<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACCCE&#8217;s &#8220;72% of opinion leaders&#8221; claim is unsupported bunk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/</link>
	<description>Think.  It ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars and Rogues &#187; Industry vs. scientists &#8211; who profits from climate disruption?</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-79255</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Industry vs. scientists &#8211; who profits from climate disruption?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-79255</guid>
		<description>[...] actually were. So long as the industries&#8217; opposition to climate disruption legislation via advertising, lobbying, media outreach, litigation, and FUD-focused think tanks cost less than $70 billion, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] actually were. So long as the industries&#8217; opposition to climate disruption legislation via advertising, lobbying, media outreach, litigation, and FUD-focused think tanks cost less than $70 billion, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff watson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65920</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65920</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Actually, the energy complex is on its way up as the economy recovers, and despite what the pundits say, it is recovering, and recovering nicely.  Media caused scares that result in recession usually recovery nicely when the buyers see the values out there. still, a recession is a good thing as it wrings out the irrational exuberance and allows everything to find its proper value. 

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Actually, the energy complex is on its way up as the economy recovers, and despite what the pundits say, it is recovering, and recovering nicely.  Media caused scares that result in recession usually recovery nicely when the buyers see the values out there. still, a recession is a good thing as it wrings out the irrational exuberance and allows everything to find its proper value. </p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Angliss</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65919</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Angliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65919</guid>
		<description>These days energy is a good buy.  Oil&#039;s down, coal&#039;s down, I think most non-precious metals are down because the global economy is down.  If you believe that the economy will recover, then the adage &quot;buy low, sell high&quot; applies quite well.

About the only way fossil energy prices won&#039;t go back up that I can see is if a) the economy doesn&#039;t ever recover (unlikely) and/or b) some magician snaps his/her fingers and all fossil fuels are instantaneously replaced by non-fossil fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days energy is a good buy.  Oil&#8217;s down, coal&#8217;s down, I think most non-precious metals are down because the global economy is down.  If you believe that the economy will recover, then the adage &#8220;buy low, sell high&#8221; applies quite well.</p>
<p>About the only way fossil energy prices won&#8217;t go back up that I can see is if a) the economy doesn&#8217;t ever recover (unlikely) and/or b) some magician snaps his/her fingers and all fossil fuels are instantaneously replaced by non-fossil fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65908</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65908</guid>
		<description>Coal went from 134.60 a ton at the height of the bubble to 36.40 as of today&#039;s closing price.  Looks like a good long to me as the chart screams buy, buy, buy.  Thanks for the tip.  I think I will fade the authors and buy some coal.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal went from 134.60 a ton at the height of the bubble to 36.40 as of today&#8217;s closing price.  Looks like a good long to me as the chart screams buy, buy, buy.  Thanks for the tip.  I think I will fade the authors and buy some coal.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65902</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65902</guid>
		<description>[...] Angliss over at Scholars and Rogues tears the ACCCE claim apart, revealing how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Angliss over at Scholars and Rogues tears the ACCCE claim apart, revealing how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACCCEâs Wild and Crazy Advertising Claims Debunked &#124; FollowGreen.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65901</link>
		<dc:creator>ACCCEâs Wild and Crazy Advertising Claims Debunked &#124; FollowGreen.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65901</guid>
		<description>[...] claims that &#8220;72% of opinion leaders support coal electricity.&#8221;Brian Angliss over at Scholars and Rogues tears the ACCCE claim apart, revealing how the coal industry&#8217;s favorite front group is cooking up some crazy statistics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] claims that &ldquo;72% of opinion leaders support coal electricity.&rdquo;Brian Angliss over at Scholars and Rogues tears the ACCCE claim apart, revealing how the coal industry&rsquo;s favorite front group is cooking up some crazy statistics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Penny Sheet &#187; Scholars and Rogues » ACCCE’s “72% of opinion leaders” claim is unsupported bunk</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65865</link>
		<dc:creator>One Penny Sheet &#187; Scholars and Rogues » ACCCE’s “72% of opinion leaders” claim is unsupported bunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65865</guid>
		<description>[...] via Scholars and Rogues » ACCCE’s “72% of opinion leaders” claim is unsupported bunk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Scholars and Rogues » ACCCE’s “72% of opinion leaders” claim is unsupported bunk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65861</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65861</guid>
		<description>Shocked! Shocked I am that a spurious statistic would be used to validate a political position!

Thanks, Brian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shocked! Shocked I am that a spurious statistic would be used to validate a political position!</p>
<p>Thanks, Brian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Wellen</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/08/accce-claim-is-bunk/comment-page-1/#comment-65859</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Wellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 12:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9070#comment-65859</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Brian. These people are desperate to keep coal alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Brian. These people are desperate to keep coal alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

