<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meanings, pt. 4: an awful, dark year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:32:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Talbot</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/comment-page-1/#comment-59022</link>
		<dc:creator>Talbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5366#comment-59022</guid>
		<description>Here, here Ms. Haze. 

The important comment for me, a request to be precise, is directed toward the owner of this blog. I respectfully ask you to consider removal of the mention of the child’s name in post 3 above. I don’t suppose I need to cite the numerous privacy or security reasons for such a request and would hope you accept this suggestion in the spirit in which it is intended, especially in light of the subject matter of this chapter of Dr. Tracey’s noble essay. Thanks for considering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, here Ms. Haze. </p>
<p>The important comment for me, a request to be precise, is directed toward the owner of this blog. I respectfully ask you to consider removal of the mention of the child’s name in post 3 above. I don’t suppose I need to cite the numerous privacy or security reasons for such a request and would hope you accept this suggestion in the spirit in which it is intended, especially in light of the subject matter of this chapter of Dr. Tracey’s noble essay. Thanks for considering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mshaze</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/comment-page-1/#comment-59013</link>
		<dc:creator>mshaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5366#comment-59013</guid>
		<description>if there is ever a question of the impetus, importance or reason for tracey to publish this piece it could not be better reflected than in the comments from case followers above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if there is ever a question of the impetus, importance or reason for tracey to publish this piece it could not be better reflected than in the comments from case followers above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/comment-page-1/#comment-58732</link>
		<dc:creator>jameson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5366#comment-58732</guid>
		<description>Oh - and for the record - I understand the engagement has been called off - Brooke&#039;s child may be safe from the man who claims he is a sadistic pedophile and murderer of JonBenet.  As innocent as he appears to be in this case, I am glad Natalie is no longer at risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh &#8211; and for the record &#8211; I understand the engagement has been called off &#8211; Brooke&#8217;s child may be safe from the man who claims he is a sadistic pedophile and murderer of JonBenet.  As innocent as he appears to be in this case, I am glad Natalie is no longer at risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/comment-page-1/#comment-58731</link>
		<dc:creator>jameson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5366#comment-58731</guid>
		<description>I was there on the day they buried Patsy Ramsey and I have to agree with you about how it seemed the officers were standing along the streets, not only guiding traffic but paying their respects, and yes, even acknowledging that the only thing that Patsy had ever done to JonBenet was love her.  You put it in words quite artfully.  ........................................................................................ 
The lynch mob didn&#039;t attend, their hate touched none of us that day.  It was a nice change.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  You are right about the BORG - to them hating is what oxygen is to the rest of us.  it gives them a reason to exist.  Pretty pathetic, if you ask me. **************************************  As for the women in your life and their &quot;war crimes tribunal&quot;, I will only say it made me smile and thanks for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there on the day they buried Patsy Ramsey and I have to agree with you about how it seemed the officers were standing along the streets, not only guiding traffic but paying their respects, and yes, even acknowledging that the only thing that Patsy had ever done to JonBenet was love her.  You put it in words quite artfully.  &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
The lynch mob didn&#8217;t attend, their hate touched none of us that day.  It was a nice change.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  You are right about the BORG &#8211; to them hating is what oxygen is to the rest of us.  it gives them a reason to exist.  Pretty pathetic, if you ask me. **************************************  As for the women in your life and their &#8220;war crimes tribunal&#8221;, I will only say it made me smile and thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koldkase</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/10/meanings-pt-4-an-awful-dark-year/comment-page-1/#comment-58418</link>
		<dc:creator>koldkase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5366#comment-58418</guid>
		<description>Michael, I actually feel sorry for you. With Karr, you looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked back. You have survived, but you have learned nothing, least of all to own your own disastrous contributions to the media circus accompanying the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. You&#039;re still thrashing about like a child in a tantrum because things just haven&#039;t gone the way you want, even demand. All your quoted sources can&#039;t change that you, Michael, are the true aggressor. This entire &quot;memoir&quot; is nothing more than one more attempt to attack and crush those who disagree with your personal conclusions on this case. You go so far as to take the very old Southern tradition of showing respect to the deceased in funeral processions and turn it into confirmation that Patsy Ramsey is not guilty, therefore you&#039;re right. That&#039;s quite a stretch, even for you, and speaking of consistent, is precisely indicative of your desperation to create any mythology around Patsy Ramsey that confirms your own. Now it&#039;s faux psychics. Who is your next media victim, Michael? To whom you will make no apologies when he turns out to be innocent, as well. Double standards; biases; creating the news rather than reporting it: you&#039;re a one man course in bad journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I actually feel sorry for you. With Karr, you looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked back. You have survived, but you have learned nothing, least of all to own your own disastrous contributions to the media circus accompanying the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. You&#8217;re still thrashing about like a child in a tantrum because things just haven&#8217;t gone the way you want, even demand. All your quoted sources can&#8217;t change that you, Michael, are the true aggressor. This entire &#8220;memoir&#8221; is nothing more than one more attempt to attack and crush those who disagree with your personal conclusions on this case. You go so far as to take the very old Southern tradition of showing respect to the deceased in funeral processions and turn it into confirmation that Patsy Ramsey is not guilty, therefore you&#8217;re right. That&#8217;s quite a stretch, even for you, and speaking of consistent, is precisely indicative of your desperation to create any mythology around Patsy Ramsey that confirms your own. Now it&#8217;s faux psychics. Who is your next media victim, Michael? To whom you will make no apologies when he turns out to be innocent, as well. Double standards; biases; creating the news rather than reporting it: you&#8217;re a one man course in bad journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
