<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:32:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Daxis, pt. 1: son of the Devil</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-55673</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Daxis, pt. 1: son of the Devil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-55673</guid>
		<description>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Daxis, pt. 2: Bangkok</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-55672</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Daxis, pt. 2: Bangkok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-55672</guid>
		<description>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; JonBenet, pt. 3: time to wake up, Professor Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54210</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; JonBenet, pt. 3: time to wake up, Professor Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54210</guid>
		<description>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Up next: Daxis</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54209</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Up next: Daxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54209</guid>
		<description>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; JonBenet, pt. 2: vile bigotry and voodoo stupidity</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54191</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; JonBenet, pt. 2: vile bigotry and voodoo stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54191</guid>
		<description>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikie</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54067</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54067</guid>
		<description>Although I agree strongly with Tracy about the media distortion of facts, I disagree with his conclusion that there is no evidence of prior abuse.  Just look closely at the photo posted in the Part 1 article, and you will see what I believe are stun marks on her leg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree strongly with Tracy about the media distortion of facts, I disagree with his conclusion that there is no evidence of prior abuse.  Just look closely at the photo posted in the Part 1 article, and you will see what I believe are stun marks on her leg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54066</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54066</guid>
		<description>It didn&#039;t look like he was trashing Mitch Morrisey in the paper, just pointing out that his theory was disregarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t look like he was trashing Mitch Morrisey in the paper, just pointing out that his theory was disregarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54053</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54053</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to add a few things here:

Let&#039;s not forget that Michael Tracey is the man who gave us John Mark Karr and a dozen other phony suspects. 

Tracey claims he looked for evidence that JonBenet was a victim of sexual abuse but found none. Isn&#039;t that interesting? Maybe he just didn&#039;t look hard enough. A whole slew of forensic pathologists and pediatricians, including, but not limited to, Drs. John McCann, David Jones, Ronald Wright and James Monteleone. Holly Smith is an investigator into child abuse cases. She&#039;s on their side, as well. As for JonBenet&#039;s pediatrician, he admits he never performed an internal exam to make sure.

Tracy claims Patsy had no predisposition to violence. As the FBI told the cops, &quot;that&#039;s a statistical argument, not evidence.&quot; It might mean something if this were premeditated murder, as Tracey seems to suggest. It most likely wasn&#039;t: it was an accidental killing with massive staging, an idea confirmed by said FBI.

Tracey claims the DA and Hall Haddon never met. But the DA&#039;s office, Bill Wise included, were part owners of a Boulder shopping mall.

Tracey trashes Mitch Morrisey, a prosecutor with a history of winning cases. How many has Tracey won? Yeah, that&#039;s what I thought.

Lastly, Tracey takes the approach of his American counterpart, Michael Moore by finding the craziest, hate-filled random statements he can find, then tarring everyone with the same brush. Well, as Edward G Robinson said, &quot;that don&#039;t go with me.&quot;

If Prof. Tracey wishes to debate me on this, he&#039;s welcome to name the time and place. I just hope he&#039;s wearing his cast-iron protective cup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add a few things here:</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget that Michael Tracey is the man who gave us John Mark Karr and a dozen other phony suspects. </p>
<p>Tracey claims he looked for evidence that JonBenet was a victim of sexual abuse but found none. Isn&#8217;t that interesting? Maybe he just didn&#8217;t look hard enough. A whole slew of forensic pathologists and pediatricians, including, but not limited to, Drs. John McCann, David Jones, Ronald Wright and James Monteleone. Holly Smith is an investigator into child abuse cases. She&#8217;s on their side, as well. As for JonBenet&#8217;s pediatrician, he admits he never performed an internal exam to make sure.</p>
<p>Tracy claims Patsy had no predisposition to violence. As the FBI told the cops, &#8220;that&#8217;s a statistical argument, not evidence.&#8221; It might mean something if this were premeditated murder, as Tracey seems to suggest. It most likely wasn&#8217;t: it was an accidental killing with massive staging, an idea confirmed by said FBI.</p>
<p>Tracey claims the DA and Hall Haddon never met. But the DA&#8217;s office, Bill Wise included, were part owners of a Boulder shopping mall.</p>
<p>Tracey trashes Mitch Morrisey, a prosecutor with a history of winning cases. How many has Tracey won? Yeah, that&#8217;s what I thought.</p>
<p>Lastly, Tracey takes the approach of his American counterpart, Michael Moore by finding the craziest, hate-filled random statements he can find, then tarring everyone with the same brush. Well, as Edward G Robinson said, &#8220;that don&#8217;t go with me.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Prof. Tracey wishes to debate me on this, he&#8217;s welcome to name the time and place. I just hope he&#8217;s wearing his cast-iron protective cup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-54000</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-54000</guid>
		<description>Brian, I just read your comment and thought I&#039;d add that I actually provided some research assistance on Tracey&#039;s first documentary, which interrogated the role of the media in establishing that &#039;of course the parents did it.&#039;  I came to the project assuming they probably were involved, but rather quickly came to recognize the amazing way in which those assumptions were shored up -- created for me, even -- by the deeply flawed media accounts that Tracey critiques.  My role as a researcher was to examine in detail several months&#039; worth of broadcast coverage (both TV &amp; radio) of the case, immediately after the crime and on into the spring and summer of 1996.  What was so fascinating was to engage all this in a compressed timespan (i.e., watching hours and hours of this stuff at once, rather than over time as it actually unfolded). In such a context it was easy to see the presumptions, the leaps of belief, the insistence on the parents&#039; guilt based not on rationality but on media suggestion and &#039;gut feelings.&#039;

When I first agreed to join the project, I met Dan Glick (then of Newsweek), with whom I would be working, in the kitchen at the Ramseys&#039; home.  I toured the house, including the so-called &#039;wine cellar&#039; where JonBenet&#039;s body was found.  It was so interesting later, as I was reviewing the media coverage, to hear a reporter from American Journal stand in front of the house there on 15th Street and refer to &quot;this maze of a house...with its secret room.&quot;  It was a large house, yes, but no &quot;maze,&quot; and the &quot;secret room&quot; was easily located with one right turn at the foot of the basement stairs.  It struck me as I watched this guy that he had never been in the house, yet he was speaking as if he had.  It was thus ludicrous to discover that the reporters interviewing the Ramseys&#039; housekeeper (Linda-somebody; I can&#039;t remember her last name) were buying her statements that she &quot;never knew of&quot; this hideaway.  If not, then she&#039;d simply never opened doors in the basement, as it was no hidden room.

That&#039;s just an anecdote, but it&#039;s indicative of the kind of reactions I had over and over to what the concerted research revealed.  Tracey has been vilified and pilloried on a multitude of fronts, but he for a long while was a mostly lone voice in a hostile wilderness on this case.  I think, despite the cognitive disconnect, that you will find reading his work to be intellectually very engaging, if not deeply troublesome.  It makes the open-minded reader really ponder how we &quot;know&quot; what we know. 

Incidentally, though I never met the Ramseys, JonBenet attended my kids&#039; elementary school and had attended the same preschool where we also knew a number of people, including the preschool director, who knew the family.  None of them -- well, none that I met, anyway -- believed for a second that Patsy Ramsey could have had any role whatsoever in the death of her daughter.  I, too, am totally turned off by the whole child pageant-thing, but these other parents confirmed that it was a sort of Southern-belle hobby that in Patsy&#039;s mind was cute and innocuous (this is not a perspective I hold, but I don&#039;t come out the pageant culture myself). The stories I heard of the Ramseys through personal connections were so very different from the picture of them painted in the vulture-like media accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I just read your comment and thought I&#8217;d add that I actually provided some research assistance on Tracey&#8217;s first documentary, which interrogated the role of the media in establishing that &#8216;of course the parents did it.&#8217;  I came to the project assuming they probably were involved, but rather quickly came to recognize the amazing way in which those assumptions were shored up &#8212; created for me, even &#8212; by the deeply flawed media accounts that Tracey critiques.  My role as a researcher was to examine in detail several months&#8217; worth of broadcast coverage (both TV &amp; radio) of the case, immediately after the crime and on into the spring and summer of 1996.  What was so fascinating was to engage all this in a compressed timespan (i.e., watching hours and hours of this stuff at once, rather than over time as it actually unfolded). In such a context it was easy to see the presumptions, the leaps of belief, the insistence on the parents&#8217; guilt based not on rationality but on media suggestion and &#8216;gut feelings.&#8217;</p>
<p>When I first agreed to join the project, I met Dan Glick (then of Newsweek), with whom I would be working, in the kitchen at the Ramseys&#8217; home.  I toured the house, including the so-called &#8216;wine cellar&#8217; where JonBenet&#8217;s body was found.  It was so interesting later, as I was reviewing the media coverage, to hear a reporter from American Journal stand in front of the house there on 15th Street and refer to &#8220;this maze of a house&#8230;with its secret room.&#8221;  It was a large house, yes, but no &#8220;maze,&#8221; and the &#8220;secret room&#8221; was easily located with one right turn at the foot of the basement stairs.  It struck me as I watched this guy that he had never been in the house, yet he was speaking as if he had.  It was thus ludicrous to discover that the reporters interviewing the Ramseys&#8217; housekeeper (Linda-somebody; I can&#8217;t remember her last name) were buying her statements that she &#8220;never knew of&#8221; this hideaway.  If not, then she&#8217;d simply never opened doors in the basement, as it was no hidden room.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just an anecdote, but it&#8217;s indicative of the kind of reactions I had over and over to what the concerted research revealed.  Tracey has been vilified and pilloried on a multitude of fronts, but he for a long while was a mostly lone voice in a hostile wilderness on this case.  I think, despite the cognitive disconnect, that you will find reading his work to be intellectually very engaging, if not deeply troublesome.  It makes the open-minded reader really ponder how we &#8220;know&#8221; what we know. </p>
<p>Incidentally, though I never met the Ramseys, JonBenet attended my kids&#8217; elementary school and had attended the same preschool where we also knew a number of people, including the preschool director, who knew the family.  None of them &#8212; well, none that I met, anyway &#8212; believed for a second that Patsy Ramsey could have had any role whatsoever in the death of her daughter.  I, too, am totally turned off by the whole child pageant-thing, but these other parents confirmed that it was a sort of Southern-belle hobby that in Patsy&#8217;s mind was cute and innocuous (this is not a perspective I hold, but I don&#8217;t come out the pageant culture myself). The stories I heard of the Ramseys through personal connections were so very different from the picture of them painted in the vulture-like media accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-53997</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-53997</guid>
		<description>Brian: the pageant thing bothered me then and it bothered me now, and I think it&#039;s important to separate some stuff. Nobody is really saying the Ramseys were saints on all fronts, and when (if) we finally get the whole truth on what really happened, I won&#039;t be the least bit surprised to learn that the pageants are how a pedophile found JonBenet in the first place. I won&#039;t speak for Michael here, but it&#039;s more than possible that the family&#039;s parenting choices set things in motion. Maybe, possibly, whatever.

However, that is NOT the point of the story. And I originally thought John had to be involved, too - for one thing, in cases like this it&#039;s often the father, and two, I &quot;knew&quot; a lot of things that turned out to be the horrific fictions. I&#039;ve said before that the Ramsey case is perhaps the worst example of journalistic malpractice in American history, and if I&#039;m wrong, I&#039;m not wrong by much.

So keep reading, and instead of battling the facts - and let me emphasize the word FACTS - think more about how badly you were lied to and ask yourself what else you&#039;ve been lied to about.

When I think about this case, the run-up to Iraq, the Cassie Bernall lie, and the Elian Gonzales circus, it&#039;s just about impossible for me to trust anything I get from the media anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: the pageant thing bothered me then and it bothered me now, and I think it&#8217;s important to separate some stuff. Nobody is really saying the Ramseys were saints on all fronts, and when (if) we finally get the whole truth on what really happened, I won&#8217;t be the least bit surprised to learn that the pageants are how a pedophile found JonBenet in the first place. I won&#8217;t speak for Michael here, but it&#8217;s more than possible that the family&#8217;s parenting choices set things in motion. Maybe, possibly, whatever.</p>
<p>However, that is NOT the point of the story. And I originally thought John had to be involved, too &#8211; for one thing, in cases like this it&#8217;s often the father, and two, I &#8220;knew&#8221; a lot of things that turned out to be the horrific fictions. I&#8217;ve said before that the Ramsey case is perhaps the worst example of journalistic malpractice in American history, and if I&#8217;m wrong, I&#8217;m not wrong by much.</p>
<p>So keep reading, and instead of battling the facts &#8211; and let me emphasize the word FACTS &#8211; think more about how badly you were lied to and ask yourself what else you&#8217;ve been lied to about.</p>
<p>When I think about this case, the run-up to Iraq, the Cassie Bernall lie, and the Elian Gonzales circus, it&#8217;s just about impossible for me to trust anything I get from the media anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-53995</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-53995</guid>
		<description>This has been interesting so far, Michael.  I&#039;m having to consciously force myself to read it because I&#039;m one of the people who &lt;strong&gt;knew&lt;/strong&gt; that the Ramsey&#039;s did it.  The child pageant thing colors my entire response to this case, and having children of my own has only strengthened my resolve against child pageants.  But as someone trying to be a part-time journalist myself, I have a far better understanding of all the failures you&#039;re describing than I did at the time.

I can&#039;t say I&#039;m looking forward to reading the rest of this series - the topic is too hard to read and cognitive dissonance isn&#039;t exactly fun - but I&#039;ll keep reading.  Thank you for writing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been interesting so far, Michael.  I&#8217;m having to consciously force myself to read it because I&#8217;m one of the people who <strong>knew</strong> that the Ramsey&#8217;s did it.  The child pageant thing colors my entire response to this case, and having children of my own has only strengthened my resolve against child pageants.  But as someone trying to be a part-time journalist myself, I have a far better understanding of all the failures you&#8217;re describing than I did at the time.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m looking forward to reading the rest of this series &#8211; the topic is too hard to read and cognitive dissonance isn&#8217;t exactly fun &#8211; but I&#8217;ll keep reading.  Thank you for writing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; From Christmas to August: Prologue</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/10/jonbenet-pt-1-the-establishment-of-a-narrative/comment-page-1/#comment-53985</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; From Christmas to August: Prologue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=4552#comment-53985</guid>
		<description>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative     Person Michael Tracy Right click for SmartMenu shortcuts    &#160;Print This Post   _qacct=&quot;p-157_wZdwZyET2&quot;;quantserve();       digg_url = &#039;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/08/from-christmas-to-august-prologue/&#039;; digg_title = &#039;From Christmas to August: Prologue&#039;; http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/08/from-christmas-to-august-prologue/        function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(&#039;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=&#039;+encodeURIComponent(u)+&#039;&amp;t=&#039;+encodeURIComponent(t),&#039;sharer&#039;,&#039;toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436&#039;);return false;}                  Copy this link for the trackback URL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JonBenet, pt. 1: the establishment of a narrative     Person Michael Tracy Right click for SmartMenu shortcuts    &nbsp;Print This Post   _qacct=&#8221;p-157_wZdwZyET2&#8243;;quantserve();       digg_url = &#8216;http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/08/from-christmas-to-august-prologue/&#8217;; digg_title = &#8216;From Christmas to August: Prologue&#8217;; <a href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/08/from-christmas-to-august-prologue/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/10/08/from-christmas-to-august-prologue/</a>        function fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open(&#8217;http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=&#8217;+encodeURIComponent(u)+&#8217;&#38;t=&#8217;+encodeURIComponent(t),&#8217;sharer&#8217;,'toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436&#8242;);return false;}                  Copy this link for the trackback URL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
