Comments on: Two very different climate disruption messages

By: tonsure wimple

tonsure wimple — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:36:59 +0000

B.A., you don’t have an email I can find. Have you ever posted this:

http://www.theage.com.au/national/a-farmers-field-of-dreams-buries-climate-change-war-20091031-hqty.html
BioAgtive Technologies
http://www.bioagtive.com/?s=1&p=141

By: Brad

Brad — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:14:26 +0000

Neither! The “Moms against climate change” meme is ironic, given that climate change is the latest in a growing series of ecological disasters that is largely the result of the exploding human population. Supermodels disrobing (BTW, don’t they almost look like normal humans when they wear 6 layers?) is pointless and just trivializes the issue.

By: “If our children knew the facts …” Demonstration

“If our children knew the facts …” Demonstration — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:16:39 +0000

[...] tip to Brian at Scholars & Rogues who balanced this video with that of models stripping for the climate. Share and [...]

By: DavidCOG

DavidCOG — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:15:42 +0000

First one, easy.

That’s not to say something with an uplifting message wouldn’t work better – but “act and you can see some skinny models take their underwear off” is pretty dumb. It’s the internet – I can see all the naked women I want! I don’t know who that’s supposed to appeal to. 14-year old boys?

By: greenfyre

greenfyre — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:30:13 +0000

First one, hands down. The latter has appeal to a straight male, but really it’s not about me doing anything, just enjoying the thought.

That being said, I suggest a better test would be one about a bright future vs dark future. This example is way too apples vs oranges.

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:27:32 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by ClimaTweets: [ScholarsAndRogues] Two very different climate disruption messages: Most people view climate.. http://bit.ly/49gPm2...