<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scholars and Rogues &#187; Brad Jacobson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/author/brad-jacobson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com</link>
	<description>Think - it ain&#039;t illegal yet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Exclusive: How corporations secretly move millions to fund political ads</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/02/04/exclusive-how-corporations-secretly-move-millions-to-fund-political-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/02/04/exclusive-how-corporations-secretly-move-millions-to-fund-political-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chamber of commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate money laundering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[express advocacy ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade associations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=14684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court’s seismic January ruling that corporations are free to spend unlimited amounts of their profits to advertise for or against candidates may have been the latest shakeup of campaign finance – but gaping holes already allow corporations to spend enormous sums without leaving a paper trail, a Raw Story investigation has found.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/02/04/exclusive-how-corporations-secretly-move-millions-to-fund-political-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Whistleblower reveals how insurers can game healthcare bill</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/20/exclusive-whistleblower-reveals-how-insurers-can-game-healthcare-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/20/exclusive-whistleblower-reveals-how-insurers-can-game-healthcare-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-deductible plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical-loss ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-pocket costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendell Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=14399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wendell Potter, a twenty-year veteran of the insurance industry and former vice president of communications for Cigna, warns that current healthcare legislation does nothing to prevent the insurance industry from continuing its ongoing practice of increasingly shifting healthcare costs to consumers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/20/exclusive-whistleblower-reveals-how-insurers-can-game-healthcare-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXCLUSIVE: Obama received $20 million of healthcare Industry money in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/12/exclusive-obama-received-20-million-of-healthcare-industry-money-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/12/exclusive-obama-received-20-million-of-healthcare-industry-money-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Responsive Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special interests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=14146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While some sunlight has been shed on the hefty sums shoveled into congressional campaign coffers in an effort to influence the Democrats' massive healthcare bill, little attention has been focused on the far larger sums received by President Barack Obama while he was a candidate in 2008.

A new figure, based on an exclusive analysis created for Raw Story by the Center for Responsive Politics, shows that President Obama received a staggering $20,175,303 from the healthcare industry during the 2008 election cycle, nearly three times the amount of his presidential rival John McCain. McCain took in $7,758,289, the Center found.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/12/exclusive-obama-received-20-million-of-healthcare-industry-money-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>135,000 uninsured Americans will die before health reform takes effect, analysis finds</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/12/15/135000-uninsured-americans-will-die-before-health-reform-takes-effect-analysis-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/12/15/135000-uninsured-americans-will-die-before-health-reform-takes-effect-analysis-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholars & Rogues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Medical School study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=13645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Raw Story analysis, based on a recent Harvard Medical School study, estimates that 135,000 American citizens and over 6,600 US veterans will die due to a lack of health insurance before current proposed healthcare reform measures would take effect.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/12/15/135000-uninsured-americans-will-die-before-health-reform-takes-effect-analysis-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Pentagon pursuing new investigation into Bush propaganda program</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/11/05/exclusive-pentagon-pursuing-new-investigation-into-bush-propaganda-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/11/05/exclusive-pentagon-pursuing-new-investigation-into-bush-propaganda-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressman John Tierney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Heddell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military analyst program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon Inspector General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roxie Merritt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=12800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon’s Office of Inspector General is conducting a new investigation into a covert Bush administration Defense Department program that used retired military analysts to produce positive wartime news coverage.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/11/05/exclusive-pentagon-pursuing-new-investigation-into-bush-propaganda-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Pentagon&#8217;s domestic propaganda program may not have been terminated</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/10/29/exclusive-pentagons-domestic-propaganda-program-may-not-have-been-terminated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/10/29/exclusive-pentagons-domestic-propaganda-program-may-not-have-been-terminated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military analyst program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roxie Merritt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=12601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pentagon officials won't confirm Bush propaganda program ended

The covert Bush administration program that used retired military analysts to generate favorable wartime news coverage may not have been terminated, Raw Story has found.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/10/29/exclusive-pentagons-domestic-propaganda-program-may-not-have-been-terminated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon used psychological operation on US public, documents show</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/10/21/pentagon-used-psychological-operation-on-us-public-documents-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/10/21/pentagon-used-psychological-operation-on-us-public-documents-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embed program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military analyst program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychological operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=12238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A months-long review of documents and interviews with Pentagon
personnel has revealed that the Bush Administration's military analyst
program -- aimed at selling the Iraq war to the American people --
operated through a secretive collaboration between the Defense
Department's press and community relations offices.

Raw Story has also uncovered evidence that directly ties the
activities undertaken in the military analyst program to an official US
military document’s definition of psychological operations --
propaganda that is only supposed to be directed toward foreign
audiences.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/10/21/pentagon-used-psychological-operation-on-us-public-documents-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tributes censor Cronkite&#8217;s anti-Iraq War stance</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/23/tributes-censor-cronkites-anti-iraq-war-stance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/23/tributes-censor-cronkites-anti-iraq-war-stance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronkite Tributes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronkite's views on Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Usborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Nichols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter cronkite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=10411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cronkite Called War "Illegal from the Start," Slammed Network Silence and Would've Spoken Out Again from Anchor Desk]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/07/23/tributes-censor-cronkites-anti-iraq-war-stance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Iran timeline omits US-backed &#8216;53 coup</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/06/25/cnns-iran-timeline-omits-us-backed-53-coup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/06/25/cnns-iran-timeline-omits-us-backed-53-coup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1953 coup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agence France-Presse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN Iran timeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohammad Reza Pahlavi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shah of Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might be more difficult for Republicans to bash President Obama for being "timid" in his comments about the Iranian government's violence against protesters if the U.S. media didn't consistently censor US-Iranian history.

Take CNN's recent Iran timeline, titled "A brief look at Iran's history."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/06/25/cnns-iran-timeline-omits-us-backed-53-coup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gene Randall &#8216;Reporting,&#8217; Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/06/17/gene-randall-reporting-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/06/17/gene-randall-reporting-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 Minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Randall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Randall Enterprises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly McBride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Journal Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Solomon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poynter Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Pelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Rendall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My article published yesterday in Columbia Journalism Review:

Former CNN correspondent-turned-PR consultant Gene Randall’s video “report” for oil giant Chevron might be unprecedented for how it blurred the line between public relations and journalism. But the Randall-Chevron production raises not only ethical questions, but also the question of whether a surge of newly pink-slipped reporters might go, as one media critic put it, “over to the dark side” and how that might further muddy the line between news and corporate advocacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/06/17/gene-randall-reporting-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry King writing sequel to &#8216;My Remarkable Journey&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/23/larry-king-writing-sequel-to-my-remarkable-journey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/23/larry-king-writing-sequel-to-my-remarkable-journey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush Paula Zahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calista Flockhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doris Kearns Goodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldo Rivera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry King autobiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Remarkable Journey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raiders of the Lost Ark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wounded-Courier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview with the Al Jazeera news network today, legendary talk show host Larry King revealed he's already working on a sequel to his new autobiography "My Remarkable Journey." King said the follow-up autobiography, with the working title "If You're Not Nauseous Yet, You Will Be," will disclose many juicy anecdotes and surprises he couldn't fit into his current book.

King, who's been making the rounds to promote "My Remarkable Journey," provided Al Jazeera with the following teasers that readers can expect to find in "If You're Not Nauseous Yet, You Will Be":]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/23/larry-king-writing-sequel-to-my-remarkable-journey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Greg Mitchell, Editor of &#8216;Editor &amp; Publisher&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/06/interview-with-greg-mitchell-editor-of-editor-publisher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/06/interview-with-greg-mitchell-editor-of-editor-publisher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholars & Rogues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor and Publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why Obama Won]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=9041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Mitchell, Editor of 'Editor and Publisher' magazine, recently spoke with MediaBloodhound from his Lower East Side Manhattan office at E&#38;P. In addition to the 2008 campaign, topics ranged from the dire state of the newspaper industry and its “dirty secret” to the impact of the U.S. media's censorship of graphic war images to whether Twitter and Sarah Palin will go the way of the pet rock.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/05/06/interview-with-greg-mitchell-editor-of-editor-publisher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT Public Editor dances around &#8216;Brutal Truth&#8217; of torture</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/30/nyt-public-editor-dances-around-brutal-truth-of-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/30/nyt-public-editor-dances-around-brutal-truth-of-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[totalitarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Telling the Brutal Truth"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark Hoyt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Tannen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Jehl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interrogation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Abramson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times public editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Shane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=8908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clark Hoyt's New York Times public editor column on Monday, "Telling the Brutal Truth," brings the ongoing "debate" over whether waterboarding is torture to brave new heights of absurdity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/30/nyt-public-editor-dances-around-brutal-truth-of-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Danner schools David Gergen on CIA torture</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/22/mark-danner-schools-david-gergen-on-cia-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/22/mark-danner-schools-david-gergen-on-cia-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AC360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA torture memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confinement box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Danner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleep deprivations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=8726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During a recent segment on CNN's AC 360, journalist and professor Mark Danner torpedoed CNN senior political analyst David Gergen's attempt to minimize new revelations of Bush administration CIA torture tactics released by the Obama administration.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/04/22/mark-danner-schools-david-gergen-on-cia-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Kurtz&#8217;s Octomom hypocrisy: He was against exploiting it for ratings before he was for it</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/31/howard-kurtzs-octomom-hypocrisy-he-was-against-exploiting-it-for-ratings-before-he-was-for-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/31/howard-kurtzs-octomom-hypocrisy-he-was-against-exploiting-it-for-ratings-before-he-was-for-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Allred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nadya Suleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Octomom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[octuplets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Richmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliable Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=8351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington Post and CNN media critic Howard Kurtz dedicated an entire segment of this past Sunday's Reliable Sources cable program to a gratuitous pie fight between two players involved in Nadya "Octomom" Suleman's never-ending nationally televised freak show. But a little over a month ago, Kurtz decried the media for exploiting the octuplet mother for ratings and for doing so under the false pretense that concern for her babies' well being drove their round-the-clock coverage.

What a difference a few weeks make. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/31/howard-kurtzs-octomom-hypocrisy-he-was-against-exploiting-it-for-ratings-before-he-was-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Officials say feds involved in Nevada ACORN raid</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/18/officials-say-feds-involved-in-nevada-acorn-raid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/18/officials-say-feds-involved-in-nevada-acorn-raid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholars & Rogues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jacobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada ACORN raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Attorneys scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=8147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of the reason I've been off the radar here for so long -- my latest investigative report for Raw Story:

Federal agencies were involved in the decision to raid the office of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in Nevada last October, just weeks before Election Day, the offices of Nevada’s Secretary of State and Attorney General say.

The allegations raise questions of whether politics played a part in the raid and calls into question assertions by the US Attorney’s office that they were uninvolved. Federal guidelines instruct agencies investigating election fraud to avoid action that might impact the elective process.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/18/officials-say-feds-involved-in-nevada-acorn-raid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woodruff parrots GOP talking points to WH budget dir</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/01/woodruff-parrots-gop-talking-points-to-wh-budget-dir/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/01/woodruff-parrots-gop-talking-points-to-wh-budget-dir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Holtz-Eakin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Woodruff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama budget plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Orszag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=7853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a primer on how to conduct an interview relying almost solely on Republican talking points, PBS NewsHour anchor Judy Woodruff discussed the new budget plan with White House Budget Director Peter Orszag on Wednesday night.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/03/01/woodruff-parrots-gop-talking-points-to-wh-budget-dir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2009/02/26/20090226_budget.mp3" length="4080512" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthews repairing &#8216;balanced&#8217; cred with&#8230;imbalance</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/30/matthews-repairing-balanced-cred-withimbalance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/30/matthews-repairing-balanced-cred-withimbalance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scholars & Rogues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=7296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re Chris Matthews and you&#8217;re attempting to regain a reputation for being &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; after famously exhibiting excitement about Barack Obama and his presidential campaign, what do you do? How about facilitating a discussion about Obama&#8217;s proposed stimulus plan with two lawmakers from the same party, the Republican Party?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s precisely what Matthews did during a segment on his January 27 edition of <em>Hardball</em>, inviting only Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada) and Representative Mike Pence, the House Republican Conference Chair, to discuss the plan.</p>
<div><iframe frameborder="0" height="339" scrolling="no" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/28880184#28880184" width="425"></iframe>
<p class="msnbcLinks">
<!--more--><br />
Not enough? How about a segment exploring whether Rush Limbaugh is the &#8220;new voice of the GOP&#8221; but once again facilitating the &#8220;balanced&#8221; discussion with two people on the right and no one on the left or even center? (Never mind that Limbaugh has been the voice of the Republican Party for two decades and counting.) In the very same broadcast, Matthews did this as well, bringing on MSNBC analyst Pat Buchanan and right-wing radio talk show host Heidi Harris (you might remember that Harris, appearing on <em>Hardball</em> during the election season, had told Matthews that women vote for Democrats because they <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160010">&#8220;tend to think with their hearts and not with their minds&#8221;</a>).</p>
<div><iframe frameborder="0" height="339" scrolling="no" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/28880701#28880701" width="425"></iframe>
<p class="msnbcLinks"></p>
<p>Want more? How about, in the process, framing a question based on Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s assertions and posing it to these two other right-wingers while prefacing the question with the words &#8220;let&#8217;s get back to the facts here&#8221;?</p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;">MATTHEWS: Look, let&#8217;s get back to the facts here. Does he [Limbaugh] have something here by saying that Barack Obama is trying to get the Republicans to join him, or at least a handful of them, so that he can share the blame if it [stimulus plan] doesn&#8217;t work? Is that a reasonable claim?</p>
<p>This kind of fairness and balance not only rivals Fox News but threatens to out-Fox it.</p>
<p>Does anyone doubt that Matthews once again <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m9Gbb6NSwM&amp;feature=related">feels a thrill running up his leg</a>? It&#8217;s official: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Matthews is back!</p>
<p><em>Cross-posted from <a href="http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/weblog/2009/01/story-of-the-day-chris-matthews-repairs-balanced-cred-with-imbalance.html">MediaBloodhound</a>.</em></div>
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/30/matthews-repairing-balanced-cred-withimbalance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXCLUSIVE: Leaked menu of George Will&#8217;s catered dinner party for Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/23/exclusive-leaked-menu-of-george-wills-catered-dinner-party-for-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/23/exclusive-leaked-menu-of-george-wills-catered-dinner-party-for-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholars & Rogues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Will dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's meeting with conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wounded-Courier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conversation at the recent dinner party thrown by conservative pundit George Will for Barack Obama may remain shrouded in secrecy. But one thing will not: the menu. And there was no shortage of food. An anonymous source leaked the detailed catered menu to The Wounded-Courier today. (Other conservative pundits in attendance included William Kristol, David Brooks, Charles Krauthammer, Larry Kudlow, Paul Gigot, Peggy Noonan, Michael Barone and Rich Lowry.) Here is what was served:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/23/exclusive-leaked-menu-of-george-wills-catered-dinner-party-for-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MediaBloodhound&#8217;s 2008 Fact or Fiction Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/13/mediabloodhounds-2008-fact-or-fiction-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/13/mediabloodhounds-2008-fact-or-fiction-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jacobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neocons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fact or Fiction Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaBloodhound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/?p=6778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following are quotes and headlines culled from this past year at MediaBloodhound (keep in mind some were said or written prior to '08 but noted here during the year). Some are real (fact) and others are from satirical articles (fiction) posted under "The Wounded-Courier." See if you can distinguish between the two. Once you've answered all the entries -- but not before because multiple entries may come from the same post and checking one might give away another -- you'll find the answer key at the very bottom.

All right, news junkies and media mavens, the 2008 Fact or Fiction Challenge is on:
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/01/13/mediabloodhounds-2008-fact-or-fiction-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
