<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama said to pick newly created &#8216;Leakmaster General&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/21/obama-said-to-pick-newly-created-leakmaster-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/21/obama-said-to-pick-newly-created-leakmaster-general/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:32:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Djerrid</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/21/obama-said-to-pick-newly-created-leakmaster-general/comment-page-1/#comment-58966</link>
		<dc:creator>Djerrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5555#comment-58966</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the inside scoop, Brad.

There are a couple of articles talking about the steady stream of cabinet leaks from the transition team. 

The first is from the Post  with the gist of &#039;After a long campaign of being leak-free, Washington finally showed some weak-spots in the armor.&#039;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/20/AR2008112001896.html?nav=hcmodule

Contrast this with David Brooks over at the Gray Lady who says &quot;The fact that they can already leak one big appointee per day is testimony to an awful lot of expert staff work.&quot;
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/opinion/21brooks.html

Having looked at the way Obama handles these things during the past couple of years, I see Brooks having the right idea about this. His team cranking out a new batch of freshly baked &#039;I&#039;m on top of it and I&#039;m working hard to fix this mess&#039; every day. He&#039;s keeping the spotlight on his transition with a consistent message of clear, smart choices that will surround him in the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the inside scoop, Brad.</p>
<p>There are a couple of articles talking about the steady stream of cabinet leaks from the transition team. </p>
<p>The first is from the Post  with the gist of &#8216;After a long campaign of being leak-free, Washington finally showed some weak-spots in the armor.&#8217;<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/20/AR2008112001896.html?nav=hcmodule" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/20/AR2008112001896.html?nav=hcmodule</a></p>
<p>Contrast this with David Brooks over at the Gray Lady who says &#8220;The fact that they can already leak one big appointee per day is testimony to an awful lot of expert staff work.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/opinion/21brooks.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/opinion/21brooks.html</a></p>
<p>Having looked at the way Obama handles these things during the past couple of years, I see Brooks having the right idea about this. His team cranking out a new batch of freshly baked &#8216;I&#8217;m on top of it and I&#8217;m working hard to fix this mess&#8217; every day. He&#8217;s keeping the spotlight on his transition with a consistent message of clear, smart choices that will surround him in the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/11/21/obama-said-to-pick-newly-created-leakmaster-general/comment-page-1/#comment-58959</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5555#comment-58959</guid>
		<description>Egad. This might actually be true ... Thanks, Brad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egad. This might actually be true &#8230; Thanks, Brad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
