<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Larry Johnson: Pariah or jeremiah?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:43:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42448</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42448</guid>
		<description>But my question is when did Larry Johnson transform into the type of person who would do something so questionable?

I don&#039;t think he has and that he has our best interests at heart. Read his posts, especially his latest. They make an awful lot of sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But my question is when did Larry Johnson transform into the type of person who would do something so questionable?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he has and that he has our best interests at heart. Read his posts, especially his latest. They make an awful lot of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sheehan</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42407</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sheehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42407</guid>
		<description>Russ, you&#039;re wrong on this.  And you&#039;re making a mistake giving it any validation whatsoever.  The &quot;tape&quot; is a bullshit smear job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, you&#8217;re wrong on this.  And you&#8217;re making a mistake giving it any validation whatsoever.  The &#8220;tape&#8221; is a bullshit smear job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tictacgo</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42352</link>
		<dc:creator>tictacgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42352</guid>
		<description>That statement by the Obama camp is a general statement of strategy and which said nothing about the tape or any other made-up-crap. Regardless of what Michelle might ever have said or did, even if she was a member of Liz Cheney&#039;s book club, she would be target practice for Republicans in November. Why? If you can&#039;t bring down an honest man any other way, attack his family. 

Trust me. This election is going to plumb the depths of despicability. This tape thing is just the first drop. Its going to be her thesis (black power!), her words (she really wasn&#039;t proud of america ... jeez, she must be like an evil transformer robot or something), her clothes - yes her clothes, she makes condi look like an amateur in the how-to-dress-up-like-a-strong-sexy-black-woman category, and &quot;some say&quot; that that&#039;s &quot;just not right&quot;, and every other possible way to bring her, and as a corollary her husband, down.

At the end of day this election will come down to &quot;us&quot; vs. &quot;them&quot;, as in cast your oppenents either as co-players or as hated enemies. For Obama the &quot;us&quot; is all of us. The &quot;them&quot; are the actual problems that plague our society not the people themselves. Repubs will try to convince voters that if you are in the &quot;us&quot; category, you better watch for out for &quot;them&quot;. A not so subtle difference in philosophy,
but easily lost in all the noise.

Question is Russ are your posts really an attempt (unwilling or otherwise) to play the Repub strategy by painting MO as one of &quot;them &quot;?

Primary&#039;s over. Now the &quot;fun part&quot; starts. I for one will not refrain from calling out a foul when I see one. One cannot afford to be blase about confronting such tactics especially in a campaign which will eventually revolve entirely around innuendo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That statement by the Obama camp is a general statement of strategy and which said nothing about the tape or any other made-up-crap. Regardless of what Michelle might ever have said or did, even if she was a member of Liz Cheney&#8217;s book club, she would be target practice for Republicans in November. Why? If you can&#8217;t bring down an honest man any other way, attack his family. </p>
<p>Trust me. This election is going to plumb the depths of despicability. This tape thing is just the first drop. Its going to be her thesis (black power!), her words (she really wasn&#8217;t proud of america &#8230; jeez, she must be like an evil transformer robot or something), her clothes &#8211; yes her clothes, she makes condi look like an amateur in the how-to-dress-up-like-a-strong-sexy-black-woman category, and &#8220;some say&#8221; that that&#8217;s &#8220;just not right&#8221;, and every other possible way to bring her, and as a corollary her husband, down.</p>
<p>At the end of day this election will come down to &#8220;us&#8221; vs. &#8220;them&#8221;, as in cast your oppenents either as co-players or as hated enemies. For Obama the &#8220;us&#8221; is all of us. The &#8220;them&#8221; are the actual problems that plague our society not the people themselves. Repubs will try to convince voters that if you are in the &#8220;us&#8221; category, you better watch for out for &#8220;them&#8221;. A not so subtle difference in philosophy,<br />
but easily lost in all the noise.</p>
<p>Question is Russ are your posts really an attempt (unwilling or otherwise) to play the Repub strategy by painting MO as one of &#8220;them &#8220;?</p>
<p>Primary&#8217;s over. Now the &#8220;fun part&#8221; starts. I for one will not refrain from calling out a foul when I see one. One cannot afford to be blase about confronting such tactics especially in a campaign which will eventually revolve entirely around innuendo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42320</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42320</guid>
		<description>I just think that such a tape is entirely within the realm of possibility and we need to be prepared. Obama camp seems to agree:
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Recognizing the extent to which Republicans view Michelle Obamaâ€™s strong views and personality as a potential liability for her husband, Mr. Obamaâ€™s aides said they were preparing to bring aboard senior operatives from previous Democratic presidential campaigns. . . . devoted to responding to attacks and challenges.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just think that such a tape is entirely within the realm of possibility and we need to be prepared. Obama camp seems to agree:</p>
<blockquote><p>Recognizing the extent to which Republicans view Michelle Obamaâ€™s strong views and personality as a potential liability for her husband, Mr. Obamaâ€™s aides said they were preparing to bring aboard senior operatives from previous Democratic presidential campaigns. . . . devoted to responding to attacks and challenges.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42319</guid>
		<description>You know, the rumor has been percolating for days now. And in this age, where NOTHING manages not to get out ... still no tape.

First things first. Show me the tape. Until then, this is a cheap smear and I don&#039;t think we need to help it along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the rumor has been percolating for days now. And in this age, where NOTHING manages not to get out &#8230; still no tape.</p>
<p>First things first. Show me the tape. Until then, this is a cheap smear and I don&#8217;t think we need to help it along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tictacgo</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42278</link>
		<dc:creator>tictacgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42278</guid>
		<description>Dear Russ,

Don&#039;t take this personally. I&#039;m not sure whether you are a scholar, a rogue or an enabler. For definition of the last word google &quot;enabler faux democrat fox news&quot;.

You clearly have not been following Larry Johnson&#039;s antics or perhaps you caveat all of his other attempts at Obama-baiting as you do for this latest and lowest one. Larry Johnson (his wonderful resume notwithstanding) is one of the thugs in the Clinton mafia whose membership includes other notables such as Geraldine Ferraro, James Carville, Terry McCalledit etc. His not so subtle assignment has been to sabotage Obama with a rumor campaign. The non-existent tape in question is a good example. The question of whether such a tape exists or not becomes irrelevant when scholars such as yourself who offer themselves up as carriers of the following meme.

a. Michelle Obama has strong views. 

b. Said views have tended to include strong words easily twisted, taken out of context (She said that white people are whaaaa ....)

c. Queue Larry Johnson with story of tape, keywords &quot;michelle obama&quot;, &quot;whitey&quot;

d. White america get ready to shit your pants.

Now I&#039;m not calling you any names (the r-word etc.) I&#039;m just saying that you are either poorly informed, gullible and/or a patsy. I have a tape that says so.

To summarize: the point of a rumor campaign is the rumor itself. As Obama said in response (and as you somehow left out of your article):

â€œWe have seen this before. There is dirt and lies that are circulated in e-mails and they pump them out long enough until finally you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about it,â€ Obama said to the McClatchy reporter during a press conference aboard his campaign plane. â€œThat gives legs to the story. If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.â€

And you just gave the story two more legs. Thanks Russ.

BREAKING: THE REAL WHITEY TAPE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_6RXVs9_GI

ps: you wind up your argument by citing a comment from LJ&#039;s page. Come on man. I guess I beat up on you enough already so I&#039;ll just say: &quot;Homey, don&#039;t play dat way&quot;

pps: &quot;Black Jesus&quot; ???!!! WTF ??!! Being half-black isn&#039;t a enough of a handicap (as in golf). Now he has to defend himself from accusations of being the son of god ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Russ,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take this personally. I&#8217;m not sure whether you are a scholar, a rogue or an enabler. For definition of the last word google &#8220;enabler faux democrat fox news&#8221;.</p>
<p>You clearly have not been following Larry Johnson&#8217;s antics or perhaps you caveat all of his other attempts at Obama-baiting as you do for this latest and lowest one. Larry Johnson (his wonderful resume notwithstanding) is one of the thugs in the Clinton mafia whose membership includes other notables such as Geraldine Ferraro, James Carville, Terry McCalledit etc. His not so subtle assignment has been to sabotage Obama with a rumor campaign. The non-existent tape in question is a good example. The question of whether such a tape exists or not becomes irrelevant when scholars such as yourself who offer themselves up as carriers of the following meme.</p>
<p>a. Michelle Obama has strong views. </p>
<p>b. Said views have tended to include strong words easily twisted, taken out of context (She said that white people are whaaaa &#8230;.)</p>
<p>c. Queue Larry Johnson with story of tape, keywords &#8220;michelle obama&#8221;, &#8220;whitey&#8221;</p>
<p>d. White america get ready to shit your pants.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not calling you any names (the r-word etc.) I&#8217;m just saying that you are either poorly informed, gullible and/or a patsy. I have a tape that says so.</p>
<p>To summarize: the point of a rumor campaign is the rumor itself. As Obama said in response (and as you somehow left out of your article):</p>
<p>â€œWe have seen this before. There is dirt and lies that are circulated in e-mails and they pump them out long enough until finally you, a mainstream reporter, asks me about it,â€ Obama said to the McClatchy reporter during a press conference aboard his campaign plane. â€œThat gives legs to the story. If somebody has evidence that myself or Michelle or anybody has said something inappropriate, let them do it.â€</p>
<p>And you just gave the story two more legs. Thanks Russ.</p>
<p>BREAKING: THE REAL WHITEY TAPE.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_6RXVs9_GI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_6RXVs9_GI</a></p>
<p>ps: you wind up your argument by citing a comment from LJ&#8217;s page. Come on man. I guess I beat up on you enough already so I&#8217;ll just say: &#8220;Homey, don&#8217;t play dat way&#8221;</p>
<p>pps: &#8220;Black Jesus&#8221; ???!!! WTF ??!! Being half-black isn&#8217;t a enough of a handicap (as in golf). Now he has to defend himself from accusations of being the son of god ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/06/08/larry-johnson-pariah-or-jeremiah/comment-page-1/#comment-42204</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2210#comment-42204</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Larry Johnson: Pariah or jeremiah?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Do we ignore his warnings about Michelleâ€™s â€œwhiteyâ€ tape at our own risk? Russ Wellen reports at Scholars &amp; Rogues....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Larry Johnson: Pariah or jeremiah?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Do we ignore his warnings about Michelleâ€™s â€œwhiteyâ€ tape at our own risk? Russ Wellen reports at Scholars &amp; Rogues&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
