<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photography: Solstice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:01:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Savantster</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59867</link>
		<dc:creator>Savantster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59867</guid>
		<description>Dawn, don&#039;t let &quot;size&quot; fool you (re: jeff).. I had a 36&quot; monitor for a long time, it sat next to my 30&quot; TV and I would play games while watching TV with them side by side. The resolution (way back when) on the &quot;big screen&quot; was only 800x600.

Even modern plasma/LCD TVs (acting as monitors) don&#039;t normally have all that high of resolution. I have a 24&quot; wide screen LCD monitor (real monitor, not a TV that also acts as one), and that&#039;s only 1680x1050. 2048x1536 is plenty resolved for 99% of the applications out there, and making it bigger will just increase file size with no real benefit.

and I agree, that&#039;s a very fine picture for desktop wallpaper :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn, don&#8217;t let &#8220;size&#8221; fool you (re: jeff).. I had a 36&#8243; monitor for a long time, it sat next to my 30&#8243; TV and I would play games while watching TV with them side by side. The resolution (way back when) on the &#8220;big screen&#8221; was only 800&#215;600.</p>
<p>Even modern plasma/LCD TVs (acting as monitors) don&#8217;t normally have all that high of resolution. I have a 24&#8243; wide screen LCD monitor (real monitor, not a TV that also acts as one), and that&#8217;s only 1680&#215;1050. 2048&#215;1536 is plenty resolved for 99% of the applications out there, and making it bigger will just increase file size with no real benefit.</p>
<p>and I agree, that&#8217;s a very fine picture for desktop wallpaper <img src='http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59866</link>
		<dc:creator>elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59866</guid>
		<description>No thanks required ~ just keep posting. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks required ~ just keep posting. <img src='http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59863</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59863</guid>
		<description>Dr. S - I shall use that privilege judiciously...

Elaine - thanks love</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. S &#8211; I shall use that privilege judiciously&#8230;</p>
<p>Elaine &#8211; thanks love</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59858</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59858</guid>
		<description>:)

*hearts Dawn*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>*hearts Dawn*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59843</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59843</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t recall anybody limiting you to one photo a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall anybody limiting you to one photo a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWMackowski</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59839</link>
		<dc:creator>CWMackowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59839</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous (as always)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous (as always)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59838</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59838</guid>
		<description>Jeff - I shall have to confess that until S&amp;R asked me to post a weekly photograph, I simply took pictures for my own amusement.  While I do have a horizontal version of this shot, the highest resolution I have is 2048x1536.  I do not think it would work for your 32&quot; monitor.  But thank you for asking.

I made a decision some time ago to stick with the point and shoot model.  I have a Nikon CoolPik L5.  I love it - portable and easy to use.  The camera can take much finer resolution up to 3072x2304.  Future photographs perhaps!

Russ:  I&#039;m glad you stopped to look.  When I first saw the rope swing I could almost hear the voices of children laughing as they dropped into the water below.  It was late June when I took that, so summer was over in Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; I shall have to confess that until S&amp;R asked me to post a weekly photograph, I simply took pictures for my own amusement.  While I do have a horizontal version of this shot, the highest resolution I have is 2048&#215;1536.  I do not think it would work for your 32&#8243; monitor.  But thank you for asking.</p>
<p>I made a decision some time ago to stick with the point and shoot model.  I have a Nikon CoolPik L5.  I love it &#8211; portable and easy to use.  The camera can take much finer resolution up to 3072&#215;2304.  Future photographs perhaps!</p>
<p>Russ:  I&#8217;m glad you stopped to look.  When I first saw the rope swing I could almost hear the voices of children laughing as they dropped into the water below.  It was late June when I took that, so summer was over in Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff watson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59828</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59828</guid>
		<description>Dawn,

Would you post a high resolution version of this wonderful picture so we can all enjoy it.  Frankly, I&#039;d like a high res version to use as wallpaper on my main 32&quot; monitor.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn,</p>
<p>Would you post a high resolution version of this wonderful picture so we can all enjoy it.  Frankly, I&#8217;d like a high res version to use as wallpaper on my main 32&#8243; monitor.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59825</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59825</guid>
		<description>Extraordinary. Also, parceling out one picture at a time both induces us to concentrate on the moment captured and leaves us hanging for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extraordinary. Also, parceling out one picture at a time both induces us to concentrate on the moment captured and leaves us hanging for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59822</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59822</guid>
		<description>Dr. Slammy and Lex - thanks for the comments!  To answer your question - I took this photo at the Solitary Islands Marine Park in Wooli, Australia.  It is on the border between Queensland and New South Wales.

It is a working camper van site.  The people living there go fishing daily.  I wish the photo could have also captured the soft sounds of the boats stirring and life beginning for the morning.  It is a remarkable place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Slammy and Lex &#8211; thanks for the comments!  To answer your question &#8211; I took this photo at the Solitary Islands Marine Park in Wooli, Australia.  It is on the border between Queensland and New South Wales.</p>
<p>It is a working camper van site.  The people living there go fishing daily.  I wish the photo could have also captured the soft sounds of the boats stirring and life beginning for the morning.  It is a remarkable place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59820</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59820</guid>
		<description>Love it: simultaneously stark and soft.  The fraying rope of man&#039;s imprint divides - without conquering - the mist, shadow, and reflection of Nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it: simultaneously stark and soft.  The fraying rope of man&#8217;s imprint divides &#8211; without conquering &#8211; the mist, shadow, and reflection of Nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/17/photography-solstice/comment-page-1/#comment-59819</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=5978#comment-59819</guid>
		<description>Dawn, this is gorgeous. Where did you shoot this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn, this is gorgeous. Where did you shoot this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
