<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fourth of July Quotabull</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:43:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Euphrosyne</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/comment-page-1/#comment-46011</link>
		<dc:creator>Euphrosyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2374#comment-46011</guid>
		<description>Brilliant. Just brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant. Just brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/comment-page-1/#comment-45934</link>
		<dc:creator>The Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2374#comment-45934</guid>
		<description>The greatest regulatory document in the history of the world is the U.S. Constitution...so, of course, the Republicans, as rabid deregulators, have been seeking to destroy it, along with all other regulations that might get in the way of their establishing a &quot;permanent Republican majority.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest regulatory document in the history of the world is the U.S. Constitution&#8230;so, of course, the Republicans, as rabid deregulators, have been seeking to destroy it, along with all other regulations that might get in the way of their establishing a &#8220;permanent Republican majority.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/comment-page-1/#comment-45919</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2374#comment-45919</guid>
		<description>If the Declaration of Independence and Constitution were introduced under comparable conditions today, the only congressperson who would vote for them is Dennis Kucinich. They would never fly with the public. It would think they&#039;re the work of latter-day Weathermen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Declaration of Independence and Constitution were introduced under comparable conditions today, the only congressperson who would vote for them is Dennis Kucinich. They would never fly with the public. It would think they&#8217;re the work of latter-day Weathermen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/comment-page-1/#comment-45824</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2374#comment-45824</guid>
		<description>One of your best QBs, Denny.  Thanks for slogging through all those signing statements.

Congress should outlaw signing statements.  But the President would just attach a signing statement saying he would interpret the limitations of the law on his authority according to the Constitution and would start ignoring laws without even saying what parts were being ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of your best QBs, Denny.  Thanks for slogging through all those signing statements.</p>
<p>Congress should outlaw signing statements.  But the President would just attach a signing statement saying he would interpret the limitations of the law on his authority according to the Constitution and would start ignoring laws without even saying what parts were being ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/07/03/a-fourth-of-july-quotabull/comment-page-1/#comment-45804</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=2374#comment-45804</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Fourth of July Quotabull...&lt;/strong&gt;

This week&#039;s Quotabull explores the words used by President Bush in his signing statements to impose a &quot;personal veto&quot; over laws he doesn&#039;t like....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Fourth of July Quotabull&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This week&#8217;s Quotabull explores the words used by President Bush in his signing statements to impose a &quot;personal veto&quot; over laws he doesn&#8217;t like&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
