<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Lord Baby Jesus, we come before you today to inaugurate the new president of the United States of God&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Giveth And Obama Taketh Away &#187; Boztopia.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59887</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Giveth And Obama Taketh Away &#187; Boztopia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59887</guid>
		<description>[...] one BIG down, one BIG up, and one head-scratcher in the middle. If, as Bonesparkle says, this may be just a case of &#8220;Use &#8216;em and lose &#8216;em,&#8221; I can hold my nose and live with Warren sleazing it up at the inauguration if it gets us the EFCA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one BIG down, one BIG up, and one head-scratcher in the middle. If, as Bonesparkle says, this may be just a case of &#8220;Use &#8216;em and lose &#8216;em,&#8221; I can hold my nose and live with Warren sleazing it up at the inauguration if it gets us the EFCA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59886</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59886</guid>
		<description>I like Option 4 as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Option 4 as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Ivins</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Ivins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59884</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping for #4, because it&#039;s so sneaky and smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping for #4, because it&#8217;s so sneaky and smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59880</guid>
		<description>That &quot;pissing out of the tent instead of pissing in&quot; metaphor comes to mind. I&#039;m inclined to think it&#039;s a purely political move.

Let&#039;s assume Obama sticks with the agenda he layed out earlier. Some time down the line, he would draw ire from the evangelical crowd and Warren for supporting any number of social measures, at which point he could say to Warren, &quot;You swore me in, you accepted my invitation. Perhaps you should have stuck by your principles.&quot; Suddenly Obama as the snake is forgotten and Warren is remembered as the one who was tempted, and those who are tempted are not leadership material in evangelical circles. Obama is making Warren invest in his success, and should Obama stray from the strictures of evangelism, he&#039;s going to use Warren as a fall-guy. Warren&#039;s only option for survival is to then change the evangelical community into moderates.

Far-fetched, but possible. Either that, or it&#039;s option 1 and 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8220;pissing out of the tent instead of pissing in&#8221; metaphor comes to mind. I&#8217;m inclined to think it&#8217;s a purely political move.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume Obama sticks with the agenda he layed out earlier. Some time down the line, he would draw ire from the evangelical crowd and Warren for supporting any number of social measures, at which point he could say to Warren, &#8220;You swore me in, you accepted my invitation. Perhaps you should have stuck by your principles.&#8221; Suddenly Obama as the snake is forgotten and Warren is remembered as the one who was tempted, and those who are tempted are not leadership material in evangelical circles. Obama is making Warren invest in his success, and should Obama stray from the strictures of evangelism, he&#8217;s going to use Warren as a fall-guy. Warren&#8217;s only option for survival is to then change the evangelical community into moderates.</p>
<p>Far-fetched, but possible. Either that, or it&#8217;s option 1 and 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JThompson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59879</link>
		<dc:creator>JThompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59879</guid>
		<description>Angering the very people that got you elected isn&#039;t a terribly wise political move no matter how much you want to be a man of all the people all the time.
Especially pissing them off before you&#039;ve even been sworn in.
If *just* the rationalists and homosexuals don&#039;t vote for him next time, he&#039;ll lose by a large margin. The religious right isn&#039;t going to vote for him no matter what he does.
So if this sets the tone for his administration, he probably shouldn&#039;t get too comfortable in the oval office.

That&#039;s not to say I hate the man or something. I just don&#039;t think this bodes well. He&#039;s going to have to be that much better once he&#039;s in there to convince us he should get a second term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angering the very people that got you elected isn&#8217;t a terribly wise political move no matter how much you want to be a man of all the people all the time.<br />
Especially pissing them off before you&#8217;ve even been sworn in.<br />
If *just* the rationalists and homosexuals don&#8217;t vote for him next time, he&#8217;ll lose by a large margin. The religious right isn&#8217;t going to vote for him no matter what he does.<br />
So if this sets the tone for his administration, he probably shouldn&#8217;t get too comfortable in the oval office.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say I hate the man or something. I just don&#8217;t think this bodes well. He&#8217;s going to have to be that much better once he&#8217;s in there to convince us he should get a second term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59868</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59868</guid>
		<description>Of all the interesting religious/spiritual people who might have done it, this jackass gets picked.  That&#039;s not change, that&#039;s more of the same.

There&#039;s nothing Christian about Warren and his cohort; in fact, they&#039;d be the ones gleefully nailing Him to the cross if Christ returned in any manner short of riding a cloud and dishing out celestial vengeance to all that isn&#039;t Old Testament righteous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the interesting religious/spiritual people who might have done it, this jackass gets picked.  That&#8217;s not change, that&#8217;s more of the same.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing Christian about Warren and his cohort; in fact, they&#8217;d be the ones gleefully nailing Him to the cross if Christ returned in any manner short of riding a cloud and dishing out celestial vengeance to all that isn&#8217;t Old Testament righteous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby McGill</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2008/12/18/dear-lord-baby-jesus-we-come-before-you-today-to-inaugurate-the-new-president-of-the-united-states-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-59864</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby McGill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6079#comment-59864</guid>
		<description>Definitely the wise political move. Obama is creeping lightly into the White House trying to keep everyone happy. I don&#039;t mind Warren doing the swearing in. It is an old tradition and I am alright with that. 

But as wrote in my blog a while back, when Warren gets a televised sit down with both candidates during an election year I find myself wishing for lightning to strike down from the heavens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely the wise political move. Obama is creeping lightly into the White House trying to keep everyone happy. I don&#8217;t mind Warren doing the swearing in. It is an old tradition and I am alright with that. </p>
<p>But as wrote in my blog a while back, when Warren gets a televised sit down with both candidates during an election year I find myself wishing for lightning to strike down from the heavens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

