<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negativity in the Crossroads of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/06/negativity-in-the-crossroads-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/06/negativity-in-the-crossroads-of-america/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/06/negativity-in-the-crossroads-of-america/comment-page-1/#comment-38011</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2050#comment-38011</guid>
		<description>Russ:  Good point.  This is especially true given the fact that Indiana usually doesn&#039;t get much of a say in the primary process.  Five pieces of mail in two weeks, along with seeing a few commercials a dozen times each can go a long way.

Dr. D:  That would be quite refreshing, but I don&#039;t see it happening for the Presidency.  I was going to say it was impossible for any federal office, but Russ makes a good point with Kucinich.  I guess Russ Feinfold basically fits that mold, and Paul Wellstone probably did as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ:  Good point.  This is especially true given the fact that Indiana usually doesn&#8217;t get much of a say in the primary process.  Five pieces of mail in two weeks, along with seeing a few commercials a dozen times each can go a long way.</p>
<p>Dr. D:  That would be quite refreshing, but I don&#8217;t see it happening for the Presidency.  I was going to say it was impossible for any federal office, but Russ makes a good point with Kucinich.  I guess Russ Feinfold basically fits that mold, and Paul Wellstone probably did as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/06/negativity-in-the-crossroads-of-america/comment-page-1/#comment-38010</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2050#comment-38010</guid>
		<description>Dr. D,

The House of Representatives is the highest such a candidate (think Kucinich) could rise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. D,</p>
<p>The House of Representatives is the highest such a candidate (think Kucinich) could rise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/06/negativity-in-the-crossroads-of-america/comment-page-1/#comment-37995</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2050#comment-37995</guid>
		<description>Josh,

Thanks (again) for being thorough. I spent the week before the New Hampshire primary there with friends, and saw the same trends in the mailings.

Is it possible for a candidate in this modern era to sufficiently submerge his or her ego to announce a candidacy, state plainly his or her philosophy of governing, offer a platform on various issues, and adapt to new issues that emerge by sticking to principles outlined in that philosophy of governing? Come hell or high water or poor trend polls?

I have waited in vain for a candidate who says, &quot;This is me and what I believe. This is me and what I will do.&quot;

I suppose I am dreaming, and as vet of 20 years in the news biz, I ought to know better. But still, isn&#039;t there someone out there who will not be induced by handlers to bob and weave with the winds of political expediency?

Tell me it&#039;s possible, Josh. Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>Thanks (again) for being thorough. I spent the week before the New Hampshire primary there with friends, and saw the same trends in the mailings.</p>
<p>Is it possible for a candidate in this modern era to sufficiently submerge his or her ego to announce a candidacy, state plainly his or her philosophy of governing, offer a platform on various issues, and adapt to new issues that emerge by sticking to principles outlined in that philosophy of governing? Come hell or high water or poor trend polls?</p>
<p>I have waited in vain for a candidate who says, &#8220;This is me and what I believe. This is me and what I will do.&#8221;</p>
<p>I suppose I am dreaming, and as vet of 20 years in the news biz, I ought to know better. But still, isn&#8217;t there someone out there who will not be induced by handlers to bob and weave with the winds of political expediency?</p>
<p>Tell me it&#8217;s possible, Josh. Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/06/negativity-in-the-crossroads-of-america/comment-page-1/#comment-37987</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2050#comment-37987</guid>
		<description>Thanks for compiling all that. Voters are especially vulnerable to this because many -- most? -- don&#039;t follow the campaign on TV, on the Web or in newspapers. The ads and commercials become their only source of (mis)information about the campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for compiling all that. Voters are especially vulnerable to this because many &#8212; most? &#8212; don&#8217;t follow the campaign on TV, on the Web or in newspapers. The ads and commercials become their only source of (mis)information about the campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

