spot. In short, I think Wallace&#039;s question was entirely fair and absolutely timely, and I am disappointed by Obama&#039;s quick expression of support for General Petraues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched, too. I was not surprised by Wallace&#8217;s questions, and Obama no doubt was not. What you call a &#8220;gotcha&#8221; moment, however, is not nearly as simple as you suggest. Obama could have, for example, suggested that General Petraeus would have to answer some tough questions about the region and about his understanding of CENTCOM&#8217;s mission as it pertains to Iran, for example. And Obama could have used that moment to take some steam out of what I think of as a bomb Iran disinformation/propaganda campaign. But no. As I listened to Obama I felt that the &#8220;gotcha&#8221; didn&#8217;t get Obama; it got all of us who look for an honest, truthful discussion of policy options. It would have been quite fair, in other words, for Obama to have turned the tables and put Petraeus, and Wallace, on the spot. In short, I think Wallace&#8217;s question was entirely fair and absolutely timely, and I am disappointed by Obama&#8217;s quick expression of support for General Petraues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36920</link>
		<dc:creator>JS O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36920</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll echo the others:  Thanks Josh.  I know this took a lot of time, and I appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll echo the others:  Thanks Josh.  I know this took a lot of time, and I appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36918</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36918</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Josh, for that breakdown. I watched the show when it aired.

The right subverts itself because it resorts to so few talking points. Thus allowing someone like Obama to thoroughly familiarize himself with them.

He was totally prepared and parried everything gracefully.

Please post again at S&amp;R, Josh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Josh, for that breakdown. I watched the show when it aired.</p>
<p>The right subverts itself because it resorts to so few talking points. Thus allowing someone like Obama to thoroughly familiarize himself with them.</p>
<p>He was totally prepared and parried everything gracefully.</p>
<p>Please post again at S&amp;R, Josh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36868</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36868</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome Euphrosyne.  Although, I have to admit, I only watched it once.  It was pretty painful to parse through the transcript though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Euphrosyne.  Although, I have to admit, I only watched it once.  It was pretty painful to parse through the transcript though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36867</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36867</guid>
		<description>Pathetic. Thank you for watching it enough times to tabulate the questions... the discourse is depressing, but clear-headed analysis is always heartening. Loved it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pathetic. Thank you for watching it enough times to tabulate the questions&#8230; the discourse is depressing, but clear-headed analysis is always heartening. Loved it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36866</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36866</guid>
		<description>Certainly, that is spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly, that is spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36865</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36865</guid>
		<description>I would be disappointed that he&#039;s shying away, except for one thing. Unless something really unprecedented goes wrong for Obama, he has the nomination more or less sewed up. At this point I&#039;m not sure he stands to gain anything from debating her again.

However, I&#039;d love that kind of format for some eventual Obama/McDubya tangles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be disappointed that he&#8217;s shying away, except for one thing. Unless something really unprecedented goes wrong for Obama, he has the nomination more or less sewed up. At this point I&#8217;m not sure he stands to gain anything from debating her again.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;d love that kind of format for some eventual Obama/McDubya tangles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36864</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36864</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Denny, it really is getting old.

I like the idea of the Lincoln-Douglas style debates Clinton recently proposed.  Although I&#039;m an Obama supporter, I&#039;m pretty disappointed that he is shying away from the idea.  

Unfortunately, until the infrastructure of alternative media is built up sufficiently, candidates will have to continue to rely on mass media for getting their messages out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Denny, it really is getting old.</p>
<p>I like the idea of the Lincoln-Douglas style debates Clinton recently proposed.  Although I&#8217;m an Obama supporter, I&#8217;m pretty disappointed that he is shying away from the idea.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, until the infrastructure of alternative media is built up sufficiently, candidates will have to continue to rely on mass media for getting their messages out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36863</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36863</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The anatomy of a FOX â€œinterviewâ€...&lt;/strong&gt;

A detailed, minute-by-minute analysis of Chris Wallace&#039;s attempts to kneecap Barack Obama in yesterday&#039;s &quot;interview.&quot; If this is journalism, maybe we&#039;d all be better off without it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The anatomy of a FOX â€œinterviewâ€&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A detailed, minute-by-minute analysis of Chris Wallace&#8217;s attempts to kneecap Barack Obama in yesterday&#8217;s &quot;interview.&quot; If this is journalism, maybe we&#8217;d all be better off without it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-36862</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/04/28/the-anatomy-of-a-fox-interview/#comment-36862</guid>
		<description>My increasing level of dismay at the conduct of &quot;moderators&quot; in the last three presidential elections has reached a bottom-line disgust.

If I happen to chat with John, Hillary or Barack any time soon, I&#039;ll ask for proposals for illuminating meetings between the candidates for president sans mass-media moderator.

The reason for having a moderator â€” keeping candidates from uttering vague, laudatory statements about their backgrounds and positions on issues â€” has been usurped by blatant electioneering by moderators themselves.

Gee. Surely decent moderators unaffiliated with mass media could be found. Josh, how about you?

Nice post. Thanks for contributing to S&amp;R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My increasing level of dismay at the conduct of &#8220;moderators&#8221; in the last three presidential elections has reached a bottom-line disgust.</p>
<p>If I happen to chat with John, Hillary or Barack any time soon, I&#8217;ll ask for proposals for illuminating meetings between the candidates for president sans mass-media moderator.</p>
<p>The reason for having a moderator â€” keeping candidates from uttering vague, laudatory statements about their backgrounds and positions on issues â€” has been usurped by blatant electioneering by moderators themselves.</p>
<p>Gee. Surely decent moderators unaffiliated with mass media could be found. Josh, how about you?</p>
<p>Nice post. Thanks for contributing to S&#038;R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

