<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decision 2008: let&#8217;s yank the hood off racist America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:32:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; America&#8217;s Negro Cracker Problem: none of us are free</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-2/#comment-54695</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; America&#8217;s Negro Cracker Problem: none of us are free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-54695</guid>
		<description>[...] different, though, is what I said back in June. Make no mistake, in the coming months you’re going to see the ugliest artillery that our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] different, though, is what I said back in June. Make no mistake, in the coming months you’re going to see the ugliest artillery that our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; America&#8217;s Negro Cracker Problem: ich bin ein Auslander</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-2/#comment-54596</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; America&#8217;s Negro Cracker Problem: ich bin ein Auslander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-54596</guid>
		<description>[...] said some time back, as the presidential election lurched into overdrive, that the heavy racist stuff was coming. Not that it necessarily took Nostradamus to predict that, of course - as staggering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said some time back, as the presidential election lurched into overdrive, that the heavy racist stuff was coming. Not that it necessarily took Nostradamus to predict that, of course &#8211; as staggering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Hood check: Texas GOP thinks racism is funny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-2/#comment-43400</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Hood check: Texas GOP thinks racism is funny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-43400</guid>
		<description>[...] elections, politics, race relations [ Comments: none ]     As I said a couple weeks ago, let&#8217;s yank the hood off racist America. Seriously, we know you&#8217;re out there, so let&#8217;s get it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] elections, politics, race relations [ Comments: none ]     As I said a couple weeks ago, let&#8217;s yank the hood off racist America. Seriously, we know you&#8217;re out there, so let&#8217;s get it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Obama and racism around the world</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-2/#comment-42479</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Obama and racism around the world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-42479</guid>
		<description>[...] politics, race relations [ Comments: none ]     As of last week, we here at S&amp;R decided to yank the hood off of racist America during this Presidential election. To that end, we&#8217;re going to be exposing racism wherever we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] politics, race relations [ Comments: none ]     As of last week, we here at S&#38;R decided to yank the hood off of racist America during this Presidential election. To that end, we&#8217;re going to be exposing racism wherever we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make No Laws &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Increase in Racism?</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-2/#comment-42213</link>
		<dc:creator>Make No Laws &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Increase in Racism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-42213</guid>
		<description>[...] only get worse as Obama wraps up the Democratic nomination and moves on to the general election.Â This could get really ugly, but at least one person thinks that its a good idea to bring all this ou.... (Read this, then come [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only get worse as Obama wraps up the Democratic nomination and moves on to the general election.Â This could get really ugly, but at least one person thinks that its a good idea to bring all this ou&#8230;. (Read this, then come [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Chait</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41932</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Chait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41932</guid>
		<description>Whatever comes out of the US election, remember this ... the US will be the first democratic nation to even contemplate electing a visible minority in the modern age.

Whatever happens, everyone will be watching.  And I, for one, think that the race issue has been rather subdued.  For real race-hate politics, please take a look at present-day South Africa some time.

Congrats, the US is proving its maturity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever comes out of the US election, remember this &#8230; the US will be the first democratic nation to even contemplate electing a visible minority in the modern age.</p>
<p>Whatever happens, everyone will be watching.  And I, for one, think that the race issue has been rather subdued.  For real race-hate politics, please take a look at present-day South Africa some time.</p>
<p>Congrats, the US is proving its maturity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41733</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41733</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Now it makes more sense.  I didn&#039;t realize your anger was pre-existing, dating back to the actual primary and the coverage surrounding it. I &lt;i&gt;thought&lt;/i&gt; it seemed far out of proportion to the possible stimulus of this particular conversation, and that was what I was asking. If descending into personal attacks is not a method of argument you respect, I have to believe it would serve you far better as an intelligent, articulate person to refrain from it yourself, even under provocation - and especially under a perceived provocation of the exact same type. This is precisely what I meant by &quot;giving each other credit.&quot;  Maybe it&#039;s an impossible dream.

Thank you for at least not deleting your original answer before lumping me in with everyone else who wearies you. Serves me right for having a Rodney King moment in public, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Now it makes more sense.  I didn&#8217;t realize your anger was pre-existing, dating back to the actual primary and the coverage surrounding it. I <i>thought</i> it seemed far out of proportion to the possible stimulus of this particular conversation, and that was what I was asking. If descending into personal attacks is not a method of argument you respect, I have to believe it would serve you far better as an intelligent, articulate person to refrain from it yourself, even under provocation &#8211; and especially under a perceived provocation of the exact same type. This is precisely what I meant by &#8220;giving each other credit.&#8221;  Maybe it&#8217;s an impossible dream.</p>
<p>Thank you for at least not deleting your original answer before lumping me in with everyone else who wearies you. Serves me right for having a Rodney King moment in public, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Compton</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41689</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Compton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41689</guid>
		<description>JS: Just saw your remarkably patronizing comment.

While you&#039;re welcome to add whever subtext you like to the point I was originally trying to make, I&#039;m done with this conversation. Being one of the unwashed and uneducated masses, my observations and experiences are clearly without value. Congratulations on having the money to get an education with which you can insult and belittle others. Quite an accomplishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS: Just saw your remarkably patronizing comment.</p>
<p>While you&#8217;re welcome to add whever subtext you like to the point I was originally trying to make, I&#8217;m done with this conversation. Being one of the unwashed and uneducated masses, my observations and experiences are clearly without value. Congratulations on having the money to get an education with which you can insult and belittle others. Quite an accomplishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Compton</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41679</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Compton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41679</guid>
		<description>Euphrosyne: I would say the biggest factors are geographic/linguistic, and financial. If you are a fellow Appalachian, regardless of what specific city/state you hail from originally, you will be much (much) more readily accepted. Anyone with a distinctly different accent will be met with immediate suspicion, based on the assumption that you are &#039;up to something&#039;....That you are there to exploit the locals in one way or another (an antiques dealer from the north trying to buy family heirlooms at drastically under-market prices, for example). Historically, Appalachia and it&#039;s people have been heavily exploited - Couple that with an almost universal lack of respect and persistent stereotyping, and one can begin to understand how a basic mistrust of others has been ingrained in much of the population.

The attitudes towards wealth are varied and change depending on context. Broadly, the very wealthy are seen as corrupt to the core. When it comes to wealthy locals (born and bred) however, the attitude changes and they are seen with respectful admiration. The view of the very poor seems to be dependent on the reason for their circumstances, real or imagined. Of course, all of this is said in the broadest possible terms, and the people and attitudes there are as varied as they are anywhere else in the world.

Regarding attitudes towards women, I think that the area&#039;s Christian traditions informs their view of gender roles.

 Beyond that though, I think it&#039;s difficult to say....same old story. My sister visited WV, and was one day subjected to extremely rude treatment at a local BP gas station (by a single individual, in a manner that did not reveal the thinking behind the clerk&#039;s attitude). Was it because she was a female? Was it because she is a person of color? Was the clerk an incredibly sweet person who just happened to be having a horrible day? Who knows.

edit: Didn&#039;t see your other comment before posting, . RE &quot;I canâ€™t find any statement in this post or in this thread that West Virginians are the most racist bastards on earth, so why the animus?&quot;

 The time surrounding the WV primary saw a barrage of poorly informed attacks on the people of the state. I met so many good people during my time there that I take these attacks very personally. The &#039;logic&#039; I have seen in support of these attacks is consistently flimsy and can be applied to any state, yet the good people of WV are repeatedly singled out as being particularly racist. It&#039;s nonsense, pure and simple. As for you belief that JS &quot;has my number&quot; - you&#039;re certainly entitled to your opinion, as is he/she. I&#039;m so weary of it all - think as you like. I know the people of West Virginia better that most I&#039;ve heard from online - and they will always have my respect and admiration. AdiÃ³s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euphrosyne: I would say the biggest factors are geographic/linguistic, and financial. If you are a fellow Appalachian, regardless of what specific city/state you hail from originally, you will be much (much) more readily accepted. Anyone with a distinctly different accent will be met with immediate suspicion, based on the assumption that you are &#8216;up to something&#8217;&#8230;.That you are there to exploit the locals in one way or another (an antiques dealer from the north trying to buy family heirlooms at drastically under-market prices, for example). Historically, Appalachia and it&#8217;s people have been heavily exploited &#8211; Couple that with an almost universal lack of respect and persistent stereotyping, and one can begin to understand how a basic mistrust of others has been ingrained in much of the population.</p>
<p>The attitudes towards wealth are varied and change depending on context. Broadly, the very wealthy are seen as corrupt to the core. When it comes to wealthy locals (born and bred) however, the attitude changes and they are seen with respectful admiration. The view of the very poor seems to be dependent on the reason for their circumstances, real or imagined. Of course, all of this is said in the broadest possible terms, and the people and attitudes there are as varied as they are anywhere else in the world.</p>
<p>Regarding attitudes towards women, I think that the area&#8217;s Christian traditions informs their view of gender roles.</p>
<p> Beyond that though, I think it&#8217;s difficult to say&#8230;.same old story. My sister visited WV, and was one day subjected to extremely rude treatment at a local BP gas station (by a single individual, in a manner that did not reveal the thinking behind the clerk&#8217;s attitude). Was it because she was a female? Was it because she is a person of color? Was the clerk an incredibly sweet person who just happened to be having a horrible day? Who knows.</p>
<p>edit: Didn&#8217;t see your other comment before posting, . RE &#8220;I canâ€™t find any statement in this post or in this thread that West Virginians are the most racist bastards on earth, so why the animus?&#8221;</p>
<p> The time surrounding the WV primary saw a barrage of poorly informed attacks on the people of the state. I met so many good people during my time there that I take these attacks very personally. The &#8216;logic&#8217; I have seen in support of these attacks is consistently flimsy and can be applied to any state, yet the good people of WV are repeatedly singled out as being particularly racist. It&#8217;s nonsense, pure and simple. As for you belief that JS &#8220;has my number&#8221; &#8211; you&#8217;re certainly entitled to your opinion, as is he/she. I&#8217;m so weary of it all &#8211; think as you like. I know the people of West Virginia better that most I&#8217;ve heard from online &#8211; and they will always have my respect and admiration. AdiÃ³s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41636</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41636</guid>
		<description>&quot;Canâ€™t we give each other any credit for good faith at all?&quot;

Dr S posts in good faith.  As a consequence I&#039;ve visited net places I would otherwise have avoided like the plague.

Considering how the internet reveals far more about the mind than polls (whether on exit or not and have been known to be wrong on more than one occasion - including getting the results of a British General Election wrong based on poll exit numbers) I think Jonny Foreigner can learn a lot without actually personally interviewing each individual in the entire world.  The net has revealed to me just how racist people are.  More so than moving in my little world on the ground.

Obama had/has an uphill struggle but I for one would help him if I were an American.  As a Brit I want him in the White House rather than the other 2.

I believe Obama is running for President in good faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Canâ€™t we give each other any credit for good faith at all?&#8221;</p>
<p>Dr S posts in good faith.  As a consequence I&#8217;ve visited net places I would otherwise have avoided like the plague.</p>
<p>Considering how the internet reveals far more about the mind than polls (whether on exit or not and have been known to be wrong on more than one occasion &#8211; including getting the results of a British General Election wrong based on poll exit numbers) I think Jonny Foreigner can learn a lot without actually personally interviewing each individual in the entire world.  The net has revealed to me just how racist people are.  More so than moving in my little world on the ground.</p>
<p>Obama had/has an uphill struggle but I for one would help him if I were an American.  As a Brit I want him in the White House rather than the other 2.</p>
<p>I believe Obama is running for President in good faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41631</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41631</guid>
		<description>As much as it may pain me to admit it, I think JS has your number, Michael. Unless you have telepathic powers we know not of, I&#039;d back growing up in an area versus passing through it as the more useful set of experiences any day... As for Appalachia, of which I have absolutely no personal knowledge, the kind of hidden attitudes to which Sam and JS refer surely wouldn&#039;t be freely shared with those strangers they mistrust so deeply? How could you truly &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt;? And why can&#039;t we use West Virginia as one example, supported by actual exit polls, of this particular problem in American society? I can&#039;t find any statement in this post or in this thread that West Virginians are the most racist bastards on earth, so why the animus?

I find it interesting (make that depressing) that false accusations are a recurring theme in this thread, while several of the participants are more than willing to immediately see an anecdote or an analogy as a personal attack and start hurling epithets in return. Can&#039;t we give each other any credit for good faith at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as it may pain me to admit it, I think JS has your number, Michael. Unless you have telepathic powers we know not of, I&#8217;d back growing up in an area versus passing through it as the more useful set of experiences any day&#8230; As for Appalachia, of which I have absolutely no personal knowledge, the kind of hidden attitudes to which Sam and JS refer surely wouldn&#8217;t be freely shared with those strangers they mistrust so deeply? How could you truly <i>know</i>? And why can&#8217;t we use West Virginia as one example, supported by actual exit polls, of this particular problem in American society? I can&#8217;t find any statement in this post or in this thread that West Virginians are the most racist bastards on earth, so why the animus?</p>
<p>I find it interesting (make that depressing) that false accusations are a recurring theme in this thread, while several of the participants are more than willing to immediately see an anecdote or an analogy as a personal attack and start hurling epithets in return. Can&#8217;t we give each other any credit for good faith at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41625</link>
		<dc:creator>JS O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41625</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;To answer your question I have not visited West Virginia, but then again that doesnâ€™t stop me from feeling that the people there have all been branded racists even though some of them might well hold that title while others wouldnâ€™t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why is it that we get so many non-Americans here who know little about the place,  have visited little or none of it, and yet lecture us on the attributes of our own country and its various parts?  And why is it that a media story in which a poll revealed that 20% of the voters in one state claimed that race was a factor in their voting decisions becomes &quot;the people there have &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; (emphasis mine) been branded racists&quot; by the same foreigner?  Tell me, foreigner, do the schools in your country teach you that 20% equals &quot;all&quot;?  If so, then perhaps we&#039;ve found the root of our disagreement.

And how about  

&lt;blockquote&gt;It was the media who divided up your population into camps of white and black, rich and poor, educated or not, good jobs, poor jobs., etc,&lt;/blockquote&gt;.  

You jump on me for failing in a single word to make an analogy clear, then jump on me again by saying you won&#039;t answer my interpretation of your words which is, simply, that the media caused all the racial problems in America. There are no real underlying grievances, are there foreigner?

As for all this happening 50+ years ago (your words), I&#039;m 51.  I remember these events vividly.  I attended a segregated school until 1969, the fall after men landed on the moon.  Other school systems didn&#039;t desegregate unti lthe mid-70s.  The university in my state didn&#039;t admit &quot; negroes&quot; until 1970, 38 years ago, I believe.  That same university, today, is a place where black students rarely mix with the rest of the student body.  Not a whole lot has changed.

So, why did you say 50+ years?  With your deep understanding of the US, its regions, and US history, surely you know better? &#039;-)

Michael:

I have heard your words (or words like them) since I was knee high to a cypress stump.  Let me just recall a few:

&quot;Yankees is just like us.  They hate niggers as much as we do.  They just don&#039;t admit it.&quot;

&quot;I love niggers.  I think everyone should own a couple.&quot;

&quot;I&#039;m not prejudiced, but niggers is lazy.  Everyone knows that.&quot;

&quot;You cain&#039;t hurt a nigger by hittin&#039; him in the head.  He ain&#039;t got nothin&#039; but bone of there no ways.&quot;

&quot;People are pretty much the same ever&#039;where.  They all hate niggers.&quot;

You just keep on believing that there is no such thing as cultural norms of behavior and thought, Michael.  And keep on believing that these things don&#039;t vary, ever, from place to place.   You won&#039;t get any supporters from people who actually research and/or read in the area of cultural anthropology, but that&#039;s no matter, is it?

Opinion is all, even when it&#039;s unread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To answer your question I have not visited West Virginia, but then again that doesnâ€™t stop me from feeling that the people there have all been branded racists even though some of them might well hold that title while others wouldnâ€™t.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why is it that we get so many non-Americans here who know little about the place,  have visited little or none of it, and yet lecture us on the attributes of our own country and its various parts?  And why is it that a media story in which a poll revealed that 20% of the voters in one state claimed that race was a factor in their voting decisions becomes &#8220;the people there have <i>all</i> (emphasis mine) been branded racists&#8221; by the same foreigner?  Tell me, foreigner, do the schools in your country teach you that 20% equals &#8220;all&#8221;?  If so, then perhaps we&#8217;ve found the root of our disagreement.</p>
<p>And how about  </p>
<blockquote><p>It was the media who divided up your population into camps of white and black, rich and poor, educated or not, good jobs, poor jobs., etc,</p></blockquote>
<p>.  </p>
<p>You jump on me for failing in a single word to make an analogy clear, then jump on me again by saying you won&#8217;t answer my interpretation of your words which is, simply, that the media caused all the racial problems in America. There are no real underlying grievances, are there foreigner?</p>
<p>As for all this happening 50+ years ago (your words), I&#8217;m 51.  I remember these events vividly.  I attended a segregated school until 1969, the fall after men landed on the moon.  Other school systems didn&#8217;t desegregate unti lthe mid-70s.  The university in my state didn&#8217;t admit &#8221; negroes&#8221; until 1970, 38 years ago, I believe.  That same university, today, is a place where black students rarely mix with the rest of the student body.  Not a whole lot has changed.</p>
<p>So, why did you say 50+ years?  With your deep understanding of the US, its regions, and US history, surely you know better? &#8216;-)</p>
<p>Michael:</p>
<p>I have heard your words (or words like them) since I was knee high to a cypress stump.  Let me just recall a few:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yankees is just like us.  They hate niggers as much as we do.  They just don&#8217;t admit it.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I love niggers.  I think everyone should own a couple.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not prejudiced, but niggers is lazy.  Everyone knows that.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;You cain&#8217;t hurt a nigger by hittin&#8217; him in the head.  He ain&#8217;t got nothin&#8217; but bone of there no ways.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;People are pretty much the same ever&#8217;where.  They all hate niggers.&#8221;</p>
<p>You just keep on believing that there is no such thing as cultural norms of behavior and thought, Michael.  And keep on believing that these things don&#8217;t vary, ever, from place to place.   You won&#8217;t get any supporters from people who actually research and/or read in the area of cultural anthropology, but that&#8217;s no matter, is it?</p>
<p>Opinion is all, even when it&#8217;s unread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41615</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41615</guid>
		<description>Wait, ignore #41. Sam has already said that about four times by now. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, ignore #41. Sam has already said that about four times by now. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41611</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41611</guid>
		<description>Dan, I don&#039;t think that Argyle was dismissing out of hand the validity of exposing false accusations of racism; he (or she, I don&#039;t know) was pointing out that a) the overwhelmingly more important issue is the greater one of racism itself and b) if actual racism in all its forms is held up to unsparing scrutiny, false accusations will become so readily apparent as to expose their own illegitimacy.

At least, that&#039;s what I read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I don&#8217;t think that Argyle was dismissing out of hand the validity of exposing false accusations of racism; he (or she, I don&#8217;t know) was pointing out that a) the overwhelmingly more important issue is the greater one of racism itself and b) if actual racism in all its forms is held up to unsparing scrutiny, false accusations will become so readily apparent as to expose their own illegitimacy.</p>
<p>At least, that&#8217;s what I read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41604</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41604</guid>
		<description>
argyle, June 3, 2008 at 6:32 am said:
&quot;No, were not going to have the same discussion on the â€œfalse cries of racismâ€ that we are on the strong undercurrent of genial racism that has been festering in this country for 40 years&quot;

Yes we will, you cannot stifle the discussion of a valid issue. 

False accusations of racism and sexism dilute the truth and cause harm in the end.

Obama 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>argyle, June 3, 2008 at 6:32 am said:<br />
&#8220;No, were not going to have the same discussion on the â€œfalse cries of racismâ€ that we are on the strong undercurrent of genial racism that has been festering in this country for 40 years&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes we will, you cannot stifle the discussion of a valid issue. </p>
<p>False accusations of racism and sexism dilute the truth and cause harm in the end.</p>
<p>Obama 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41603</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41603</guid>
		<description>Michael, would you say from your own experience in Appalachia that there are gradations of distrust, depending on the race or sex or geographic origin or whatever of the stranger? Or is it truly a blanket xenophobia, based solely on &quot;you&#039;re not from around here?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, would you say from your own experience in Appalachia that there are gradations of distrust, depending on the race or sex or geographic origin or whatever of the stranger? Or is it truly a blanket xenophobia, based solely on &#8220;you&#8217;re not from around here?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Compton</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41597</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Compton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41597</guid>
		<description>Obviously not, Dr.S.  I hope your point isn&#039;t that this is the case with WV, as that is simply not true. By what scale can a geographic region be accurately judged? Racism is institutionalized everywhere in this country - but the people themselves? I find that they are largely the same everywhere. The type of racism I most frequently encounter is far more subtle/deeper than that of some simple idiot in a hood - and this was no more pervasive in WV than anywhere else. 

My own personal experience in Appalachia has shown me that people there are no more or less racist (whether subtle or overt) in their reaction to me than in any other part of the country. I have also spent time in KY (though I never lived there), and found this to hold true there as well, for the most part. Appalachians don&#039;t trust/like strangers - it isn&#039;t about race</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously not, Dr.S.  I hope your point isn&#8217;t that this is the case with WV, as that is simply not true. By what scale can a geographic region be accurately judged? Racism is institutionalized everywhere in this country &#8211; but the people themselves? I find that they are largely the same everywhere. The type of racism I most frequently encounter is far more subtle/deeper than that of some simple idiot in a hood &#8211; and this was no more pervasive in WV than anywhere else. </p>
<p>My own personal experience in Appalachia has shown me that people there are no more or less racist (whether subtle or overt) in their reaction to me than in any other part of the country. I have also spent time in KY (though I never lived there), and found this to hold true there as well, for the most part. Appalachians don&#8217;t trust/like strangers &#8211; it isn&#8217;t about race</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41596</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41596</guid>
		<description>Michael: yes, there is racism everywhere. Does this mean, then, that in your view a place that&#039;s comprised of 99% racists is functionally the same as a place comprised of 1% racists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: yes, there is racism everywhere. Does this mean, then, that in your view a place that&#8217;s comprised of 99% racists is functionally the same as a place comprised of 1% racists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Compton</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41592</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Compton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41592</guid>
		<description>lol, yes JS.....Clearly, that&#039;s exactly what the point I was making. Kudos to you for addressing the issue, rather than engaging in pointless sarcasm and obfuscation.

Obviously there is context cannot be addressed in one paragraph, but racism exists everywhere, and does to a degree that is (hopefully) unacceptable to everyone here. To single West Virginia out as particularly racist is absurd, especially when &#039;supported&#039; by the silly, superficial points offered by your original post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, yes JS&#8230;..Clearly, that&#8217;s exactly what the point I was making. Kudos to you for addressing the issue, rather than engaging in pointless sarcasm and obfuscation.</p>
<p>Obviously there is context cannot be addressed in one paragraph, but racism exists everywhere, and does to a degree that is (hopefully) unacceptable to everyone here. To single West Virginia out as particularly racist is absurd, especially when &#8217;supported&#8217; by the silly, superficial points offered by your original post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foreigner</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/02/decision-2008-lets-yank-the-hood-off-of-racist-america/comment-page-1/#comment-41590</link>
		<dc:creator>foreigner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2171#comment-41590</guid>
		<description>First of all to Dr. Slammy:
Thanks for your response and the offer to continue reading and commenting. I appreciate it and thank you. 

Now To JS OBrien:
Your words as written:
You remind me of the kid I knew from the county where I grew up who, in the 9th grade or so, cold cocked another kid, beating him unconscious.................................

It seems that your words to me mean that I remind you of a kid, whereas you could have stated that my words bring to mind a story about a kid. I did not twist your words but took them at face value as they were delivered.
To answer your question I have not visited West Virginia, but then again that doesn&#039;t stop me from feeling that the people there have all been branded racists even though some of them might well hold that title while others wouldn&#039;t. You can&#039;t brand a whole state like that unless you also are willing to consider that states where 90+% of the black population are also considered voting on race only.  Perhaps also many people who live in WV  also have the upbringing or standards that when asked a question you answer truthfully whether the answer is popular or not. What about the people of Pennsylvania who were also called closet racists as well?  What label are you going to pin on them?  Your mention of the ills of racism over 50+ years ago in relation to my mention of the media race today do not relate at all so I am not even going to address them. The media has made this a campaign of division between the democratic party and have fuelled the fires at every chance they can, in my opinion once again. You cannot have the facts of Obama supporters discussed as mainly black,  young, well educated, more affluent,  white collar workers, and elite, while having the Hillary supporters  branded (and I use that term specifically) as white, older, poor, blue collar working class, less educated, racist. If your party plans on being successful, then please think of what  one group of supporters have been classed as because they don&#039;t support the other candidate who happens to be black. Perhaps the fact that Obama is black has nothing  at all to do with the decisions of some  but the fact that people are being put into a nasty little box as poor dumb and racist that may turn them off enough to vote McCain or stay home. I am sure that the over 17,000,000 who have voted for Hillary are not all closet racists nor should Obama&#039;s race be the only factor taken into account for people not choosing him as their chosen candidate.  I still feel you can not heel or cure the ills of the past by using them  falsely in a political campaign.  I will be extremely honest in saying as a white senior citizen myself, that if I were a Hillary supporter being classed generally as a poor dumb closet racist because I didn&#039;t choose Obama, then I personally would not vote for him now. But then perhaps my decision would be based on my age and life experiences as wll as the decisions of what I would consider the qualifications for a President to be.  
A dialogue on race and even religion is sorely needed in today&#039;s environment but how it will be approached has to be weighed very seriously as to whether the outcome will be more successful than more dismal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all to Dr. Slammy:<br />
Thanks for your response and the offer to continue reading and commenting. I appreciate it and thank you. </p>
<p>Now To JS OBrien:<br />
Your words as written:<br />
You remind me of the kid I knew from the county where I grew up who, in the 9th grade or so, cold cocked another kid, beating him unconscious&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems that your words to me mean that I remind you of a kid, whereas you could have stated that my words bring to mind a story about a kid. I did not twist your words but took them at face value as they were delivered.<br />
To answer your question I have not visited West Virginia, but then again that doesn&#8217;t stop me from feeling that the people there have all been branded racists even though some of them might well hold that title while others wouldn&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t brand a whole state like that unless you also are willing to consider that states where 90+% of the black population are also considered voting on race only.  Perhaps also many people who live in WV  also have the upbringing or standards that when asked a question you answer truthfully whether the answer is popular or not. What about the people of Pennsylvania who were also called closet racists as well?  What label are you going to pin on them?  Your mention of the ills of racism over 50+ years ago in relation to my mention of the media race today do not relate at all so I am not even going to address them. The media has made this a campaign of division between the democratic party and have fuelled the fires at every chance they can, in my opinion once again. You cannot have the facts of Obama supporters discussed as mainly black,  young, well educated, more affluent,  white collar workers, and elite, while having the Hillary supporters  branded (and I use that term specifically) as white, older, poor, blue collar working class, less educated, racist. If your party plans on being successful, then please think of what  one group of supporters have been classed as because they don&#8217;t support the other candidate who happens to be black. Perhaps the fact that Obama is black has nothing  at all to do with the decisions of some  but the fact that people are being put into a nasty little box as poor dumb and racist that may turn them off enough to vote McCain or stay home. I am sure that the over 17,000,000 who have voted for Hillary are not all closet racists nor should Obama&#8217;s race be the only factor taken into account for people not choosing him as their chosen candidate.  I still feel you can not heel or cure the ills of the past by using them  falsely in a political campaign.  I will be extremely honest in saying as a white senior citizen myself, that if I were a Hillary supporter being classed generally as a poor dumb closet racist because I didn&#8217;t choose Obama, then I personally would not vote for him now. But then perhaps my decision would be based on my age and life experiences as wll as the decisions of what I would consider the qualifications for a President to be.<br />
A dialogue on race and even religion is sorely needed in today&#8217;s environment but how it will be approached has to be weighed very seriously as to whether the outcome will be more successful than more dismal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
