They might not be manageable, but they’d probably be lethal

Unfortunately the “might not be manageable” is the operative phrase. Nisour Square is poster Massacre but a large part of the sort of mindset you get to when the most extreme RWA traits are reinforced to the detriment of actual professional thinking.

As to women serving, the WWII era Red Army provides a pretty good negative example for Lind’s argument…of course those were angry Russian women, and that’s the last thing anyone should want to tangle with.

This idea of forming a pure, Christian military is the silliest god-damned thing i’ve ever heard.

I can’t decide whether it’s terribly amusing or just plain sad that the only people I ever meet who complain about gays in the military are the ones who never seemed to put on a uniform, aside from a smattering of tired old Jesus-toting shitbags whose opinions are growing more obsolete every day.

During WWII, there were Japanese soldiers in the army, and it was difficult to integrate them into the troops, so they were put into Japanese battalion(s?).

Same went for Italians, Germans, and I f I recall correctly, orthodox Jews (imagine how confused the German army members where when they heard the Jewish troops speaking Yiddish. Yiddish is to the Germans kind of like what Shakespearean English is to us.

Imagine the uniforms and the stylized marching! On the other hand, enemy male troops might fight to the death before being taken prisoner by a gay company. The Village People didn’t have a prison guard, but I think you get the picture.

Imagine the enthusiasm an angry lesbian might feel toward male enemy soldiers…oh dear.

You want a good military person, find the one who is mailing a check home to his mom every pay day to cover bills.