<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Orcs by Stan Nicholls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:16:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasamba</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-91552</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasamba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-91552</guid>
		<description>i was actually pretty cool with the book in general - as I was after some mindless escapism, which I got in spades. My big gripe is that the ending was like whaaaa? It was a pity to end a pretty darn entertaining series with a weird bunch of events that felt like I was starting the book again. But the fighting scenes were sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was actually pretty cool with the book in general &#8211; as I was after some mindless escapism, which I got in spades. My big gripe is that the ending was like whaaaa? It was a pity to end a pretty darn entertaining series with a weird bunch of events that felt like I was starting the book again. But the fighting scenes were sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badtz</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-69238</link>
		<dc:creator>badtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-69238</guid>
		<description>While the Covenant books are pretty amazing, because the main charecter is such an... unsavory individual the impact isnt the same, the series is more cerebral about the man himself.  The best fantasy series I&#039;ve read any time recently that might be on the level of LOTR is the song of ice and fire series by George R.R. Martin.  Its been painful waiting for the books (the first one came out in 96, and there have been wait times of years between books) but they are what Id consider so epic that so far it has been worth the wait.  They differ on various levels from the LOTR series, but like LOTR they are a series of books I&#039;ll pick up and reread every few years, which for me is extremely rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the Covenant books are pretty amazing, because the main charecter is such an&#8230; unsavory individual the impact isnt the same, the series is more cerebral about the man himself.  The best fantasy series I&#8217;ve read any time recently that might be on the level of LOTR is the song of ice and fire series by George R.R. Martin.  Its been painful waiting for the books (the first one came out in 96, and there have been wait times of years between books) but they are what Id consider so epic that so far it has been worth the wait.  They differ on various levels from the LOTR series, but like LOTR they are a series of books I&#8217;ll pick up and reread every few years, which for me is extremely rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWMackowski</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60388</link>
		<dc:creator>CWMackowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60388</guid>
		<description>I thought Herbert&#039;s Dune series had a pretty well-developed world, although I agree with Sam that there got to be far too much navel gazing. On a somewhat different note, I thought Richard Adams did a pretty successful job creating a world with Watership Down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Herbert&#8217;s Dune series had a pretty well-developed world, although I agree with Sam that there got to be far too much navel gazing. On a somewhat different note, I thought Richard Adams did a pretty successful job creating a world with Watership Down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60382</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60382</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, since that&#039;s what I was talking about too.

There is a lot of depth to Middle Earth that isn&#039;t scratched in the four main novels, while there&#039;s less depth that&#039;s better explored in the first 3 Dune novels (IMO).

I&#039;ve had people tell me that the &lt;em&gt;Chronicles of Thomas Covenant&lt;/em&gt; are deep like Tolkien, but as I&#039;ve never read the novels, I can&#039;t say.  When I&#039;m writing my own stories, though, I spend a LOT of time creating the world, and that&#039;s probably because I&#039;ve loved deep and rich settings for the books I&#039;ve read.  I&#039;ll never try to create my own language, however.  Some things you need to be an expert to pull off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, since that&#8217;s what I was talking about too.</p>
<p>There is a lot of depth to Middle Earth that isn&#8217;t scratched in the four main novels, while there&#8217;s less depth that&#8217;s better explored in the first 3 Dune novels (IMO).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had people tell me that the <em>Chronicles of Thomas Covenant</em> are deep like Tolkien, but as I&#8217;ve never read the novels, I can&#8217;t say.  When I&#8217;m writing my own stories, though, I spend a LOT of time creating the world, and that&#8217;s probably because I&#8217;ve loved deep and rich settings for the books I&#8217;ve read.  I&#8217;ll never try to create my own language, however.  Some things you need to be an expert to pull off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60381</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60381</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m talking about the trilogy + &lt;em&gt;The Hobbit&lt;/em&gt;, pretty much. The rest of the stuff was tedious, I agree. Although I&#039;d argue a fine point - that tediousness was more about the writing, as opposed to Herbert, where the navel-gazing sort of BECAME the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m talking about the trilogy + <em>The Hobbit</em>, pretty much. The rest of the stuff was tedious, I agree. Although I&#8217;d argue a fine point &#8211; that tediousness was more about the writing, as opposed to Herbert, where the navel-gazing sort of BECAME the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60377</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60377</guid>
		<description>I agree that the hard SF folks aren&#039;t generally about building deep worlds.  I&#039;m not a hard SF guy in general - I&#039;d rather read a great story than one that&#039;s strictly real, and too many of the hard SF writers are, as you say, more interested in reality than in a good story.  Gregory Benford is one of those - his world is strictly hard, and some of his work is great (Across the Sea of Stars, Great Sky River for example), but when he focused too much on the physics and let the world and characterization fade in his later Galactic Center novels, I lost interest.

As for the universe of Dune, are you comparing Tolkien&#039;s entire world (a la the later novels like the Silmarilian) to the entire body of Dune, or are you comparing the first 2-3 novels in the Dune series to the LotR?  Because the Silmarilian and it&#039;s like are flat-out unreadable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the hard SF folks aren&#8217;t generally about building deep worlds.  I&#8217;m not a hard SF guy in general &#8211; I&#8217;d rather read a great story than one that&#8217;s strictly real, and too many of the hard SF writers are, as you say, more interested in reality than in a good story.  Gregory Benford is one of those &#8211; his world is strictly hard, and some of his work is great (Across the Sea of Stars, Great Sky River for example), but when he focused too much on the physics and let the world and characterization fade in his later Galactic Center novels, I lost interest.</p>
<p>As for the universe of Dune, are you comparing Tolkien&#8217;s entire world (a la the later novels like the Silmarilian) to the entire body of Dune, or are you comparing the first 2-3 novels in the Dune series to the LotR?  Because the Silmarilian and it&#8217;s like are flat-out unreadable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Slammy</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60375</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Slammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60375</guid>
		<description>Brian, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but there aren&#039;t any fantasy universes I&#039;ve come across that match Tolkien&#039;s. &lt;em&gt;Dune&lt;/em&gt; started well, but after a couple books devolved into obscure political philosphy navel-gazing. The hard SF folks were more about trying to imagine technical plausibility than they were living, breathing, organic cultures. This is why cyberpunk was so vital when it came along in the &#039;80s.

Donaldson&#039;s White Gold Wielder world wasn&#039;t bad, but it was hardly up to Tolkien&#039;s standards.

Although I should add that few writers have ever match Rand for sheer fantasy of vision....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but there aren&#8217;t any fantasy universes I&#8217;ve come across that match Tolkien&#8217;s. <em>Dune</em> started well, but after a couple books devolved into obscure political philosphy navel-gazing. The hard SF folks were more about trying to imagine technical plausibility than they were living, breathing, organic cultures. This is why cyberpunk was so vital when it came along in the &#8217;80s.</p>
<p>Donaldson&#8217;s White Gold Wielder world wasn&#8217;t bad, but it was hardly up to Tolkien&#8217;s standards.</p>
<p>Although I should add that few writers have ever match Rand for sheer fantasy of vision&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60372</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60372</guid>
		<description>There a number of universes outside fantasy that equal Tolkien&#039;s own.  The galaxy of Asimov&#039;s Foundation and Robots novels comes to mind, as does the Empire of Herbert&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Dune&lt;/em&gt;.

But it depends on what you&#039;re reading for, too.  Tolkien lovers love the world - the plot is exciting, but pretty standard adventure fare these days, and his characterization is kinda flat in many ways.  I reread LotR for Middle Earth, not for following how Frodo, Gandalf, et al. develop as characters from the beginning to the end.  If I want that, I don&#039;t read Tolkien, I read Stephan R. Donaldson (the Gap series, since I haven&#039;t read his fantasy stuff) or Kim Stanley Robinson or Asimov.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There a number of universes outside fantasy that equal Tolkien&#8217;s own.  The galaxy of Asimov&#8217;s Foundation and Robots novels comes to mind, as does the Empire of Herbert&#8217;s <em>Dune</em>.</p>
<p>But it depends on what you&#8217;re reading for, too.  Tolkien lovers love the world &#8211; the plot is exciting, but pretty standard adventure fare these days, and his characterization is kinda flat in many ways.  I reread LotR for Middle Earth, not for following how Frodo, Gandalf, et al. develop as characters from the beginning to the end.  If I want that, I don&#8217;t read Tolkien, I read Stephan R. Donaldson (the Gap series, since I haven&#8217;t read his fantasy stuff) or Kim Stanley Robinson or Asimov.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWMackowski</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60361</link>
		<dc:creator>CWMackowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60361</guid>
		<description>Russ --

These are not LotR orcs. Different fantasy world altogether. As Lex suggested, I, like a lot of others, tend to use LotR for comparison purposes, and that might not be entirely fair.

-- C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ &#8211;</p>
<p>These are not LotR orcs. Different fantasy world altogether. As Lex suggested, I, like a lot of others, tend to use LotR for comparison purposes, and that might not be entirely fair.</p>
<p>&#8211; C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60356</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60356</guid>
		<description>Now these are the Orcs from the Ring and Tokien, right? I was looking at Amazon and none of the publishers&#039; or readers&#039; reviews make that entirely clear.

If so, that&#039;s almost 800 pages of bad teeth and even worse hygiene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now these are the Orcs from the Ring and Tokien, right? I was looking at Amazon and none of the publishers&#8217; or readers&#8217; reviews make that entirely clear.</p>
<p>If so, that&#8217;s almost 800 pages of bad teeth and even worse hygiene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/04/review-orcs-by-stan-nicholls/comment-page-1/#comment-60355</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6439#comment-60355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fantasy genre reader, but i wonder if &lt;i&gt;Lord of the Rings&lt;/i&gt; set the bar too high for any other author to ever get over it again.

If i understand the history of &lt;i&gt;LotR&lt;/i&gt; correctly, Tolkien didn&#039;t really set out to write the story so much as the story grew around his hobby of inventing languages.  That all the languages are fully functioning lends a depth to the story...even if you don&#039;t bother learning the languages.  And i would imagine that the attention to language went hand in hand with his attention developing the myths/stories of the individual groups within &lt;i&gt;LotR&lt;/i&gt;.  Which led to the world he created being so deep that it takes very little suspension of disbelief; it feels real because it is real...if imaginary.

And writing wasn&#039;t even his day job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fantasy genre reader, but i wonder if <i>Lord of the Rings</i> set the bar too high for any other author to ever get over it again.</p>
<p>If i understand the history of <i>LotR</i> correctly, Tolkien didn&#8217;t really set out to write the story so much as the story grew around his hobby of inventing languages.  That all the languages are fully functioning lends a depth to the story&#8230;even if you don&#8217;t bother learning the languages.  And i would imagine that the attention to language went hand in hand with his attention developing the myths/stories of the individual groups within <i>LotR</i>.  Which led to the world he created being so deep that it takes very little suspension of disbelief; it feels real because it is real&#8230;if imaginary.</p>
<p>And writing wasn&#8217;t even his day job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

