<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortune 535: How wealthy is Congress?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38882</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38882</guid>
		<description>Brian...It would be nice if the government was run as a meritcoracy.  However, the best minds are always going to be siphoned off by the private sector, leaving the second rate to be the career politicians....on both sides of the aisle.

I&#039;d like to see the government run by engineers, physical scientists, and mathematicians.  They&#039;re the real smart ones out there:)

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian&#8230;It would be nice if the government was run as a meritcoracy.  However, the best minds are always going to be siphoned off by the private sector, leaving the second rate to be the career politicians&#8230;.on both sides of the aisle.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see the government run by engineers, physical scientists, and mathematicians.  They&#8217;re the real smart ones out there:)</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38870</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38870</guid>
		<description>IMO, the only reason someone should ever want to be President is public service.  Alas, I believe as you appear to that power, greed, hubris, etc. are the real reasons for people seeking the Presidency.  And our present system is set up that way.

I&#039;d love to see our federal government run as a pretty strict meritocracy, with the people best qualified to run the country actually doing so.  Wealth and popularity (often purchased with wealth, unsurprisingly) are stupid reasons to vote for someone, yet that&#039;s what happens most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, the only reason someone should ever want to be President is public service.  Alas, I believe as you appear to that power, greed, hubris, etc. are the real reasons for people seeking the Presidency.  And our present system is set up that way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see our federal government run as a pretty strict meritocracy, with the people best qualified to run the country actually doing so.  Wealth and popularity (often purchased with wealth, unsurprisingly) are stupid reasons to vote for someone, yet that&#8217;s what happens most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38868</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38868</guid>
		<description>Dr. Slammy,

I certainly cannot imagine why one would want to have the job of President.  It&#039;s well beyond my capacity to understand the rationale, motivation, or hubris that goes into wanting such a job.  It is my personal belief that &quot;Public Service&quot; is a very minor reason for the three current candidates for the job.  

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Slammy,</p>
<p>I certainly cannot imagine why one would want to have the job of President.  It&#8217;s well beyond my capacity to understand the rationale, motivation, or hubris that goes into wanting such a job.  It is my personal belief that &#8220;Public Service&#8221; is a very minor reason for the three current candidates for the job.  </p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38867</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38867</guid>
		<description>Jeff, let&#039;s think about plausibility here. McCain made a pretty good PR show of being at the point of homelessness during NH, but - we never saw him actually begging for change on street corners, did we? 

As for palatable candidates who weren&#039;t in the race - you imagine they might have been if they&#039;d had McCain&#039;s money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, let&#8217;s think about plausibility here. McCain made a pretty good PR show of being at the point of homelessness during NH, but &#8211; we never saw him actually begging for change on street corners, did we? </p>
<p>As for palatable candidates who weren&#8217;t in the race &#8211; you imagine they might have been if they&#8217;d had McCain&#8217;s money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38864</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38864</guid>
		<description>Dr.Slammy,

There might be a lot of Republicans that might be more palatable than McCain, but none of them were running for president.  At the lowest point of McCains campaign, he was reduced to budget travel.....certainly Cindy would have given him a Gulfstream if she were a good sugarmomma.  You&#039;re right about money mattering.

 I&#039;d like to see the size of Obama&#039;s, Hillary&#039;s, or McCain&#039;s foreign bank amounts.....and before I get flamed for that one: Diversication of assets is a smart thing, and all three of them are very smart.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr.Slammy,</p>
<p>There might be a lot of Republicans that might be more palatable than McCain, but none of them were running for president.  At the lowest point of McCains campaign, he was reduced to budget travel&#8230;..certainly Cindy would have given him a Gulfstream if she were a good sugarmomma.  You&#8217;re right about money mattering.</p>
<p> I&#8217;d like to see the size of Obama&#8217;s, Hillary&#8217;s, or McCain&#8217;s foreign bank amounts&#8230;..and before I get flamed for that one: Diversication of assets is a smart thing, and all three of them are very smart.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38863</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38863</guid>
		<description>Jeff: Now you&#039;re just being disingenuous. There are a lot of Republicans out there who are a LOT more palatable than McDubya, but none of them have a sugar momma like Cindy. It&#039;s ridiculous for us to pretend that money doesn&#039;t matter, on either the GOP or Dem sides of the debate. If John had married a poor woman - or rather, had he not divorced one - there&#039;s no way in hell he&#039;d be the nominee.

As for Hillary, I feel like she&#039;s angling for something. Not sure what she wants - a cabinet post? Can&#039;t see her wanting to be VP, although that could be a possibility. I feel certain Obama knows what she wants and her continued presence in the race suggests that he doesn&#039;t want to give it to her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff: Now you&#8217;re just being disingenuous. There are a lot of Republicans out there who are a LOT more palatable than McDubya, but none of them have a sugar momma like Cindy. It&#8217;s ridiculous for us to pretend that money doesn&#8217;t matter, on either the GOP or Dem sides of the debate. If John had married a poor woman &#8211; or rather, had he not divorced one &#8211; there&#8217;s no way in hell he&#8217;d be the nominee.</p>
<p>As for Hillary, I feel like she&#8217;s angling for something. Not sure what she wants &#8211; a cabinet post? Can&#8217;t see her wanting to be VP, although that could be a possibility. I feel certain Obama knows what she wants and her continued presence in the race suggests that he doesn&#8217;t want to give it to her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38852</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38852</guid>
		<description>McCain is still in the game because he&#039;s the most palatable candidate in our camp, not because of Cindy. He&#039;s considered to be the lesser of evils.  Believe me, many Republicans are suffering over his eventual nomination.  However, I happen to like the guy, as he wants to lower my taxes(which happens to be my personal litmus test).  

On a side note, I&#039;m wondering what Hillary has on Obama....what bombshell she&#039;s going to drop.  She&#039;s known for her tightness with a buck, and is committed to staying in the race. After all, why would she spend about 12 million of her own money for a losing cause???  According to some of my trading buddies(who know these type of things), she has something that is so big as to render Obama unelectable.  If this is mere speculation, I don&#039;t know.  I have heard the same rumors in the financial circles for a couple of weeks, and they are affecting the market spreads.  I don&#039;t know whether to believe these rumours, and don&#039;t really care if they are true or not, but note their existence.  I do know that Hillary plays to win, and has a regal sense of entitlement, and would not put anything past her.   If McCain could make a comeback, and Bill Clinton was the &quot;Come-Back Kid,&quot; why couldn&#039;t Hillary stage a coup?   Stranger things have happened.  I do expect some fireworks, and will enjoy the show:) 

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain is still in the game because he&#8217;s the most palatable candidate in our camp, not because of Cindy. He&#8217;s considered to be the lesser of evils.  Believe me, many Republicans are suffering over his eventual nomination.  However, I happen to like the guy, as he wants to lower my taxes(which happens to be my personal litmus test).  </p>
<p>On a side note, I&#8217;m wondering what Hillary has on Obama&#8230;.what bombshell she&#8217;s going to drop.  She&#8217;s known for her tightness with a buck, and is committed to staying in the race. After all, why would she spend about 12 million of her own money for a losing cause???  According to some of my trading buddies(who know these type of things), she has something that is so big as to render Obama unelectable.  If this is mere speculation, I don&#8217;t know.  I have heard the same rumors in the financial circles for a couple of weeks, and they are affecting the market spreads.  I don&#8217;t know whether to believe these rumours, and don&#8217;t really care if they are true or not, but note their existence.  I do know that Hillary plays to win, and has a regal sense of entitlement, and would not put anything past her.   If McCain could make a comeback, and Bill Clinton was the &#8220;Come-Back Kid,&#8221; why couldn&#8217;t Hillary stage a coup?   Stranger things have happened.  I do expect some fireworks, and will enjoy the show:) </p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38851</guid>
		<description>Jeff, Cindy McCain is a trophy wife whose wealth is the reason John is still in the game. Her lack of partisan will strikes me as just about the most irrelevant thing in the entire campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, Cindy McCain is a trophy wife whose wealth is the reason John is still in the game. Her lack of partisan will strikes me as just about the most irrelevant thing in the entire campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38847</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38847</guid>
		<description>If I were in a public office, I&#039;d be as vague as possible when asked about my net worth, because the current rules allow for vagueness.  

However, I&#039;m an supporter of blind trusts as a requirement for holding a public office.  

I wouldn&#039;t hold my breath waiting for things to change, regarding public disclosure of net worth aand income.  Congress simply doesn&#039;t have the will to force members to make a full and accurate disclosure.

The Republicans were howling for Teresa Heinz Kerry&#039;s returns because she was very political, with donations approaching those of George Soros(The Palindrome).  Cindy McCain is just a trophy wife, without an original thought in her head.  She doesn&#039;t matter in the equation, as she&#039;s more concerned with shopping.  Oddly, she has one of the finest collections of Frederic Remington&#039;s works, from what I&#039;ve been told.



Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were in a public office, I&#8217;d be as vague as possible when asked about my net worth, because the current rules allow for vagueness.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m an supporter of blind trusts as a requirement for holding a public office.  </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath waiting for things to change, regarding public disclosure of net worth aand income.  Congress simply doesn&#8217;t have the will to force members to make a full and accurate disclosure.</p>
<p>The Republicans were howling for Teresa Heinz Kerry&#8217;s returns because she was very political, with donations approaching those of George Soros(The Palindrome).  Cindy McCain is just a trophy wife, without an original thought in her head.  She doesn&#8217;t matter in the equation, as she&#8217;s more concerned with shopping.  Oddly, she has one of the finest collections of Frederic Remington&#8217;s works, from what I&#8217;ve been told.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38748</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38748</guid>
		<description>Four short years ago, by the way, Republicans far and wide were howling for Teresa Heinz Kerry to make her tax returns public. Those same folks are oddly silent about Cindy McCain.

Frankly, I&#039;m baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four short years ago, by the way, Republicans far and wide were howling for Teresa Heinz Kerry to make her tax returns public. Those same folks are oddly silent about Cindy McCain.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/05/13/fortune-435-how-wealthy-is-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-38747</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2087#comment-38747</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fortune 435: How wealthy is Congress?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Fortune 435 is great fun, but its worth is not its revelation of congressional wealth; rather, it demonstrates the weaknesses in the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 that requires financial disclosures by members of Congress....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fortune 435: How wealthy is Congress?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Fortune 435 is great fun, but its worth is not its revelation of congressional wealth; rather, it demonstrates the weaknesses in the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 that requires financial disclosures by members of Congress&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

