<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not just hawks who question whether nuclear power is an &#8216;inalienable right&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/15/its-not-just-hawks-who-question-whether-nuclear-power-is-an-inalienable-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/15/its-not-just-hawks-who-question-whether-nuclear-power-is-an-inalienable-right/</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:38:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Konstantin</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/15/its-not-just-hawks-who-question-whether-nuclear-power-is-an-inalienable-right/comment-page-1/#comment-68858</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=10273#comment-68858</guid>
		<description>One more thing if you actually believe that civilian nuclear power plants are responsible for proliferation, well I was going to make a comment insulting your intelligence or lack thereof, but I just suggest a link to enlighten you

&lt;a href=&quot;http://knol.google.com/k/alexander-devolpi/nuclear-weapons-proliferation-a/1gsyt5k142kc5/3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROLIFERATION: A Technical Perspective&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing if you actually believe that civilian nuclear power plants are responsible for proliferation, well I was going to make a comment insulting your intelligence or lack thereof, but I just suggest a link to enlighten you</p>
<p><a href="http://knol.google.com/k/alexander-devolpi/nuclear-weapons-proliferation-a/1gsyt5k142kc5/3" rel="nofollow">NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROLIFERATION: A Technical Perspective</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantin</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/15/its-not-just-hawks-who-question-whether-nuclear-power-is-an-inalienable-right/comment-page-1/#comment-68856</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=10273#comment-68856</guid>
		<description>That fuel bank is a BS idea. Just like the world today is at the mercy and dependant on a few oil producing countries you are advocating handing control of the hope and future of the human race to a few psychopaths who decide who gets to live (by giving them energy) and who dies (by withholding energy). Haven&#039;t you learned the people in the nations of the world are not the enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That fuel bank is a BS idea. Just like the world today is at the mercy and dependant on a few oil producing countries you are advocating handing control of the hope and future of the human race to a few psychopaths who decide who gets to live (by giving them energy) and who dies (by withholding energy). Haven&#8217;t you learned the people in the nations of the world are not the enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff watson</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/15/its-not-just-hawks-who-question-whether-nuclear-power-is-an-inalienable-right/comment-page-1/#comment-68843</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=10273#comment-68843</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that the phrase, &quot;(Even easier pickings for hawks are those progressives willing to concede Iran the bomb. Nukes, goes the argument, have a way of turning erratic states into rational actors.)&quot; isn&#039;t your argument as North Korea couldn&#039;t be considered to be exhibiting rational behavior.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that the phrase, &#8220;(Even easier pickings for hawks are those progressives willing to concede Iran the bomb. Nukes, goes the argument, have a way of turning erratic states into rational actors.)&#8221; isn&#8217;t your argument as North Korea couldn&#8217;t be considered to be exhibiting rational behavior.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
